Literature DB >> 12906182

Prostate boundary segmentation from 3D ultrasound images.

Ning Hu1, Dónal B Downey, Aaron Fenster, Hanif M Ladak.   

Abstract

Segmenting, or outlining the prostate boundary is an important task in the management of patients with prostate cancer. In this paper, an algorithm is described for semiautomatic segmentation of the prostate from 3D ultrasound images. The algorithm uses model-based initialization and mesh refinement using an efficient deformable model. Initialization requires the user to select only six points from which the outline of the prostate is estimated using shape information. The estimated outline is then automatically deformed to better fit the prostate boundary. An editing tool allows the user to edit the boundary in problematic regions and then deform the model again to improve the final results. The algorithm requires less than 1 min on a Pentium III 400 MHz PC. The accuracy of the algorithm was assessed by comparing the algorithm results, obtained from both local and global analysis, to the manual segmentations on six prostates. The local difference was mapped on the surface of the algorithm boundary to produce a visual representation. Global error analysis showed that the average difference between manual and algorithm boundaries was -0.20 +/- 0.28 mm, the average absolute difference was 1.19 +/- 0.14 mm, the average maximum difference was 7.01 +/- 1.04 mm, and the average volume difference was 7.16% +/- 3.45%. Variability in manual and algorithm segmentation was also assessed: Visual representations of local variability were generated by mapping variability on the segmentation mesh. The mean variability in manual segmentation was 0.98 mm and in algorithm segmentation was 0.63 mm and the differences of about 51.5% of the points comprising the average algorithm boundary are insignificant (P < or = 0.01) to the manual average boundary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12906182     DOI: 10.1118/1.1586267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  16 in total

1.  Bladder segmentation in MRI images using active region growing model.

Authors:  Carole Garnier; Wu Ke; Jean-Louis Dillenseger
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

2.  3D ultrasound image segmentation using wavelet support vector machines.

Authors:  Hamed Akbari; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  ΤND: a thyroid nodule detection system for analysis of ultrasound images and videos.

Authors:  Eystratios G Keramidas; Dimitris Maroulis; Dimitris K Iakovidis
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Prostate segmentation in HIFU therapy.

Authors:  Carole Garnier; Jean-Jacques Bellanger; Ke Wu; Huazhong Shu; Nathalie Costet; Romain Mathieu; Renaud de Crevoisier; Jean-Louis Coatrieux
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  A magnetic resonance spectroscopy driven initialization scheme for active shape model based prostate segmentation.

Authors:  Robert Toth; Pallavi Tiwari; Mark Rosen; Galen Reed; John Kurhanewicz; Arjun Kalyanpur; Sona Pungavkar; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Three-dimensional nonrigid landmark-based magnetic resonance to transrectal ultrasound registration for image-guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Yue Sun; Wu Qiu; Jing Yuan; Cesare Romagnoli; Aaron Fenster
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-06-24

7.  Three-dimensional ultrasound scanning.

Authors:  Aaron Fenster; Grace Parraga; Jeff Bax
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  A coupled global registration and segmentation framework with application to magnetic resonance prostate imagery.

Authors:  Yi Gao; Romeil Sandhu; Gabor Fichtinger; Allen Robert Tannenbaum
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Simulation of autonomous robotic multiple-core biopsy by 3D ultrasound guidance.

Authors:  Kaicheng Liang; Albert J Rogers; Edward D Light; Daniel Von Allmen; Stephen W Smith
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.578

10.  Correlations between the various methods of estimating prostate volume: transabdominal, transrectal, and three-dimensional US.

Authors:  Sun Ho Kim; Seung Hyup Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.