PURPOSE: To determine the tracking factor by studying the relationship between kidney and diaphragm motions and to compare the efficiency of the gating-and-following and gating-only algorithms in reducing motion artifacts in navigator-gated scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Diaphragm and kidney motions were measured by using real-time TrueFISP sequences from 10 healthy human volunteers to determine tracking factors at different acceptance windows. Mean tracking factors were used to calculate mean residual errors and improvement factors for the gating-and-following and gating-only algorithms. RESULTS: Mean tracking factors for ± 4, ± 6, ± 8 mm and full acceptance windows ranged from 0.6 to 0.7, with large interindividual variations. Acceptance rates increased as the size of the acceptance window increased (acceptance rate for a 4 mm window ∼50%). There was a greater reduction of motion errors by gating-and-following (maximum of 1.86 mm) than gating-only (maximum of 7.05 mm). CONCLUSION: Mean tracking factors obtained in this study can be used as a guideline for using the gating-and-following algorithm in navigator-gated kidney scans. The gating-and-following and gating-only algorithms were quantitatively compared, and it was found that the former is more effective in reducing motion errors.
PURPOSE: To determine the tracking factor by studying the relationship between kidney and diaphragm motions and to compare the efficiency of the gating-and-following and gating-only algorithms in reducing motion artifacts in navigator-gated scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Diaphragm and kidney motions were measured by using real-time TrueFISP sequences from 10 healthy human volunteers to determine tracking factors at different acceptance windows. Mean tracking factors were used to calculate mean residual errors and improvement factors for the gating-and-following and gating-only algorithms. RESULTS: Mean tracking factors for ± 4, ± 6, ± 8 mm and full acceptance windows ranged from 0.6 to 0.7, with large interindividual variations. Acceptance rates increased as the size of the acceptance window increased (acceptance rate for a 4 mm window ∼50%). There was a greater reduction of motion errors by gating-and-following (maximum of 1.86 mm) than gating-only (maximum of 7.05 mm). CONCLUSION: Mean tracking factors obtained in this study can be used as a guideline for using the gating-and-following algorithm in navigator-gated kidney scans. The gating-and-following and gating-only algorithms were quantitatively compared, and it was found that the former is more effective in reducing motion errors.
Authors: Richard W Katzberg; Michael H Buonocore; Roger Low; Brian Hu; Kiran Jain; Michele Castillo; Scott Troxel; Mike M Nguyen Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging Date: 2009 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Suzanne R Harrogate; L M Shirley Yick; James C Williams; Robin O Cleveland; Benjamin W Turney Journal: J Endourol Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Hao Song; Dan Ruan; Wenyang Liu; V Andrew Stenger; Rolf Pohmann; Maria A Fernández-Seara; Tejas Nair; Sungkyu Jung; Jingqin Luo; Yuichi Motai; Jingfei Ma; John D Hazle; H Michael Gach Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Jasper N Smit; Koert F D Kuhlmann; Oleksandra V Ivashchenko; Bart R Thomson; Thomas Langø; Niels F M Kok; Matteo Fusaglia; Theo J M Ruers Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2022-05-27 Impact factor: 3.421
Authors: Jinsoo Uh; Matthew J Krasin; Yimei Li; Xingyu Li; Christopher Tinkle; John T Lucas; Thomas E Merchant; Chiaho Hua Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 8.013
Authors: Fabio Nery; Charlotte E Buchanan; Anita A Harteveld; Aghogho Odudu; Octavia Bane; Eleanor F Cox; Katja Derlin; H Michael Gach; Xavier Golay; Marcel Gutberlet; Christoffer Laustsen; Alexandra Ljimani; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Ivan Pedrosa; Pottumarthi V Prasad; Philip M Robson; Kanishka Sharma; Steven Sourbron; Manuel Taso; David L Thomas; Danny J J Wang; Jeff L Zhang; David C Alsop; Sean B Fain; Susan T Francis; María A Fernández-Seara Journal: MAGMA Date: 2019-12-12 Impact factor: 2.533