Literature DB >> 10675739

Systematics of malaria vectors with particular reference to the Anopheles punctulatus group.

N W Beebe1, R D Cooper.   

Abstract

The appearance of groups and complexes of closely related cryptic or sibling species in many of the anopheline taxa has impeded studies on malaria transmission and the evaluation of control strategies which have relied on morphological characters to identify the vector species involved. The advantages of morphological identification are low cost, speed and simplicity, which allow large numbers of specimens to be processed rapidly in the field. The need for accurate identification is crucial, as time and money may be wasted in studying and controlling species of no medical importance. Various techniques such as cross-mating, chromosome studies and allozyme analysis have been developed to resolve problems of identifying sibling species, though none, as yet, can match the speed and simplicity afforded by morphology markers. The latest of these identification methods comes from advances that have been made in DNA-based technology. Although costly and requiring fairly sophisticated laboratory support, methods such as DNA probe hybridisation and PCR are the quickest and most user-friendly to date. The use of DNA has other advantages in the study of intraspecific differences and in providing characters for phylogenetic studies. This review looks at the development of DNA-based techniques for taxonomic and systematic studies of anopheline mosquitoes. The Anopheles punctulatus group of the southwest Pacific is featured as an example of how this technology has been applied and how it has progressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10675739     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7519(99)00171-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Parasitol        ISSN: 0020-7519            Impact factor:   3.981


  6 in total

1.  The ITS2 ribosomal DNA of Anopheles beklemishevi and further remarks on the phylogenetic relationships within the Anopheles maculipennis group of species (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  Helge Kampen
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Intraspecific variation in odor-mediated host preference of the mosquito Culex annulirostris.

Authors:  Craig R Williams; Michael J Kokkinn; Benjamin P Smith
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Incomplete concerted evolution and reproductive isolation at the rDNA locus uncovers nine cryptic species within Anopheles longirostris from Papua New Guinea.

Authors:  David E Alquezar; Stephane Hemmerter; Robert D Cooper; Nigel W Beebe
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Multiplex PCR Assay for the Identification of Four Species of the Anopheles Leucosphyrus Sub-Group in Malaysia.

Authors:  Sandthya Pramasivan; Jonathan Wee Kent Liew; Nantha Kumar Jeyaprakasam; Van Lun Low; Romano Ngui; Indra Vythilingam
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 2.769

5.  Behaviour and molecular identification of Anopheles malaria vectors in Jayapura district, Papua province, Indonesia.

Authors:  Brandy St Laurent; Sukowati Supratman; Puji Budi Setia Asih; David Bretz; John Mueller; Helen Catherine Miller; Amirullah Baharuddin; Asik Surya; Michelle Ngai; Ferdinand Laihad; Din Syafruddin; William A Hawley; Frank H Collins; Neil F Lobo
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 2.979

6.  Molecular Analysis Reveals a High Diversity of Anopheline Mosquitoes in Yanomami Lands and the Pantanal Region of Brazil.

Authors:  Teresa Fernandes Silva-do-Nascimento; Jordi Sánchez-Ribas; Tatiane M P Oliveira; Brian Patrick Bourke; Joseli Oliveira-Ferreira; Maria Goreti Rosa-Freitas; Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira; Mariana Marinho-E-Silva; Maycon Sebastião Alberto Santos Neves; Jan E Conn; Maria Anice Mureb Sallum
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 4.096

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.