Literature DB >> 7938682

Kidney mobility during respiration.

L H Schwartz1, J Richaud, L Buffat, E Touboul, M Schlienger.   

Abstract

Radiotherapy treatment planning needs optimum definition of the target volume in its relative position to normal tissue. The motion of the kidneys during respiration has not been well quantified. They move in a tilted coronal and sagittal plane. Using fast MRI while patients held their breath we quantified the movements of the kidneys. Fourteen patients volunteered for the study. Nine MRI images of the kidneys for one volunteer were done: three in the axial plane (all in deep inspiration) and six in the coronal plane (three in deep inspiration, three in deep expiration). The maximal vertical motion of the superior pole from its end-expiratory to its end-inspiratory position is 39 mm (43 mm for the inferior pole). In deep inspiration or deep expiration the positions of the right and left kidneys appear reproducible. The mean deviation of kidney movement is less than 4 mm in all three dimensions (range, 0-6.9). For tumors close to the kidney, we advocate respiration gated radiation therapy so as to minimize the movement of this very radiosensitive structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7938682     DOI: 10.1016/0167-8140(94)90452-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of respiratory liver and kidney movements for MRI navigator gating.

Authors:  Ruitian Song; Aaryani Tipirneni; Perry Johnson; Ralf B Loeffler; Claudia M Hillenbrand
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  CT mapping of the vertebral level of right adrenal vein.

Authors:  Christoph Degenhart; Hanna Strube; Matthias J Betz; Anna Pallauf; Martin Bidlingmaier; Evelyn Fischer; Martin Reincke; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan Wirth
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

3.  Enabling free-breathing background suppressed renal pCASL using fat imaging and retrospective motion correction.

Authors:  Isabell K Bones; Anita A Harteveld; Suzanne L Franklin; Matthias J P van Osch; Jeroen Hendrikse; Chrit T W Moonen; Clemens Bos; Marijn van Stralen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Quantification of the Range of Motion of Kidney and Ureteral Stones During Shockwave Lithotripsy in Conscious Patients.

Authors:  Suzanne R Harrogate; L M Shirley Yick; James C Williams; Robin O Cleveland; Benjamin W Turney
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Quantitative assessment of shockwave lithotripsy accuracy and the effect of respiratory motion.

Authors:  Mathew D Sorensen; Michael R Bailey; Anup R Shah; Ryan S Hsi; Marla Paun; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Optimization of b-value sampling for diffusion-weighted imaging of the kidney.

Authors:  Jeff L Zhang; Eric E Sigmund; Henry Rusinek; Hersh Chandarana; Pippa Storey; Qun Chen; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Reappraisal of the classical abdominal anatomical landmarks using in vivo computerized tomography imaging.

Authors:  Ruchi Goyal; Anjali Aggarwal; Tulika Gupta; Ajay Gulati; Shallu Jaggi; S Ali Mirjalili; Daisy Sahni
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 8.  Optimisation of shock wave lithotripsy: a systematic review of technical aspects to improve outcomes.

Authors:  Su-Min Lee; Neil Collin; Helen Wiseman; Joe Philip
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-09

9.  Novel assessment of renal motion in children as measured via four-dimensional computed tomography.

Authors:  Atmaram S Pai Panandiker; Shelly Sharma; Mihir H Naik; Shengjie Wu; Chiaho Hua; Chris Beltran; Matthew J Krasin; Thomas E Merchant
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  In vivo analysis of cadmium in battery workers versus measurements of blood, urine, and workplace air.

Authors:  J Börjesson; T Bellander; L Järup; C G Elinder; S Mattsson
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.