OBJECTIVE: Maternal protein restriction has been shown to have deleterious effects on placental development, and has long-term consequences for the progeny. We tested the hypothesis that, by the use of microarray technology, we could identify specific genes and cellular pathways in the developing placenta that are responsive to maternal protein deprivation, and propose a potential mechanism for observed gene expression changes. METHODS: We fed pregnant FVB/NJ mice from day post-coitum 10.5 (DPC10.5) to DPC17.5, an isocaloric diet containing 50% less protein than normal chow. We used the Affymetrix Mouse 430A_2.0 array to measure gene expression changes in the placenta. We functionally annotated the regulated genes, and examined over-represented functional categories and performed pathway analysis. For selected genes, we confirmed the microarray results by use of qPCR. RESULTS: We observed 244 probe sets, corresponding to 235 genes, regulated by protein restriction (p<0.001), with ninety-one genes being up-regulated, and 153 down-regulated. Up-regulated genes included those involved in the p53 pathway, apoptosis, negative regulators of cell growth, negative regulators of cell metabolism and genes related to epigenetic control. Down-regulated genes included those involved in nucleotide metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: Microarray analysis has allowed us to describe the genetic response to maternal protein deprivation in the mouse placenta. We observed that negative regulators of cell growth and metabolism in conjunction with genes involved in epigenesis were up-regulated, suggesting that protein deprivation may contribute to growth restriction and long-term epigenetic changes in stressed tissues and organs. The challenge will be to understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms of these gene expression responses.
OBJECTIVE: Maternal protein restriction has been shown to have deleterious effects on placental development, and has long-term consequences for the progeny. We tested the hypothesis that, by the use of microarray technology, we could identify specific genes and cellular pathways in the developing placenta that are responsive to maternal protein deprivation, and propose a potential mechanism for observed gene expression changes. METHODS: We fed pregnant FVB/NJ mice from day post-coitum 10.5 (DPC10.5) to DPC17.5, an isocaloric diet containing 50% less protein than normal chow. We used the Affymetrix Mouse 430A_2.0 array to measure gene expression changes in the placenta. We functionally annotated the regulated genes, and examined over-represented functional categories and performed pathway analysis. For selected genes, we confirmed the microarray results by use of qPCR. RESULTS: We observed 244 probe sets, corresponding to 235 genes, regulated by protein restriction (p<0.001), with ninety-one genes being up-regulated, and 153 down-regulated. Up-regulated genes included those involved in the p53 pathway, apoptosis, negative regulators of cell growth, negative regulators of cell metabolism and genes related to epigenetic control. Down-regulated genes included those involved in nucleotide metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: Microarray analysis has allowed us to describe the genetic response to maternal protein deprivation in the mouse placenta. We observed that negative regulators of cell growth and metabolism in conjunction with genes involved in epigenesis were up-regulated, suggesting that protein deprivation may contribute to growth restriction and long-term epigenetic changes in stressed tissues and organs. The challenge will be to understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms of these gene expression responses.
Authors: J McMinn; M Wei; N Schupf; J Cusmai; E B Johnson; A C Smith; R Weksberg; H M Thaker; B Tycko Journal: Placenta Date: 2005-08-24 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Rebecca C Painter; Susanne R de Rooij; Patrick M Bossuyt; Timothy A Simmers; Clive Osmond; David J Barker; Otto P Bleker; Tessa J Roseboom Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: R C Painter; S R De Rooij; P M M Bossuyt; C Osmond; D J P Barker; O P Bleker; T J Roseboom Journal: Am J Hum Biol Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.937
Authors: Fabio Sgarbosa; Luis Fernando Barbisan; Maria A M Brasil; Elaine Costa; Iracema M P Calderon; Cláudia R Gonçalves; Estela Bevilacqua; Marilza V C Rudge Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2006-03-24 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Rebecca C Painter; Tessa J Roseboom; Gert A van Montfrans; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Raymond T Krediet; Clive Osmond; David J P Barker; Otto P Bleker Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2004-11-17 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Sophia Ouhilal; Patricia Vuguin; Lingguang Cui; Xiu-Quan Du; Richard W Gelling; Sandra E Reznik; Robert Russell; Albert F Parlow; Clara Karpovsky; Nanette Santoro; Maureen J Charron Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-12-13 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Yu Yang; Alan Bolnick; Alexandra Shamir; Mohammed Abdulhasan; Quanwen Li; G C Parker; Elizabeth E Puscheck; D A Rappolee Journal: Stem Cell Rev Rep Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 5.739
Authors: Paranthaman SenthamaraiKannan; Maureen A Sartor; Kyle T O'Connor; Jonathan C Neumann; James P Klyza; Paul A Succop; Brad D Wagner; Saikumar Karyala; Mario Medvedovic; Anil G Menon Journal: Physiol Genomics Date: 2011-01-04 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Jiude Mao; Xia Zhang; Paizlee T Sieli; Michael T Falduto; Karen E Torres; Cheryl S Rosenfeld Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-03-08 Impact factor: 11.205