Literature DB >> 19528643

Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin?

Adam G Jones1, Nicholas L Ratterman.   

Abstract

Charles Darwin laid the foundation for all modern work on sexual selection in his seminal book The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. In this work, Darwin fleshed out the mechanism of sexual selection, a hypothesis that he had proposed in The Origin of Species. He went well beyond a simple description of the phenomenon by providing extensive evidence and considering the far-reaching implications of the idea. Here we consider the contributions of Darwin to sexual selection with a particular eye on how far we have progressed in the last 150 years. We focus on 2 key questions in sexual selection. First, why does mate choice evolve at all? And second, what factors determine the strength of mate choice (or intensity of sexual selection) in each sex? Darwin provided partial answers to these questions, and the progress that has been made on both of these topics since his time should be seen as one of the great triumphs of modern evolutionary biology. However, a review of the literature shows that key aspects of sexual selection are still plagued by confusion and disagreement. Many of these areas are complex and will require new theory and empirical data for complete resolution. Overall, Darwin's contributions are still surprisingly relevant to the modern study of sexual selection, so students of evolutionary biology would be well advised to revisit his works. Although we have made significant progress in some areas of sexual selection research, we still have much to accomplish.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19528643      PMCID: PMC2702796          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0901129106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  45 in total

1.  Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding.

Authors:  Tom Tregenza; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations.

Authors:  Adam G Jones; William R Ardren
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Stability of the G-matrix in a population experiencing pleiotropic mutation, stabilizing selection, and genetic drift.

Authors:  Adam G Jones; Stevan J Arnold; Reinhard Bürger
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences.

Authors:  Rebecca C Fuller; David Houle; Joseph Travis
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Understanding reversals in the relative strength of sexual selection on males and females: a role for sperm competition?

Authors:  Patrick D Lorch
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Selection and covariance.

Authors:  G R Price
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-01       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Microsatellite analysis of maternity and the mating system in the Gulf pipefish Syngnathus scovelli, a species with male pregnancy and sex-role reversal.

Authors:  A G Jones; J C Avise
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Environmental, demographic, and genetic mating system variation among five geographically distinct dusky pipefish (Syngnathus floridae) populations.

Authors:  Kenyon B Mobley; Adam G Jones
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Female fifteen-spined sticklebacks prefer better fathers.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 10.  Postcopulatory sexual selection: Darwin's omission and its consequences.

Authors:  William G Eberhard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  73 in total

1.  A sex-specific trade-off between mating preferences for genetic compatibility and body size in a cichlid fish with mutual mate choice.

Authors:  Timo Thünken; Denis Meuthen; Theo C M Bakker; Sebastian A Baldauf
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Female Lincoln's sparrows modulate their behavior in response to variation in male song quality.

Authors:  Samuel P Caro; Kendra B Sewall; Katrina G Salvante; Keith W Sockman
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 2.671

3.  Intrasexual competition in females: evidence for sexual selection?

Authors:  Kimberly A Rosvall
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 2.671

Review 4.  Looking for sexual selection in the female brain.

Authors:  Molly E Cummings
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Direct benefits of mate choice: a meta-analysis of plumage colour and offspring feeding rates in birds.

Authors:  Gergely Hegyi; Dóra Kötél; Miklós Laczi
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2015-09-18

Review 6.  Monogamy without parental care? Social and genetic mating systems of avian brood parasites.

Authors:  William E Feeney; Christina Riehl
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Through their eyes: selective attention in peahens during courtship.

Authors:  Jessica L Yorzinski; Gail L Patricelli; Jason S Babcock; John M Pearson; Michael L Platt
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 8.  In the light of evolution III: two centuries of Darwin.

Authors:  John C Avise; Francisco J Ayala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Reproductive decisions under ecological constraints: it's about time.

Authors:  Patricia Adair Gowaty; Stephen P Hubbell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Site fidelity facilitates pair formation in aggregations of coral reef cardinalfish.

Authors:  Theresa Rueger; Naomi M Gardiner; Geoffrey P Jones
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.