Literature DB >> 16030333

Legislating "sound science": the role of the tobacco industry.

Annamaria Baba1, Daniel M Cook, Thomas O McGarity, Lisa A Bero.   

Abstract

In the late 1990s, in an effort to dispute the link between secondhand smoke and lung cancer, Philip Morris initiated a campaign to legislate "sound science." The campaign involved enacting data access and data quality laws to obtain previously confidential research data in order to re-analyze it based on industry-generated data quality standards. Philip Morris worked with other corporate interests to form coalitions and work-groups, develop a "data integrity" outreach program, sponsor symposia on "research integrity," and draft language for the new acts. The tobacco industry played a role in establishing laws that increase corporate influence on public health and regulatory policy decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16030333     DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.050963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  15 in total

Review 1.  The ethics of industry experimentation using employees: the case of taste-testing pesticide-treated tobacco.

Authors:  Patricia A McDaniel; Gina Solomon; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-11-29       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The creation of industry front groups: the tobacco industry and "get government off our back".

Authors:  Dorie E Apollonio; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The politics of smoking in federal buildings: an executive order case study.

Authors:  Daniel M Cook; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Scientific integrity issues in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: Improving research reproducibility, credibility, and transparency.

Authors:  Christopher A Mebane; John P Sumpter; Anne Fairbrother; Thomas P Augspurger; Timothy J Canfield; William L Goodfellow; Patrick D Guiney; Anne LeHuray; Lorraine Maltby; David B Mayfield; Michael J McLaughlin; Lisa S Ortego; Tamar Schlekat; Richard P Scroggins; Tim A Verslycke
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.992

5.  Uneven Access to Smoke-Free Laws and Policies and Its Effect on Health Equity in the United States: 2000-2019.

Authors:  Amy Y Hafez; Mariaelena Gonzalez; Margarete C Kulik; Maya Vijayaraghavan; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Manufacturing credibility: the National Energy Management Institute and the Tobacco Institute's strategy for indoor air quality.

Authors:  Richard B Campbell; Edith D Balbach
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  Challenging the epidemiologic evidence on passive smoking: tactics of tobacco industry expert witnesses.

Authors:  John A Francis; Amy K Shea; Jonathan M Samet
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  "A delicate diplomatic situation": tobacco industry efforts to gain control of the Framingham Study.

Authors:  Janine K Cataldo; Lisa A Bero; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Tobacco Industry Influence on the American Law Institute's Restatements of Torts and Implications for Its Conflict of Interest Policies.

Authors:  Elizabeth Laposata; Richard Barnes; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Iowa Law Rev       Date:  2012-11

10.  "Working the system"--British American tobacco's influence on the European union treaty and its implications for policy: an analysis of internal tobacco industry documents.

Authors:  Katherine E Smith; Gary Fooks; Jeff Collin; Heide Weishaar; Sema Mandal; Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.