Literature DB >> 21228889

Quantitative proteomic analyses of the response of acidophilic microbial communities to different pH conditions.

Christopher P Belnap1, Chongle Pan, Vincent J Denef, Nagiza F Samatova, Robert L Hettich, Jillian F Banfield.   

Abstract

Extensive genomic characterization of multi-species acid mine drainage microbial consortia combined with laboratory cultivation has enabled the application of quantitative proteomic analyses at the community level. In this study, quantitative proteomic comparisons were used to functionally characterize laboratory-cultivated acidophilic communities sustained in pH 1.45 or 0.85 conditions. The distributions of all proteins identified for individual organisms indicated biases for either high or low pH, and suggests pH-specific niche partitioning for low abundance bacteria and archaea. Although the proteome of the dominant bacterium, Leptospirillum group II, was largely unaffected by pH treatments, analysis of functional categories indicated proteins involved in amino acid and nucleotide metabolism, as well as cell membrane/envelope biogenesis were overrepresented at high pH. Comparison of specific protein abundances indicates higher pH conditions favor Leptospirillum group III, whereas low pH conditions promote the growth of certain archaea. Thus, quantitative proteomic comparisons revealed distinct differences in community composition and metabolic function of individual organisms during different pH treatments. Proteomic analysis revealed other aspects of community function. Different numbers of phage proteins were identified across biological replicates, indicating stochastic spatial heterogeneity of phage outbreaks. Additionally, proteomic data were used to identify a previously unknown genotypic variant of Leptospirillum group II, an indication of selection for a specific Leptospirillum group II population in laboratory communities. Our results confirm the importance of pH and related geochemical factors in fine-tuning acidophilic microbial community structure and function at the species and strain level, and demonstrate the broad utility of proteomics in laboratory community studies.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21228889      PMCID: PMC3146278          DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2010.200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ISME J        ISSN: 1751-7362            Impact factor:   10.302


  37 in total

1.  Phage community dynamics in hot springs.

Authors:  Mya Breitbart; Linda Wegley; Steven Leeds; Tom Schoenfeld; Forest Rohwer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Robust estimation of peptide abundance ratios and rigorous scoring of their variability and bias in quantitative shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Chongle Pan; Guruprasad Kora; David L Tabb; Dale A Pelletier; W Hayes McDonald; Gregory B Hurst; Robert L Hettich; Nagiza F Samatova
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Genetic exchange across a species boundary in the archaeal genus ferroplasma.

Authors:  John M Eppley; Gene W Tyson; Wayne M Getz; Jillian F Banfield
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Cultivation and quantitative proteomic analyses of acidophilic microbial communities.

Authors:  Christopher P Belnap; Chongle Pan; Nathan C VerBerkmoes; Mary E Power; Nagiza F Samatova; Rudolf L Carver; Robert L Hettich; Jillian F Banfield
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Resource partitioning and sympatric differentiation among closely related bacterioplankton.

Authors:  Dana E Hunt; Lawrence A David; Dirk Gevers; Sarah P Preheim; Eric J Alm; Martin F Polz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Design and Performance of rRNA Targeted Oligonucleotide Probes for in Situ Detection and Phylogenetic Identification of Microorganisms Inhabiting Acid Mine Drainage Environments.

Authors:  P.L. Bond; J.F. Banfield
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  Comparison of acid mine drainage microbial communities in physically and geochemically distinct ecosystems.

Authors:  P L Bond; G K Druschel; J F Banfield
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Seasonal variations in microbial populations and environmental conditions in an extreme acid mine drainage environment.

Authors:  K J Edwards; T M Gihring; J F Banfield
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Community proteogenomics highlights microbial strain-variant protein expression within activated sludge performing enhanced biological phosphorus removal.

Authors:  Paul Wilmes; Anders F Andersson; Mark G Lefsrud; Margaret Wexler; Manesh Shah; Bing Zhang; Robert L Hettich; Philip L Bond; Nathan C VerBerkmoes; Jillian F Banfield
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 10.302

10.  Community proteomics of a natural microbial biofilm.

Authors:  Rachna J Ram; Nathan C Verberkmoes; Michael P Thelen; Gene W Tyson; Brett J Baker; Robert C Blake; Manesh Shah; Robert L Hettich; Jillian F Banfield
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  A road map for the development of community systems (CoSy) biology.

Authors:  Karsten Zengler; Bernhard O Palsson
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Heterotrophic archaea contribute to carbon cycling in low-pH, suboxic biofilm communities.

Authors:  Nicholas B Justice; Chongle Pan; Ryan Mueller; Susan E Spaulding; Vega Shah; Christine L Sun; Alexis P Yelton; Christopher S Miller; Brian C Thomas; Manesh Shah; Nathan VerBerkmoes; Robert Hettich; Jillian F Banfield
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Insights from quantitative metaproteomics and protein-stable isotope probing into microbial ecology.

Authors:  Martin von Bergen; Nico Jehmlich; Martin Taubert; Carsten Vogt; Felipe Bastida; Florian-Alexander Herbst; Frank Schmidt; Hans-Hermann Richnow; Jana Seifert
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 4.  Extreme challenges and advances in archaeal proteomics.

Authors:  Julie A Maupin-Furlow; Matthew A Humbard; Phillip Aaron Kirkland
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 7.934

Review 5.  Microbial diversity in extreme environments.

Authors:  Wen-Sheng Shu; Li-Nan Huang
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 60.633

6.  Pinewood Nematode Alters the Endophytic and Rhizospheric Microbial Communities of Pinus massoniana.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Xuan Wang; Yongxia Li; Zhenkai Liu; Dongzhen Li; Xiaojian Wen; Yuqian Feng; Xingyao Zhang
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 7.  Metaproteomics: harnessing the power of high performance mass spectrometry to identify the suite of proteins that control metabolic activities in microbial communities.

Authors:  Robert L Hettich; Chongle Pan; Karuna Chourey; Richard J Giannone
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Metabolites associated with adaptation of microorganisms to an acidophilic, metal-rich environment identified by stable-isotope-enabled metabolomics.

Authors:  Annika C Mosier; Nicholas B Justice; Benjamin P Bowen; Richard Baran; Brian C Thomas; Trent R Northen; Jillian F Banfield
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 7.867

9.  Structural and functional insights from the metagenome of an acidic hot spring microbial planktonic community in the Colombian Andes.

Authors:  Diego Javier Jiménez; Fernando Dini Andreote; Diego Chaves; José Salvador Montaña; Cesar Osorio-Forero; Howard Junca; María Mercedes Zambrano; Sandra Baena
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Contemporary environmental variation determines microbial diversity patterns in acid mine drainage.

Authors:  Jia-Liang Kuang; Li-Nan Huang; Lin-Xing Chen; Zheng-Shuang Hua; Sheng-Jin Li; Min Hu; Jin-Tian Li; Wen-Sheng Shu
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 10.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.