| Literature DB >> 21200436 |
Catherine Gallou-Kabani1, Anne Gabory, Jörg Tost, Mohsen Karimi, Sylvain Mayeur, Jean Lesage, Elsa Boudadi, Marie-Sylvie Gross, Julien Taurelle, Alexandre Vigé, Christophe Breton, Brigitte Reusens, Claude Remacle, Didier Vieau, Tomas J Ekström, Jean-Philippe Jais, Claudine Junien.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Changes in imprinted gene dosage in the placenta may compromise the prenatal control of nutritional resources. Indeed monoallelic behaviour and sensitivity to changes in regional epigenetic state render imprinted genes both vulnerable and adaptable. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21200436 PMCID: PMC3006175 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014398
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Foetal and placental weights in the high-fat diet mouse model.
| Female on CD(n = 110) | Female on HFD (n = 81) | Male on CD(n = 99) | Male on HFD (n = 103) |
|
|
| |
|
| 0.439±0.006 | 0.448±0.006 | 0.453±0.007 | 0.454±0.005 | NS | NS | NS |
|
| 0.116±0.002 | 0.123±0.002 | 0.127±0.002 | 0.137±0.002 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | NS |
|
| 3.846±0.058 | 3.714±0.074 | 3.629±0.070 | 3.378±0.062 | 0.0039 | <0.0001 | NS |
Values are expressed as means ± SEM and statistical significance is expressed as a p value from two-way ANOVA with post-hoc testing. NS: Not significant.
Placental mRNA levels for 17 candidate genes, determined by RT-qPCR, in the high-fat diet mouse model.
| Gene | Chromosome | Allele expression | Placenta-specificimprint | Female on CD(n = 6 pools) | Female on HFD(n = 7 pools) | Male on CD(n = 6 pools) | Male on HFD(n = 7 pools) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 18S RNA was used as an endogenous control, to normalise the amount of template for each gene. Values are expressed as means ± SEM and statistical significance is expressed as a p value following two-way ANOVA with post-hoc testing. Superscripts indicate significant differences between groups with the same superscript in post-hoc tests:
: 0.0413;
: 0.0303,
: 0.0426,
: 0.0499,
: 0.0421,
: 0.0179,
: 0.0130,
: 0.0222,
: 0.0001.
NS: Not significant.
Figure 1Linear discriminant supervised clustering analysis.
The five genes mapping to chromosome 17 for which RT-qPCR was carried out (Slc22a1, Slc22a2, Slc22a3, Igf2r, Air) were studied by a linear discriminant approach. (A) Pooled results from individuals were projected onto the first two discriminant axes, which accounted for 99.6% of the inter-class variability. Inertia ellipses represent intra-class variability for each group. Discrimination power increases with the compactness and distance of the ellipses. (B) The correlation circle indicates the contribution of the five genes to the discriminant axes.
Figure 2Analysis of gene expression by in situ hybridization.
Detection by in situ hybridisation of Slc22a3 (A), Dlk1 (B) and Rtl1 (C) in of the placentae of female (F) or male (M) mouse embryos from mothers fed a control (CD) or high fat (HFD) diet. No difference in the distribution of these RNAs was observed, all of which were restricted to the labyrinth layer. The histograms (D) show the proportion of the labyrinth, this area being similar between the four groups.
Figure 3Schematic diagram of the Igf2r region on mouse chromosome 17.
(A), Box plot representing global methylation (B), specific CpG2 (C), sexual dimorphism under HFD (D), and sexual dimorphism under CD (E) obtained by bisulphite sequencing analysis of the DMR Igf2r encompassing 30 CpGs. The 30 CpGs are underlined. CpGs displaying sex-specific methylation under HFD and CD are shown in bold. Differences between methylation profiles were analysed by Mann-Whitney tests (p<0.05). F = female, M = male.
Figure 4Box plot representing global methylation of the genome.
Results obtained by LUMA, in five different tissues from six-month-old mice on the CD (liver, muscle, kidney, testis and placenta) at E15.5 (A), and from the placentae of female and male foetuses from mothers fed the CD or the HFD (B). Differences between methylation profiles were analysed by Mann-Whitney tests (p<0.05). Completely unmethylated DNA would have an HpaII/MspI ratio of 1.0, whereas 100% methylated DNA would have an HpaII/MspI ratio close to zero [121].
Bisulphite pyrosequencing analysis of repeated B1 and LINE sequences.
| Regions | PCR primers | Productlength | Hybridization temperature (°C) | Sequencingprimers | CpGnumber | Sequencelength |
|
|
| 147 | 69 |
| 3 | 45 |
|
|
| 262 | 61 |
| 6 | 63 |
|
| 5 | 35 | ||||
|
| 2 | 38 |