Literature DB >> 15914820

Political coalitions for mutual advantage: the case of the Tobacco Institute's Labor Management Committee.

Edith D Balbach1, Elizabeth M Barbeau, Viola Manteufel, Jocelyn Pan.   

Abstract

In 1984, the tobacco workers' union and the Tobacco Institute, which represents US tobacco companies, formed a labor management committee (LMC). The institute relied on LMC unions to resist smoke-free worksite rules. In a review of the internal tobacco industry documents now publicly available, we found that the LMC succeeded for 2 primary reasons. First, the LMC furthered members' interests, allowing them to overcome institutional barriers to policy success. Second, the LMC used an "institutions, ideas, and interests" strategy to encourage non-LMC unions to oppose smoke-free worksite rules. While public health advocates missed an opportunity to partner with unions on the issue of smoke-free worksites during the era studied, they can use a similar strategy to form coalitions with unions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15914820      PMCID: PMC1449295          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.052126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  14 in total

1.  Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire?

Authors:  R E Malone; E D Balbach
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Feeling the heat: displaced tobacco workers in North Carolina.

Authors:  E M Barbeau; C Levenstein
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  1999

Review 3.  Labor positions on worksite tobacco control policies: a review of arbitration cases.

Authors:  G Sorensen; R Youngstrom; C Maclachlan; S J Gibson; K Emmons; D Johnston; C Levenstein
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.222

4.  Black lung: the social production of disease.

Authors:  B E Smith
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.663

5.  Finding common ground: how public health can work with organized labor to protect workers from environmental tobacco smoke. National Association for Public Health Policy.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.222

6.  Tobacco industry documents: comparing the Minnesota Depository and internet access.

Authors:  E D Balbach; R J Gasior; E M Barbeau
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 7.  Public health under attack: the American Stop Smoking Intervention Study (ASSIST) and the tobacco industry.

Authors:  Jenny White; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Employment implications of declining tobacco product sales for the regional economies of the United States.

Authors:  K E Warner; G A Fulton; P Nicolas; D R Grimes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-04-24       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Evaluation of the American Stop Smoking Intervention Study (ASSIST): a report of outcomes.

Authors:  Frances A Stillman; Anne M Hartman; Barry I Graubard; Elizabeth A Gilpin; David M Murray; James T Gibson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 10.  Tobacco industry efforts to present ventilation as an alternative to smoke-free environments in North America.

Authors:  J Drope; S A Bialous; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  13 in total

1.  Hospitality workers' attitudes and exposure to secondhand smoke, hazardous chemicals, and working conditions.

Authors:  Dave Pearson; Antoinette Angulo; Emily Bourcier; Elizabeth Freeman; Roger Valdez
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  The politics of smoking in federal buildings: an executive order case study.

Authors:  Daniel M Cook; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Labor unions: a public health institution.

Authors:  Beth Malinowski; Meredith Minkler; Laura Stock
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  From strange bedfellows to natural allies: the shifting allegiance of fire service organisations in the push for federal fire-safe cigarette legislation.

Authors:  E M Barbeau; G Kelder; S Ahmed; V Mantuefel; E D Balbach
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Manufacturing credibility: the National Energy Management Institute and the Tobacco Institute's strategy for indoor air quality.

Authors:  Richard B Campbell; Edith D Balbach
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Vested Interests in addiction research and policy. Alliance between tobacco and alcohol industries to shape public policy.

Authors:  Nan Jiang; Pamela Ling
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  Building alliances in unlikely places: progressive allies and the Tobacco Institute's coalition strategy on cigarette excise taxes.

Authors:  Richard B Campbell; Edith D Balbach
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Unhealthy partnerships: the tobacco industry and African American and Latino labor organizations.

Authors:  Annaebel Raebeck; Richard Campbell; Edith Balbach
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2010-04

Review 9.  Mobilising public opinion for the tobacco industry: the Consumer Tax Alliance and excise taxes.

Authors:  R Campbell; E D Balbach
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Political coalitions and working women: how the tobacco industry built a relationship with the Coalition of Labor Union Women.

Authors:  Edith D Balbach; Abby Herzberg; Elizabeth M Barbeau
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.