| Literature DB >> 21184676 |
David E Alquezar1, Stephane Hemmerter, Robert D Cooper, Nigel W Beebe.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA) genes and transcribed spacers are highly utilized as taxonomic markers in metazoans despite the lack of a cohesive understanding of their evolution. Here we follow the evolution of the rDNA second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) and the mitochondrial DNA cytochrome oxidase I subunit in the malaria mosquito Anopheles longirostris from Papua New Guinea (PNG). This morphospecies inhabits a variety of ecological environments indicating that it may comprise a complex of morphologically indistinguishable species. Using collections from over 70 sites in PNG, the mtDNA was assessed via direct DNA sequencing while the ITS2 was assessed at three levels - crude sequence variation through restriction digest, intragenomic copy variant organisation (homogenisation) through heteroduplex analysis and DNA sequencing via cloning.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21184676 PMCID: PMC3022607 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-392
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Summary of mosquito collection sites in PNG
| Map | Year | Latitudes | Longitudes | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1993/2 | -3.82139 | 141.4575 | 12 |
| 2 | 1993/3 | -3.3483 | 141.3457 | 1 |
| 3 | 1993/5 | -3.41618 | 141.2422 | 12 |
| 4 | 1993/6 | -4.14264 | 141.2604 | 2 |
| 5 | 1993/8 | -4.34685 | 141.6606 | 1 |
| 6 | 1993/10 | -3.97867 | 141.654 | 12 |
| 7 | 1993/14 | -3.38709 | 141.586 | 14 |
| 8 | 1993/17 | -3.10225 | 141.2592 | 2 |
| 9 | 1993/22 | -3.81907 | 141.0429 | 1 |
| 10 | 1993/23 | -3.8498 | 142.061 | 3 |
| 11 | 1993/27 | -3.83852 | 142.3608 | 10 |
| 12 | 1993/32 | -4.27391 | 142.1417 | 1 |
| 13 | 1993/42 | -3.96715 | 141.2027 | 2 |
| 14 | 1993/43 | -3.93283 | 142.2043 | 10 |
| 15 | 1993/45 | -3.82202 | 141.8232 | 2 |
| 16 | 1993/47 | -3.20563 | 142.1934 | 1 |
| 17 | 1993/49 | -2.83613 | 146.226 | 1 |
| 18 | 1993/53 | -3.04691 | 141.6254 | 5 |
| 19 | 1993/54 | -2.98728 | 141.4841 | 4 |
| 20 | 1993/99 | -3.87055 | 143.7083 | 5 |
| 21 | 1994/52 | -7.94629 | 145.9866 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994/53 | -7.86491 | 145.6693 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994/62 | -7.94385 | 146.1063 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995/86 | -4.55097 | 145.1288 | 0 (4) |
| 25 | 1992/68 | -6.10497 | 141.3719 | 0 (1) |
| 26 | 1992/63 | -5.99314 | 141.1222 | 4 |
| 27 | 1992/79 | -5.73255 | 141.9284 | 3 |
| 28 | 1992/71 | -5.79571 | 141.0625 | 3 |
| 29 | 1992/70 | -5.11318 | 141.1066 | 4 |
| 30 | 1992/62 | -6.31728 | 141.0249 | 12 |
| 31 | 1992/28 | -8.14579 | 141.983 | 6 |
| 32 | 1992/65 | -6.1281 | 141.2741 | 1 |
| 33 | 1994/63 | -7.58825 | 143.687 | 1 |
| 34 | 1995/1 | -5.29123 | 145.7411 | 1 |
| 35 | 1995/118 | -5.21938 | 145.5545 | 1 |
| 36 | 1995/18 | -3.89964 | 143.9252 | 1 |
| 37 | 1995/34 | -4.63884 | 143.6642 | 1 |
| 38 | 1995/35 | -4.62367 | 143.6128 | 1 |
| 39 | 1995/74 | -4.61152 | 145.4955 | 4 |
| 40 | 1995/75 | -4.86588 | 145.6067 | 1 |
| 41 | 1995/78 | -4.3246 | 145.0033 | 1 |
| 42 | 1995/90 | -4.60145 | 145.4423 | 3 |
| 43 | 1995/98 | -4.20768 | 144.448955 | 5 |
| 44 | 1995/111 | -4.71896 | 144.4958 | 3 |
| 45 | 1995/114 | -4.98081 | 144.9456 | 4 |
| 46 | 1995/120 | -5.12045 | 145.4077 | 2 |
| 47 | 1995/123 | -5.46082 | 145.2102 | 1 |
| 48 | 1995/125 | -5.56242 | 146.1766 | 0 (1) |
| 49 | 1995/130 | -4.78272 | 145.6285 | 3 |
| 50 | 1995/134 | -5.59874 | 146.2804 | 1 |
| 51 | 1995/138 | -5.11788 | 145.4628 | 2 |
| 52 | 1995/157 | -5.07679 | 144.7181 | 1 |
| 53 | 1997/122 | -10.1185 | 148.296 | 1 |
| 54 | 1997/128 | -10.1015 | 148.4675 | 1 |
| 55 | 1998/171 | -9.62046 | 149.4318 | 1 |
| 56 | 1998/183 | -8.81208 | 148.4748 | 1 |
| 57 | 1993/76 | -4.06985 | 143.2562 | 9 (2) |
| 58 | 1995/137 | -5.23905 | 145.4598 | 11 (1) |
| 59 | 1995/4 | -5.29396 | 145.7483 | 10 (2) |
| 60 | 1995/7 | -5.28947 | 145.7628 | 11 (1) |
| 61 | 1995/15 | -5.4142 | 145.7264 | 11 (1) |
| 62 | 1995/77 | -4.91868 | 145.7815 | 12 |
| 63 | 1995/88 | -4.87637 | 145.0901 | 1 |
| 64 | 1995/89 | -4.6723 | 145.5873 | 12 |
| 65 | 1995/81 | -4.56498 | 145.3099 | 10 (2) |
| 66 | 1995/86 | -4.55097 | 145.1288 | 1 |
| 67 | 1995/106 | -4.6723 | 145.5873 | 12 |
| 68 | 1995/132 | -5.07245 | 145.0517 | 4 |
| 69 | 1995/136 | -5.48847 | 145.7741 | 3 (1) |
| 70 | 1996/75 | -6.57615 | 146.8209 | 11 |
| 71 | 1995/158 | -5.33051 | 144.8912 | 1 |
| 72 | 1996/136 | -5.53449 | 145.3597 | 1 |
| 73 | 1993/54 | -2.98728 | 141.4841 | 2 |
| 74 | 1993/70 | -4.61974 | 143.4462 | 3 |
| 75 | 1993/94 | -3.76457 | 143.1519 | 1 |
| 76 | 1993/98 | -3.78299 | 143.3662 | 1 |
*Numbers in parentheses are mosquitoes morphologically misidentified as A. longirostris.
Figure 1Map of Papua New Guinea showing collections sites of .
Figure 2ITS2 genotypes of . Panel A: ITS2 PCR products run through a 1.0% agarose gel indicate some small size variation. Panel B: The same ITS2 PCR products cut with Msp I and run through a 3.0% agarose gel reveals eight distinct RFLP genotype profiles. Panel C: Most ITS2-RFLP genotypes revealed the same heteroduplex profile when PCR products were run through a 7.0% acrylamide gel suggesting copy variants are fixed within individuals and within interbreeding populations. However, genotype C contained two distinct heteroduplex profiles (designated C1 and C2) within its RFLP profile revealing the presence of two independently evolving ITS2 genotypes.
ITS2 genotype distribution and abundance summary
| ITS2 RFLP Genotype | Number of specimens | Frequency (%) | Map site |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genotype A | 4 | 1.3 | 6 |
| Genotype B | 25 | 8.2 | 1, 4, 6, 7, 13, 15, 33, 37, 38, 73, 74 |
| Genotype C1 | 11 | 3.6 | 1, 3 |
| Genotype C2 | 170 | 56.3 | 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 16, 17, 18, 26, 28, 30, 36, 40, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 50, 52, 55, 57, 58, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 66, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72 |
| Genotype D | 24 | 7.9 | 3, 5, 7, 18, 19, 30, 32, 57, 75 |
| Genotype E | 38 | 12.1 | 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 20, 34, 39, 42, 49, 50, 58, 64, 67, 70, 76 |
| Genotype F | 8 | 2.6 | 23, 31, 53 |
| Genotype G | 17 | 5.6 | 7, 9, 11, 27, 29 |
| Genotype H | 5 | 2.6 | 26, 30 |
Sympatric ITS2 genotypes
| Collection Site | Sympatric Genotypes |
|---|---|
| 1 | B, C1, C2 |
| 3 | C2, D |
| 5 | C1, C2, D |
| 6 | A, B |
| 7 | B, C1, C2, D E, G |
| 11 | C2, E, G |
| 15 | B, C2 |
| 30 | C2, D |
| 57 | C, D |
| 58 | C, E |
| 64 | C, E |
| 67 | C2, E |
| 70 | C, E |
Summary of ITS2 genotype cloning and DNA sequencing
| Individual | Year/Site | Number of clones# | Total clones per Genotype | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotype A | 1A6-1 | 1993/10 | 5 | |
| 1A6-3 | 1993/10 | 5 | 14 | |
| 1A6-4 | 1993/10 | 3 | ||
| Genotype B | 1A4-1 | 1993/6 | 5 | |
| 1D9-1 | 1995/35 | 4 | 9 | |
| Genotype C1 | 1A1-9 | 1993/2 | 5 | |
| 1A1-1 | 1993/2 | 4 | 14 | |
| 1A1-7 | 1993/2 | 5 | ||
| Genotype C2 | 1A3-10 | 1993/5 | 5 | |
| 1A3-7 | 1993/5 | 3 | 13 | |
| 1A3-1 | 1993/5 | 5 | ||
| Genotype D | 1G2-1 | 1993/76 | 5 | |
| 1A3-2 | 1993/5 | 3 | 12 | |
| 1B8-3 | 1993/53 | 5 | ||
| Genotype E | 1B10-3 | 1993/99 | 5 | |
| 1B1-1 | 1993/27 | 5 | 10 | |
| Genotype F | 1C3-1 | 1994/62 | 5 | |
| 1D1-5 | 1992/28 | 5 | 16 | |
| 1F4-1 | 1997/122 | 5 | ||
| Genotype G | 1A7-4 | 1993/14 | 5 | |
| 1B1-8 | 1993/27 | 4 | 14 | |
| 1C7-1 | 1992/79 | 5 | ||
| Genotype H* | L1C6_1 | 1992/63 | ||
| L1C6_2 | 1992/63 | |||
| L1C6_3 | 1992/63 | |||
GenBank sequences [GU247052 - GU247114].
*Genotype H showed no copy variant heteroduplex profiles and could be directly sequenced.
ITS2 genetic analysis summary
| ITS2 | RFLP band sizes (bp) | ITS2 sequence | mtDNA COI haplotypes |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 200 | ||
| 170 | |||
| 155 | |||
| 125 | |||
| B | 312 | ||
| 225 | |||
| < 100 | |||
| C1 | 181 | ||
| 140 | |||
| 125 | |||
| 112 | |||
| C2 | 181 | ||
| 125 | |||
| 140 | |||
| 112 | |||
| D | 187 | ||
| 156 | |||
| 148 | |||
| 130 | |||
| E | 156 | ||
| 142 | |||
| 125 | |||
| 108 | |||
| < 100 | |||
| F | 162 | ||
| 149 | |||
| 136 | |||
| 126 | |||
| < 100 | |||
| G | 155 | ||
| 136 | |||
| 125 | |||
| 106 | |||
| < 100 | |||
| H | 204 | * | H1C63 - |
| 174 | |||
| 155 | |||
| 149 | |||
| 124 | |||
* No copy variants evident in PCR product
Figure 3Phylogenetic assessment of . Both Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood procedures produced trees of similar topology with branch support values above 70% shown - Bayesian posterior probability above the branch (converted to percentage) and Maximum Likelihood bootstrapping (percentage) below the branch. The ITS2 showed a well resolved tree with all clades well separated into genotypes. All ITS2 genotypes were evident as mtDNA COI divergent lineages with cloned individuals co- assessed for the COI.