Literature DB >> 21227955

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T in patients with cardiac rhythm devices.

Francisco Buendía1, Óscar Cano, Juan Miguel Sánchez-Gómez, Begoña Igual, Joaquín Osca, María José Sancho-Tello, José Olagüe, Antonio Salvador.   

Abstract

AIMS: Recent studies suggest that non-cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning can be performed safely in selected cardiac rhythm device patients. However, little is known about the safety of performing specific cardiac MRI in this setting. We sought to determine the feasibility of cardiac MRI in patients with pacemakers (PMs) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients underwent a total of 39 (8 ICDs and 31 PM) cardiac MRI examinations at 1.5 T using usual protocols without specific absorption rate (SAR) restrictions. Nine PM-dependent patients were included. All devices were interrogated before and immediately after MRI. During the scan, pacing mode was programmed to asynchronous for PM-dependent patients whereas ICDs were programmed to a monitor-only mode. All devices were functioning appropriately after cardiac MRI. Comparison of device parameters obtained before and immediately after MRI revealed no significant changes in pacing threshold, lead impedance, battery status, or sensing signal amplitude. Neither clinical events nor patient complaints were reported. Significant imaging artefacts were present on 11 of 39 scans (28.2%). These artefacts were significantly more frequent in ICDs (8 of 8, 100%) vs. PMs (3 of 31, 9.7%) (P < 0.001). Diagnostic questions were answered in 92.3% of the cases, with just three pronounced artefacts preventing an adequate diagnosis in three ICD patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that cardiac MRI may be performed safely in appropriately selected patients with close monitoring during the scan without limitation of peak SAR level using several precautionary measures. Image artefacts were more frequent in ICD patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21227955     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euq501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  9 in total

1.  [Magnetic resonance imaging and implantable cardiac devices. Current status and future perspectives of MR-compatible systems].

Authors:  M Dorenkamp; M Roser; B Hamm; W Haverkamp
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  An eight-year prospective controlled study about the safety and diagnostic value of cardiac and non-cardiac 1.5-T MRI in patients with a conventional pacemaker or a conventional implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Lupo; Riccardo Cappato; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Secchi; Giacomo D E Papini; Sara Foresti; Hussam Ali; Guido M G De Ambroggi; Antonio Sorgente; Gianluca Epicoco; Paola M Cannaò; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with magnetic resonance conditional pacemaker systems at 1.5 T: influence of pacemaker related artifacts on image quality including first pass perfusion, aortic and mitral valve assessment, flow measurement, short tau inversion recovery and T1-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Oliver Klein-Wiele; Marietta Garmer; Martin Busch; Serban Mateiescu; Rhyan Urbien; Gianluca Barbone; Kaffer Kara; Michael Schulte-Hermes; Frauke Metz; Birgit Hailer; Dietrich Grönemeyer
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using wideband sequences in patients with nonconditional cardiac implanted electronic devices.

Authors:  Duc H Do; Vaughn Eyvazian; Aileen J Bayoneta; Peng Hu; J Paul Finn; Jason S Bradfield; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Noel G Boyle
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  Feasibility and safety of adenosine cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with MR conditional pacemaker systems at 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  Oliver Klein-Wiele; Marietta Garmer; Rhyan Urbien; Martin Busch; Kaffer Kara; Serban Mateiescu; Dietrich Grönemeyer; Michael Schulte-Hermes; Marc Garbrecht; Birgit Hailer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 6.  MRI-conditional pacemakers: current perspectives.

Authors:  António M Ferreira; Francisco Costa; António Tralhão; Hugo Marques; Nuno Cardim; Pedro Adragão
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-05-07

7.  Immediate and 12 months follow up of function and lead integrity after cranial MRI in 356 patients with conventional cardiac pacemakers.

Authors:  Olaf M Muehling; Reza Wakili; Martin Greif; Franz von Ziegler; Dominik Morhard; Hartmut Brueckmann; Alexander Becker
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  The Kora Pacemaker is Safe and Effective for Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Arnaud Savouré; Alexis Mechulan; Marc Burban; Audrey Olivier; Arnaud Lazarus
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-12

9.  Safe performance of magnetic resonance of the heart in patients with magnetic resonance conditional pacemaker systems: the safety issue of the ESTIMATE study.

Authors:  Christian G Wollmann; Karin Thudt; Bernd Kaiser; Erich Salomonowitz; Harald Mayr; Sebastian Globits
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 5.364

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.