Literature DB >> 17057242

Reduced recombination rate and genetic differentiation between the M and S forms of Anopheles gambiae s.s.

Michel A Slotman1, Lisa J Reimer, Tara Thiemann, Guimogo Dolo, Etienne Fondjo, Gregory C Lanzaro.   

Abstract

Genetic differentiation between the largely sympatric molecular forms M and S of Anopheles gambiae appears mostly limited to division 6 and part of division 5 of the X chromosome. This region is adjacent to the centromere and includes the rDNA that was used to define these forms. This localized differentiation between populations that experience gene flow strongly suggests that this region contains genes responsible for reproductive isolation. Regions adjacent to centromeres are known to experience less recombination in several species and it has recently been suggested that low recombination rates can facilitate the accumulation and maintenance of isolation genes in partially isolated populations. Therefore, we measured the recombination rate in division 5D/6 directly and estimate that it is at least 16-fold reduced across this region compared to the remainder of the X chromosome. Additionally, sequence data from four loci from field-collected mosquitoes from several West African countries show very strong differentiation between the molecular forms in division 5D/6, whereas none was observed in two loci elsewhere on the X chromosome. Furthermore, genetic variation was substantially lower in division 5D/6 compared to the two reference loci, and the inferred genealogies of the division 5D/6 genes show patterns consistent with selective sweeps. This suggests that the reduced recombination rate has increased the effect of selection on this region and that our data are consistent with the hypothesis that reduced recombination rates can play a role in the accumulation of isolation genes in the face of gene flow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17057242      PMCID: PMC1698612          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.059949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  57 in total

1.  A test of the chromosomal rearrangement model of speciation in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Kirsten M Brown; Lisa M Burk; Loren M Henagan; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Gene flow among populations of the malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae, in Mali, West Africa.

Authors:  C Taylor; Y T Touré; J Carnahan; D E Norris; G Dolo; S F Traoré; F E Edillo; G C Lanzaro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Molecular population genetics of the distal portion of the X chromosome in Drosophila: evidence for genetic hitchhiking of the yellow-achaete region.

Authors:  D J Begun; C F Aquadro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  When genetic distance matters: measuring genetic differentiation at microsatellite loci in whole-genome scans of recent and incipient mosquito species.

Authors:  R Wang; L Zheng; Y T Touré; T Dandekar; F C Kafatos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Lack of polymorphism on the Drosophila fourth chromosome resulting from selection.

Authors:  A J Berry; J W Ajioka; M Kreitman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Hybrid zones and the genetic architecture of a barrier to gene flow between two sunflower species.

Authors:  L H Rieseberg; J Whitton; K Gardner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Root probabilities for intraspecific gene trees under neutral coalescent theory.

Authors:  J Castelloe; A R Templeton
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.286

8.  Simultaneous identification of species and molecular forms of the Anopheles gambiae complex by PCR-RFLP.

Authors:  C Fanello; F Santolamazza; A della Torre
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.739

9.  African and North American populations of Drosophila melanogaster are very different at the DNA level.

Authors:  D J Begun; C F Aquadro
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-10-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Chromosomal differentiation and adaptation to human environments in the Anopheles gambiae complex.

Authors:  M Coluzzi; A Sabatini; V Petrarca; M A Di Deco
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.184

View more
  23 in total

1.  Gene flow-dependent genomic divergence between Anopheles gambiae M and S forms.

Authors:  David Weetman; Craig S Wilding; Keith Steen; João Pinto; Martin J Donnelly
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of gene flow and hybrid fitness between the M and S forms of the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Yoosook Lee; Clare D Marsden; Laura C Norris; Travis C Collier; Bradley J Main; Abdrahamane Fofana; Anthony J Cornel; Gregory C Lanzaro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Genetic association of physically unlinked islands of genomic divergence in incipient species of Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Bradley J White; Changde Cheng; Frederic Simard; Carlo Costantini; Nora J Besansky
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Single-nucleotide polymorphisms for high-throughput genotyping of Anopheles arabiensis in East and southern Africa.

Authors:  Yoosook Lee; Stephanie N Seifert; Christen M Fornadel; Douglas E Norris; Gregory C Lanzaro
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.278

5.  A test of the chromosomal theory of ecotypic speciation in Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Nicholas C Manoukis; Jeffrey R Powell; Mahamoudou B Touré; Adama Sacko; Frances E Edillo; Mamadou B Coulibaly; Sekou F Traoré; Charles E Taylor; Nora J Besansky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Genetic isolation within the malaria mosquito Anopheles melas.

Authors:  Kevin C Deitz; Giri Athrey; Michael R Reddy; Hans J Overgaard; Abrahan Matias; Musa Jawara; Alessandra Della Torre; Vincenzo Petrarca; João Pinto; Anthony E Kiszewski; Pierre Kengne; Carlo Costantini; Adalgisa Caccone; Michel A Slotman
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 7.  Islands of speciation or mirages in the desert? Examining the role of restricted recombination in maintaining species.

Authors:  M A F Noor; S M Bennett
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Recombination and speciation: loci near centromeres are more differentiated than loci near telomeres between subspecies of the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus).

Authors:  Miguel Carneiro; Nuno Ferrand; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Physiological correlates of ecological divergence along an urbanization gradient: differential tolerance to ammonia among molecular forms of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Billy Tene Fossog; Christophe Antonio-Nkondjio; Pierre Kengne; Flobert Njiokou; Nora J Besansky; Carlo Costantini
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.964

10.  Chromosome inversions, genomic differentiation and speciation in the African malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Yoosook Lee; Travis C Collier; Michelle R Sanford; Clare D Marsden; Abdrahamane Fofana; Anthony J Cornel; Gregory C Lanzaro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.