Literature DB >> 21203854

Qualitative and quantitative assessment of metal artifacts arising from implantable cardiac pacing devices in oncological PET/CT studies: a phantom study.

Mohammad R Ay1, Abolfazl Mehranian, Mehrsima Abdoli, Pardis Ghafarian, Habib Zaidi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluate the magnitude of metallic artifacts caused by various implantable cardiac pacing devices (without leads) on both attenuation maps (μ-maps) and positron emission tomography (PET) images using experimental phantom studies. We also assess the efficacy of a metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm along with the severity of artifacts in the presence of misalignment between μ-maps and PET images.
METHODS: Four pacing devices including two pacemakers (pacemakers 1 and 2) and two cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices of pacemaker (CRT-P) and defibrillator (CRT-D) type were placed in three phantoms including a cylindrical Ge-68 phantom, a water-bath phantom and an anthropomorphic heart/thorax phantom. The μ-maps were derived from computed tomography (CT) images reconstructed using the standard method supplied by the manufacturer and those reconstructed using the MAR algorithm. In addition, the standard reconstructed CT images of the last two phantoms were manually misaligned by 10 mm along the patient's axis to simulate misalignment between CT and PET images.
RESULTS: The least and severest artifacts produced on both μ-maps and PET images of the Ge-68 phantom were induced by CRT-P and pacemaker 1 devices, respectively. In the water-bath phantom, CRT-P induced 17.5% over- and 9.2% underestimation of tracer uptake whereas pacemaker 1 induced 69.6% over- and 65.7% underestimation. In the heart/thorax phantom representing a pacemaker-bearing patient, pacemaker 1 induced 41.8% increase and 36.6% decrease in tracer uptake and attenuation coefficients on average in regions corresponding to bright and dark streak artifacts, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed that the MAR algorithm was successful in reducing bright streak artifacts, yet unsuccessful for dark ones. In the heart/thorax phantom, the MAR algorithm reduced the overestimations to 4.4% and the underestimations to 35.5% on average. Misalignment between μ-maps and PET images increased the peak of pseudo-uptake by approximately 20%.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that, depending on their elemental composition, different implantable cardiac pacing devices result in varying magnitudes of metal artifacts and thus pseudo-uptake on PET images. The MAR algorithm was not successful in compensating for underestimations which calls for a more efficient algorithm. The results showed that misalignments between PET and CT images render metal-related pseudo-uptake more severe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21203854     DOI: 10.1007/s11307-010-0467-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  22 in total

1.  Impact of metallic dental implants on CT-based attenuation correction in a combined PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  EhabI M Kamel; Cyrill Burger; Alfred Buck; GustavI K von Schulthess; GerhardI W Goerres
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-08-23       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Combined 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging of the head and neck. An approach to metal artifact correction.

Authors:  K P Schäfers; R Raupach; T Beyer
Journal:  Nuklearmedizin       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.379

3.  A segmentation-based method for metal artifact reduction.

Authors:  Hengyong Yu; Kai Zeng; Deepak K Bharkhada; Ge Wang; Mark T Madsen; Osama Saba; Bruno Policeni; Matthew A Howard; Wendy R K Smoker
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  High-density materials do not always induce artifacts on PET/CT: what is responsible for the difference?

Authors:  Tomohiro Kaneta; Kentaro Takanami; Yuji Wakayama; Akihiro Sato; Shuichi Higano; Hiroshi Fukuda; Shogo Yamada; Shoki Takahashi
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.690

Review 5.  Transmission scanning in emission tomography.

Authors:  D L Bailey
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1998-07

Review 6.  Advances in Attenuation Correction Techniques in PET.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Marie-Louise Montandon; Abass Alavi
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2008-02-15

7.  Artifactual 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose localization surrounding metallic objects in a PET/CT scanner using CT-based attenuation correction.

Authors:  Steve Bujenovic; Finn Mannting; Ranjit Chakrabarti; Darren Ladnier
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Do implanted pacemaker leads and ICD leads cause metal-related artifact in cardiac PET/CT?

Authors:  Frank P DiFilippo; Richard C Brunken
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Does reducing CT artifacts from dental implants influence the PET interpretation in PET/CT studies of oral cancer and head and neck cancer?

Authors:  Claude Nahmias; Catherine Lemmens; David Faul; Eric Carlson; Misty Long; Todd Blodgett; Johan Nuyts; David Townsend
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Cardiac device implantation in the United States from 1997 through 2004: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Chunliu Zhan; William B Baine; Artyom Sedrakyan; Claudia Steiner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  2 in total

1.  Respiratory-induced errors in tumor quantification and delineation in CT attenuation-corrected PET images: effects of tumor size, tumor location, and respiratory trace: a simulation study using the 4D XCAT phantom.

Authors:  Parham Geramifar; Mojtaba Shamsaie Zafarghandi; Pardis Ghafarian; Arman Rahmim; Mohammad Reza Ay
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Clinical evaluation of a commercial orthopedic metal artifact reduction tool for CT simulations in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Hua Li; Camille Noel; Haijian Chen; H Harold Li; Daniel Low; Kevin Moore; Paul Klahr; Jeff Michalski; Hiram A Gay; Wade Thorstad; Sasa Mutic
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.071

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.