Literature DB >> 26756226

Quantification of the Range of Motion of Kidney and Ureteral Stones During Shockwave Lithotripsy in Conscious Patients.

Suzanne R Harrogate1, L M Shirley Yick1, James C Williams2, Robin O Cleveland3, Benjamin W Turney4.   

Abstract

Effective shockwave lithotripsy requires accurate targeting of the stone throughout the course of treatment. Stone movement secondary to respiratory movement can make this more difficult. In vitro work has shown that stone motion outside the focal region reduces the efficacy of stone fragmentation; however, there are few clinical data on the degree of stone movement in patients during treatment. To investigate this, X-ray fluoroscopic images of the kidney and ureteral stones at the upper and lower limits of the normal respiratory cycle were acquired during shock wave lithotripsy of 58 conscious patients, and stone excursion was calculated from these images. In addition, the respiration rate and patient perceived pain were recorded during the course of the treatment. It was found that stone motion secondary to respiration was 7.7 ± 2.9 mm for kidney stones and 3.6 ± 2.1 mm for ureteral stones-less than has been reported in studies with anesthetized patients. There was no significant change of motion over the course of treatment although pain was found to increase. These data suggest that stone motion in conscious patients is less than in anesthetized patients. Furthermore, it suggests that lithotripters with focal regions of 8 mm or greater should not suffer from a marked drop in fragmentation efficiency due to stone motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26756226      PMCID: PMC4840995          DOI: 10.1089/end.2015.0388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  12 in total

1.  Evaluation of respiratory liver and kidney movements for MRI navigator gating.

Authors:  Ruitian Song; Aaryani Tipirneni; Perry Johnson; Ralf B Loeffler; Claudia M Hillenbrand
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Effect of stone motion on in vitro comminution efficiency of Storz Modulith SLX.

Authors:  Robin O Cleveland; Ronald Anglade; Richard K Babayan
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Trends in urological stone disease.

Authors:  Benjamin W Turney; John M Reynard; Jeremy G Noble; Stephen R Keoghane
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Quantitative assessment of shockwave lithotripsy accuracy and the effect of respiratory motion.

Authors:  Mathew D Sorensen; Michael R Bailey; Anup R Shah; Ryan S Hsi; Marla Paun; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of renal pelvis stones with PCK stonelith lithotripter.

Authors:  Abdurrahman Ozgür; N Yalm Iker
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Kidney mobility during respiration.

Authors:  L H Schwartz; J Richaud; L Buffat; E Touboul; M Schlienger
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Shockwave lithotripsy: dose-related effects on renal structure, hemodynamics, and tubular function.

Authors:  Lynn R Willis; Andrew P Evan; Bret A Connors; Youzhi Shao; Philip M Blomgren; J Howard Pratt; Naomi S Fineberg; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Audiovisual distraction reduces pain perception during shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Emma Marsdin; Jeremy G Noble; John M Reynard; Benjamin W Turney
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  A method for incorporating organ motion due to breathing into 3D dose calculations in the liver: sensitivity to variations in motion.

Authors:  Anthony E Lujan; James M Balter; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 10.  Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; Ehud Gnessin; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 14.432

View more
  2 in total

1.  Can intervals in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy sessions affect success in the treatment of upper ureteral stones?

Authors:  Turgay Turan; Ozgur Efioglu; Yavuz Onur Danacioglu; Furkan Sendogan; Meftun Culpan; Bilal Gunaydin; Ramazan Gokhan Atis; Turhan Caskurlu; Asif Yildirim
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 1.195

Review 2.  Indications and contraindications for shock wave lithotripsy and how to improve outcomes.

Authors:  Luke F Reynolds; Tad Kroczak; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2018-09-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.