Literature DB >> 17037910

Robust estimation of peptide abundance ratios and rigorous scoring of their variability and bias in quantitative shotgun proteomics.

Chongle Pan1, Guruprasad Kora, David L Tabb, Dale A Pelletier, W Hayes McDonald, Gregory B Hurst, Robert L Hettich, Nagiza F Samatova.   

Abstract

The abundance ratio between the light and heavy isotopologues of an isotopically labeled peptide can be estimated from their selected ion chromatograms. However, quantitative shotgun proteomics measurements yield selected ion chromatograms at highly variable signal-to-noise ratios for tens of thousands of peptides. This challenge calls for algorithms that not only robustly estimate the abundance ratios of different peptides but also rigorously score each abundance ratio for the expected estimation bias and variability. Scoring of the abundance ratios, much like scoring of sequence assignment for tandem mass spectra by peptide identification algorithms, enables filtering of unreliable peptide quantification and use of formal statistical inference in the subsequent protein abundance ratio estimation. In this study, a parallel paired covariance algorithm is used for robust peak detection in selected ion chromatograms. A peak profile is generated for each peptide, which is a scatterplot of ion intensities measured for the two isotopologues within their chromatographic peaks. Principal component analysis of the peak profile is proposed to estimate the peptide abundance ratio and to score the estimation with the signal-to-noise ratio of the peak profile (profile signal-to-noise ratio). We demonstrate that the profile signal-to-noise ratio is inversely correlated with the variability and bias of peptide abundance ratio estimation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17037910     DOI: 10.1021/ac0606554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  17 in total

1.  Protein turnover quantification in a multilabeling approach: from data calculation to evaluation.

Authors:  Christian Trötschel; Stefan P Albaum; Daniel Wolff; Simon Schröder; Alexander Goesmann; Tim W Nattkemper; Ansgar Poetsch
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Relative, label-free protein quantitation: spectral counting error statistics from nine replicate MudPIT samples.

Authors:  Bret Cooper; Jian Feng; Wesley M Garrett
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 3.  Protein abundance ratios for global studies of prokaryotes.

Authors:  Qiangwei Xia; Erik L Hendrickson; Tiansong Wang; Richard J Lamont; John A Leigh; Murray Hackett
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Quantitative proteomic analyses of the response of acidophilic microbial communities to different pH conditions.

Authors:  Christopher P Belnap; Chongle Pan; Vincent J Denef; Nagiza F Samatova; Robert L Hettich; Jillian F Banfield
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Revealing the role of phosphatidylserine in shear stress-mediated protection in endothelial cells.

Authors:  Julie K Freed; Michael R Shortreed; Christopher J Kleefisch; Lloyd M Smith; Andrew S Greene
Journal:  Endothelium       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug

Review 6.  Quality assessment for clinical proteomics.

Authors:  David L Tabb
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.281

7.  Statistical model to analyze quantitative proteomics data obtained by 18O/16O labeling and linear ion trap mass spectrometry: application to the study of vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis in endothelial cells.

Authors:  Inmaculada Jorge; Pedro Navarro; Pablo Martínez-Acedo; Estefanía Núñez; Horacio Serrano; Arántzazu Alfranca; Juan Miguel Redondo; Jesús Vázquez
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 5.911

8.  A comparison of the accuracy of iTRAQ quantification by nLC-ESI MSMS and nLC-MALDI MSMS methods.

Authors:  Sally L Shirran; Catherine H Botting
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Bioinformatics Tools for Mass Spectrometry-Based High-Throughput Quantitative Proteomics Platforms.

Authors:  Alexey V Nefedov; Miroslaw J Gilski; Rovshan G Sadygov
Journal:  Curr Proteomics       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 0.837

10.  IDPQuantify: combining precursor intensity with spectral counts for protein and peptide quantification.

Authors:  Yao-Yi Chen; Matthew C Chambers; Ming Li; Amy-Joan L Ham; Jeffrey L Turner; Bing Zhang; David L Tabb
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 4.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.