Literature DB >> 29017930

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using wideband sequences in patients with nonconditional cardiac implanted electronic devices.

Duc H Do1, Vaughn Eyvazian1, Aileen J Bayoneta2, Peng Hu2, J Paul Finn2, Jason S Bradfield1, Kalyanam Shivkumar1, Noel G Boyle3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been performed safely in patients without MRI-conditional cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), but experience specifically with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is limited in this patient population.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the safety of CMR in non-MRI-conditional CIEDs and the interpretability of images using wideband sequences.
METHODS: We performed 114 consecutive CMR studies in 111 patients (mean age 59 ± 14 years, with 12 pacemakers, 73 implantable cardioverter defibrillators, 29 biventricular defibrillators) using a wideband pulse sequence for late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging. A standardized protocol for device management and patient monitoring was followed. Patients were evaluated for major clinical adverse events and device parameter changes immediately after CMR and at clinical follow-up.
RESULTS: In total, 111 CMR studies were completed successfully. There were no patient deaths, new arrhythmias, immediate generator or lead failures, electrical resets, or pacing capture failures in dependent patients. Right atrial, right ventricular, and left ventricular lead impedances were significantly lower post CMR, with median differences -7 Ω (interquartile range [IQR] -20 to 0 Ω; P < .0001), 0 Ω (IQR -19 to 0 Ω; P = .0001), and -10 Ω (IQR -30 to 0 Ω; P = .023), respectively. These changes persisted through the follow-up period, with median differences -18.5 Ω (IQR -41 to -66 Ω; P = .007), -19 Ω (IQR -44 to -7 Ω; P = .006), and -30 Ω (IQR -130 to 0 Ω; P = .003), respectively. Ninety-seven studies (87%) had no artifact limiting interpretation.
CONCLUSIONS: CMR can be performed safely in non-MRI-conditional CIEDs using a standardized protocol. Use of a wideband pulse sequence for LGE imaging yields a high rate of studies unaffected by artifact.
Copyright © 2017 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac implanted electronic device; Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; Imaging protocol; Ventricular tachycardia; Viability assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29017930      PMCID: PMC5823604          DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  25 in total

1.  Impact of ICD artifact burden on late gadolinium enhancement cardiac MR imaging in patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation.

Authors:  Olurotimi Mesubi; Ghada Ahmad; Jean Jeudy; Alejandro Jimenez; Richard Kuk; Anastasios Saliaris; Vincent See; Stephen Shorofsky; Timm Dickfeld
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Quantitative assessment of artifacts on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors:  Takeshi Sasaki; Rozann Hansford; Menekhem M Zviman; Aravindan Kolandaivelu; David A Bluemke; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Henry R Halperin; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 7.792

3.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T in patients with cardiac rhythm devices.

Authors:  Francisco Buendía; Óscar Cano; Juan Miguel Sánchez-Gómez; Begoña Igual; Joaquín Osca; María José Sancho-Tello; José Olagüe; Antonio Salvador
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 5.214

4.  Safety and utility of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Authors:  Jordan B Strom; Jill B Whelan; Changyu Shen; Shuang Qi Zheng; Koenraad J Mortele; Daniel B Kramer
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  Artefact-free late gadolinium enhancement imaging in patients with implanted cardiac devices using a modified broadband sequence: current strategies and results from a real-world patient cohort.

Authors:  Sebastian Hilbert; Alexander Weber; Kay Nehrke; Peter Börnert; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Sabrina Oebel; Ricardo Spampinato; Cathleen Rogge; Sergio Richter; Gerhard Hindricks; Ingo Paetsch; Cosima Jahnke
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 5.214

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-Tesla.

Authors:  Edward T Martin; James A Coman; Frank G Shellock; Christopher C Pulling; Robert Fair; Kim Jenkins
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5-T in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors:  Claas P Naehle; Katharina Strach; Daniel Thomas; Carsten Meyer; Markus Linhart; Sascha Bitaraf; Harold Litt; Jörg Otto Schwab; Hans Schild; Torsten Sommer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Failed Ablation Procedures for Ventricular Tachycardia.

Authors:  Mario Njeim; Miki Yokokawa; Luba Frank; Thomas Crawford; Eric Good; Fred Morady; Frank Bogun
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-11-06

9.  Improved late gadolinium enhancement MR imaging for patients with implanted cardiac devices.

Authors:  Shams Rashid; Stanislas Rapacchi; Marmar Vaseghi; Roderick Tung; Kalyanam Shivkumar; J Paul Finn; Peng Hu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  The Safety of Cardiac and Thoracic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.

Authors:  Sanjay Dandamudi; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; Pat Mongkolwat; Amir A Rahsepar; Todd T Tomson; Nishant Verma; Rishi Arora; Alex B Chicos; Susan S Kim; Albert C Lin; Rod S Passman; Bradley P Knight
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.173

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Viewpoint: Cardiac implantable electronic devices and magnetic resonance compatibility: was it really necessary?

Authors:  Richard Sutton; David G Benditt
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Feasibility of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Wideband Protocol in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and Its Utility for Defining Scar.

Authors:  Amita Singh; Keigo Kawaji; Neha Goyal; Noreen T Nazir; Andrew Beaser; Virginia O'Keefe-Baker; Karima Addetia; Roderick Tung; Peng Hu; Victor Mor-Avi; Amit R Patel
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Cardiac implanted electronic devices and MRI safety in 2018-the state of play.

Authors:  Ryan Mark Shulman; Ben Hunt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Safety and Clinical Impact of MRI in Patients with Non-MRI-conditional Cardiac Devices.

Authors:  Sanjaya K Gupta; Lina Ya'qoub; Alan P Wimmer; Stanley Fisher; Ibrahim M Saeed
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2020-10-22

Review 5.  Role of Cardiac MRI Imaging of Focal and Diffuse Inflammation and Fibrosis in Cardiomyopathy Patients Who Have Pacemakers/ICD Devices.

Authors:  Ananna Zaman; Samantha Zhao; Jordana Kron; Antonio Abbate; Anna Tomdio; W Gregory Hundley; Jennifer H Jordan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.955

6.  Reducing cardiac implantable electronic device-induced artefacts in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Aino-Maija Vuorinen; Lauri Lehmonen; Jarkko Karvonen; Miia Holmström; Sari Kivistö; Touko Kaasalainen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 7.034

Review 7.  Contemporary Tools and Techniques for Substrate Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Structural Heart Disease.

Authors:  Mathew D Hutchinson; Hyon-He K Garza
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-02-24

8.  Impact of Wideband Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Device-Related Artifacts in Different Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Types.

Authors:  Amita Singh; Wensu Chen; Hena N Patel; Nazia Alvi; Keigo Kawaji; Stephanie A Besser; Roderick Tung; Jiangang Zou; Roberto M Lang; Victor Mor-Avi; Amit R Patel
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Atrial fibrillation and atrial cardiomyopathies.

Authors:  Jayson R Baman; James L Cox; Patrick M McCarthy; Daniel Kim; Ravi B Patel; Rod S Passman; Jane E Wilcox
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Evaluation of image quality of wideband single-shot late gadolinium-enhancement MRI in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device.

Authors:  Sarah M Schwartz; Ashitha Pathrose; Ali M Serhal; Ann B Ragin; Jessica Charron; Bradley P Knight; Rod S Passman; Ryan J Avery; Daniel Kim
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-11-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.