Literature DB >> 21213049

Computed tomography angiography in children with cardiovascular disease: low dose techniques and image quality.

S Bruce Greenberg1, Sadaf Bhutta, Leah Braswell, Frandics Chan.   

Abstract

Dose reduction techniques for computed tomography angiography (CTA) in children with cardiovascular diseases have the potential of reducing risks of radiation-induced cancer. To evaluate effectiveness of these techniques, both radiation dose and image quality must be compared. While clinically practical methods of estimating effective dose are available, there are no generally accepted metrics for the assessment of image quality in CTA. We introduce a measurable and reproducible image quality index, CTA QI. Using this index, along with calculated effective dose, we test the hypothesis that volume scan CTA delivers comparable image quality at substantially reduced radiation dose when compared to helical CTA. CTA QI is a measure of intraluminal contrast variation in three-dimensions, and it is calculated from standardized measurements of means and standard deviations of Hounsfield units in the thoracic descending aorta. From institutional database, 83 studies of CTA for thoracic cardiovascular diseases were retrospectively identified. CTA QI values were independently measured by two radiologists and compared using correlation. CTA QI and DLP-derived effective dose were compared for the following groups: non-cardiac gated wide-detector and helical CTA, ECG-synchronized retrospective wide-detector and helical CTA, ECG-synchronized wide detector retrospective and target technique CTA. Statistical significance was evaluated with the Student-t test. The correlations of CTA QI values between the radiologists were 0.83 and 0.92 for non-gated studies and ECG-synchronized studies respectively. Comparing non-gated volume scan CTA to helical CTA, there was a radiation dose reduction of 69% (P < 0.0001) without a significant change in CTA QI (1.4 ± 1.0 vs. 1.9 ± 1.4, P = 0.13). Comparing retrospective ECG-synchronized wide-detector CTA to helical CTA, there was a radiation dose reduction of 46% (P < 0.0001) with and improvement in CTA QI (1.0 ± 0.8 vs. 3.7 ± 3.4, P < 0.01). Comparing ECG-synchronized wide-detector target CTA to retrospective CTA, there was a radiation dose reduction of 68% (P < 0.0001, but at the cost of a significant reduction in CTA QI (2.0 ± 1.0 vs. 0.8 ± 0.4, P < 0.0044). CTA QI is a simple, reproducible metric of image quality suited for comparing CTA studies. Using this quality index, we establish that CTA performed with wide-detector scan techniques can yield substantially lower radiation dose without compromising diagnostic imaging quality. A wide-detector target technique can further reduce effective dose compared to wide-detector retrospective ECG-synchronization, but with a reduction in image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21213049     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-010-9782-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  13 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric computed tomographic angiography: imaging the cardiovascular system gently.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Hellinger; Andres Pena; Michael Poon; Frandics P Chan; Monica Epelman
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 2.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Pediatric chest MDCT using tube current modulation: effect on radiation dose with breast shielding.

Authors:  Courtney Coursey; Donald P Frush; Terry Yoshizumi; Greta Toncheva; Giao Nguyen; S Bruce Greenberg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a review.

Authors:  Takeshi Kubo; Pei-Jan Paul Lin; Wolfram Stiller; Masaya Takahashi; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Yoshiharu Ohno; Hiroto Hatabu
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Age-specific effective doses for pediatric MSCT examinations at a large children's hospital using DLP conversion coefficients: a simple estimation method.

Authors:  Karen E Thomas; Bo Wang
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-04-08

6.  Evaluation of a radiation dose reduction strategy for pediatric chest CT.

Authors:  Jee-Eun Kim; Beverley Newman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Kwang-Pyo Kim; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Rebecca Lewis; Fred Mettler; Charles Land
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-14

8.  Effect of recent changes in atomic bomb survivor dosimetry on cancer mortality risk estimates.

Authors:  Dale L Preston; Donald A Pierce; Yukiko Shimizu; Harry M Cullings; Shoichiro Fujita; Sachiyo Funamoto; Kazunori Kodama
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Pediatric body MDCT: a 5-year follow-up survey of scanning parameters used by pediatric radiologists.

Authors:  Michael E Arch; Donald P Frush
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 10.  Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Andrew N Primak; Natalie Braun; James Kofler; Lifeng Yu; Jodie Christner
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.303

View more
  6 in total

1.  Rebalancing the risks of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Bruce Greenberg
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-05-28

2.  Comparison of radiation dose estimates, image noise, and scan duration in pediatric body imaging for volumetric and helical modes on 320-detector CT and helical mode on 64-detector CT.

Authors:  Jennifer H Johnston; Daniel J Podberesky; Terry T Yoshizumi; Erin Angel; Greta Toncheva; David B Larson; John C Egelhoff; Colin Anderson-Evans; Giao B Nguyen; Alessandra Barelli; Christopher Alsip; Shelia R Salisbury; Donald P Frush
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-05-01

3.  Prevalence of non-cardiovascular findings on CT angiography in children with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Archana Malik; Jeffrey C Hellinger; Sabah Servaes; Mathew C Schwartz; Marc S Keller; Monica Epelman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-12-06

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging in women with pelvic pain from gynaecological causes: a pictorial review.

Authors:  A L Valentini; B Gui; R Basilico; I V Di Molfetta; M Miccò; L Bonomo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  Radiologic evaluation of coronary artery disease in adults with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  David M Valenzuela; Karen G Ordovas
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Non-cardiovascular findings on chest CT angiography in children with congenital heart disease: How important are they?

Authors:  Yaotse Elikplim Nordjoe; Suzanne Rita Aubin Igombe; Latifa Chat
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 1.930

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.