Literature DB >> 29769366

Mate choice in the eye and ear of the beholder? Female multimodal sensory configuration influences her preferences.

Kelly L Ronald1,2, Esteban Fernández-Juricic3, Jeffrey R Lucas3.   

Abstract

A common assumption in sexual selection studies is that receivers decode signal information similarly. However, receivers may vary in how they rank signallers if signal perception varies with an individual's sensory configuration. Furthermore, receivers may vary in their weighting of different elements of multimodal signals based on their sensory configuration. This could lead to complex levels of selection on signalling traits. We tested whether multimodal sensory configuration could affect preferences for multimodal signals. We used brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater) females to examine how auditory sensitivity and auditory filters, which influence auditory spectral and temporal resolution, affect song preferences, and how visual spatial resolution and visual temporal resolution, which influence resolution of a moving visual signal, affect visual display preferences. Our results show that multimodal sensory configuration significantly affects preferences for male displays: females with better auditory temporal resolution preferred songs that were shorter, with lower Wiener entropy, and higher frequency; and females with better visual temporal resolution preferred males with less intense visual displays. Our findings provide new insights into mate-choice decisions and receiver signal processing. Furthermore, our results challenge a long-standing assumption in animal communication which can affect how we address honest signalling, assortative mating and sensory drive.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  multimodal sensory processing; preference functions; sexual selection

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29769366      PMCID: PMC5966616          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  44 in total

1.  Variations in cone photoreceptor abundance and the visual ecology of birds.

Authors:  N S Hart
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Intraspecific cone opsin expression variation in the cichlids of Lake Malawi.

Authors:  Adam R Smith; Lindsay D'Annunzio; Abbi E Smith; Anit Sharma; Christopher M Hofmann; N J Marshall; Karen L Carleton
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Ready steady slow: action preparation slows the subjective passage of time.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Hagura; Ryota Kanai; Guido Orgs; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Using electroretinograms to assess flicker fusion frequency in domestic hens Gallus gallus domesticus.

Authors:  Thomas J Lisney; Björn Ekesten; Ragnar Tauson; Olle Håstad; Anders Odeen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Avian retinal oil droplets: dietary manipulation of colour vision?

Authors:  Ben Knott; Mathew L Berg; Eric R Morgan; Katherine L Buchanan; James K Bowmaker; Andrew T D Bennett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Complex mate searching in the satin bowerbird Ptilonorhynchus violaceus.

Authors:  J A Uy; G L Patricelli; G Borgia
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Reproductive hormones modify reception of species-typical communication signals in a female anuran.

Authors:  Kathleen S Lynch; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 1.808

8.  Mate choice for a male carotenoid-based ornament is linked to female dietary carotenoid intake and accumulation.

Authors:  Matthew B Toomey; Kevin J McGraw
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Individual variation in cone photoreceptor density in house sparrows: implications for between-individual differences in visual resolution and chromatic contrast.

Authors:  Amanda L Ensminger; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Female brain size affects the assessment of male attractiveness during mate choice.

Authors:  Alberto Corral-López; Natasha I Bloch; Alexander Kotrschal; Wouter van der Bijl; Severine D Buechel; Judith E Mank; Niclas Kolm
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  2 in total

1.  Darwin, sexual selection, and the brain.

Authors:  Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Exploiting common senses: sensory ecology meets wildlife conservation and management.

Authors:  Laura K Elmer; Christine L Madliger; Daniel T Blumstein; Chris K Elvidge; Esteban Fernández-Juricic; Andrij Z Horodysky; Nicholas S Johnson; Liam P McGuire; Ronald R Swaisgood; Steven J Cooke
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.079

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.