Duc H Do1, Vaughn Eyvazian1, Aileen J Bayoneta2, Peng Hu2, J Paul Finn2, Jason S Bradfield1, Kalyanam Shivkumar1, Noel G Boyle3. 1. UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, UCLA Health System, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California. 2. UCLA Department of Radiology, UCLA Health System, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California. 3. UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, UCLA Health System, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: nboyle@mednet.ucla.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been performed safely in patients without MRI-conditional cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), but experience specifically with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is limited in this patient population. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the safety of CMR in non-MRI-conditional CIEDs and the interpretability of images using wideband sequences. METHODS: We performed 114 consecutive CMR studies in 111 patients (mean age 59 ± 14 years, with 12 pacemakers, 73 implantable cardioverter defibrillators, 29 biventricular defibrillators) using a wideband pulse sequence for late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging. A standardized protocol for device management and patient monitoring was followed. Patients were evaluated for major clinical adverse events and device parameter changes immediately after CMR and at clinical follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 111 CMR studies were completed successfully. There were no patient deaths, new arrhythmias, immediate generator or lead failures, electrical resets, or pacing capture failures in dependent patients. Right atrial, right ventricular, and left ventricular lead impedances were significantly lower post CMR, with median differences -7 Ω (interquartile range [IQR] -20 to 0 Ω; P < .0001), 0 Ω (IQR -19 to 0 Ω; P = .0001), and -10 Ω (IQR -30 to 0 Ω; P = .023), respectively. These changes persisted through the follow-up period, with median differences -18.5 Ω (IQR -41 to -66 Ω; P = .007), -19 Ω (IQR -44 to -7 Ω; P = .006), and -30 Ω (IQR -130 to 0 Ω; P = .003), respectively. Ninety-seven studies (87%) had no artifact limiting interpretation. CONCLUSIONS: CMR can be performed safely in non-MRI-conditional CIEDs using a standardized protocol. Use of a wideband pulse sequence for LGE imaging yields a high rate of studies unaffected by artifact.
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been performed safely in patients without MRI-conditional cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), but experience specifically with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is limited in this patient population. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the safety of CMR in non-MRI-conditional CIEDs and the interpretability of images using wideband sequences. METHODS: We performed 114 consecutive CMR studies in 111 patients (mean age 59 ± 14 years, with 12 pacemakers, 73 implantable cardioverter defibrillators, 29 biventricular defibrillators) using a wideband pulse sequence for late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging. A standardized protocol for device management and patient monitoring was followed. Patients were evaluated for major clinical adverse events and device parameter changes immediately after CMR and at clinical follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 111 CMR studies were completed successfully. There were no patient deaths, new arrhythmias, immediate generator or lead failures, electrical resets, or pacing capture failures in dependent patients. Right atrial, right ventricular, and left ventricular lead impedances were significantly lower post CMR, with median differences -7 Ω (interquartile range [IQR] -20 to 0 Ω; P < .0001), 0 Ω (IQR -19 to 0 Ω; P = .0001), and -10 Ω (IQR -30 to 0 Ω; P = .023), respectively. These changes persisted through the follow-up period, with median differences -18.5 Ω (IQR -41 to -66 Ω; P = .007), -19 Ω (IQR -44 to -7 Ω; P = .006), and -30 Ω (IQR -130 to 0 Ω; P = .003), respectively. Ninety-seven studies (87%) had no artifact limiting interpretation. CONCLUSIONS: CMR can be performed safely in non-MRI-conditional CIEDs using a standardized protocol. Use of a wideband pulse sequence for LGE imaging yields a high rate of studies unaffected by artifact.
Authors: Takeshi Sasaki; Rozann Hansford; Menekhem M Zviman; Aravindan Kolandaivelu; David A Bluemke; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Henry R Halperin; Saman Nazarian Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Francisco Buendía; Óscar Cano; Juan Miguel Sánchez-Gómez; Begoña Igual; Joaquín Osca; María José Sancho-Tello; José Olagüe; Antonio Salvador Journal: Europace Date: 2011-01-11 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Edward T Martin; James A Coman; Frank G Shellock; Christopher C Pulling; Robert Fair; Kim Jenkins Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-04-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Claas P Naehle; Katharina Strach; Daniel Thomas; Carsten Meyer; Markus Linhart; Sascha Bitaraf; Harold Litt; Jörg Otto Schwab; Hans Schild; Torsten Sommer Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-08-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Mario Njeim; Miki Yokokawa; Luba Frank; Thomas Crawford; Eric Good; Fred Morady; Frank Bogun Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2015-11-06
Authors: Sanjay Dandamudi; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; Pat Mongkolwat; Amir A Rahsepar; Todd T Tomson; Nishant Verma; Rishi Arora; Alex B Chicos; Susan S Kim; Albert C Lin; Rod S Passman; Bradley P Knight Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2016-10-04 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Amita Singh; Keigo Kawaji; Neha Goyal; Noreen T Nazir; Andrew Beaser; Virginia O'Keefe-Baker; Karima Addetia; Roderick Tung; Peng Hu; Victor Mor-Avi; Amit R Patel Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Ananna Zaman; Samantha Zhao; Jordana Kron; Antonio Abbate; Anna Tomdio; W Gregory Hundley; Jennifer H Jordan Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2022-08-19 Impact factor: 3.955
Authors: Jayson R Baman; James L Cox; Patrick M McCarthy; Daniel Kim; Ravi B Patel; Rod S Passman; Jane E Wilcox Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Sarah M Schwartz; Ashitha Pathrose; Ali M Serhal; Ann B Ragin; Jessica Charron; Bradley P Knight; Rod S Passman; Ryan J Avery; Daniel Kim Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2020-11-13