Literature DB >> 21168538

Effects of age and sex on the strength and cortical thickness of the femoral neck.

R D Carpenter1, S Sigurdsson, S Zhao, Y Lu, G Eiriksdottir, G Sigurdsson, B Y Jonsson, S Prevrhal, T B Harris, K Siggeirsdottir, V Guðnason, T F Lang.   

Abstract

A group of 48 men (22 aged 65-75 years, 26 aged 80-90 years) and 59 women (32 aged 65-75 years, 27 aged 80-90 years) were enrolled in the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik study and imaged with in vivo volumetric Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) to investigate the effects of age and sex on femoral neck structure and strength. Femoral neck cross-sectional moment of inertia for bending directions near those of standing and walking (I(AP)), bending strength (M(y)), and axial compressive strength (F(y)) were computed at the location of minimum cross-sectional area (minCSA). Local cortical thickness was computed in the inferior femoral neck based on density profiles extending through the cortex of the minCSA femoral neck section. Multivariate models accounting for height, weight, and age group (younger or older) showed that men had a 46% higher M(y) and a 23% higher F(y) than women, while women had a 13% thicker inferior cortex than men. Cortical thickness in the inferoposterior region of the femoral neck was significantly related to bending and axial strength after adjusting for overall volumetric bone mineral density. Both minCSA and I(AP) were higher in the older, gender-pooled age group, but F(y) and M(y) did not differ between the two age groups. The results suggest that age-related expansion of the femoral neck primarily occurs in the superior and inferior directions and helps maintain homeostasis of femoral neck stiffness and strength. The higher bending strength of the male femoral neck may partly explain why elderly men have a lower risk of hip fracture than elderly women.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21168538      PMCID: PMC3075958          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  31 in total

1.  Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site.

Authors:  E F Morgan; T M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Shape, structural properties, and cortical stability along the femoral neck: a study using clinical QCT.

Authors:  Lang Yang; Ivana Maric; Eugene V McCloskey; Richard Eastell
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 2.617

3.  Changing structure of the femoral neck across the adult female lifespan.

Authors:  Kenneth E S Poole; Paul M Mayhew; Collette M Rose; J Keenan Brown; Philip J Bearcroft; Nigel Loveridge; Jonathan Reeve
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities.

Authors:  G Bergmann; G Deuretzbacher; M Heller; F Graichen; A Rohlmann; J Strauss; G N Duda
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures have different risk factors: a prospective study.

Authors:  K M Fox; S R Cummings; E Williams; K Stone
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Structural adaptation to changing skeletal load in the progression toward hip fragility: the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  T J Beck; T L Oreskovic; K L Stone; C B Ruff; K Ensrud; M C Nevitt; H K Genant; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Does body size account for gender differences in femur bone density and geometry?

Authors:  A C Looker; T J Beck; E S Orwoll
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Stress fracture in military recruits: gender differences in muscle and bone susceptibility factors.

Authors:  T J Beck; C B Ruff; R A Shaffer; K Betsinger; D W Trone; S K Brodine
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Hip structural geometry in old and old-old age: similarities and differences between men and women.

Authors:  Laurel B Yates; David Karasik; Thomas J Beck; L Adrienne Cupples; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  High resolution cortical bone thickness measurement from clinical CT data.

Authors:  G M Treece; A H Gee; P M Mayhew; K E S Poole
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 8.545

View more
  17 in total

1.  Automatic multi-parametric quantification of the proximal femur with quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Serena Bonaretti; Isra Saeed; Roy Harnish; Robert Recker; Andrew J Burghardt; Joyce H Keyak; Tamara Harris; Sundeep Khosla; Thomas F Lang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-08

2.  Sex-related variations in cortical and trabecular bone of the femoral neck in an elderly Chinese population.

Authors:  L Wang; X G Cheng; Y B Su; K Brown; L Xu; K Li; C X Zhang; Y Zhang; Y Y Duanmu; X B Wu; M Y Wang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  New advances in imaging osteoporosis and its complications.

Authors:  James F Griffith; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Bone disease in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: results from a screened population-based study.

Authors:  Sigrun Thorsteinsdottir; Sigrun H Lund; Ebba K Lindqvist; Marianna Thordardottir; Gunnar Sigurdsson; Rene Costello; Debra Burton; Hlif Steingrimsdottir; Vilmundur Gudnason; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Kristin Siggeirsdottir; Tamara B Harris; Ola Landgren; Sigurdur Y Kristinsson
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2017-12-21

5.  The relationship between whole bone stiffness and strength is age and sex dependent.

Authors:  Daniella M Patton; Erin M R Bigelow; Stephen H Schlecht; David H Kohn; Todd L Bredbenner; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Assessing bone quality in terms of bone mineral density, buckling ratio and critical fracture load.

Authors:  D Anitha; Taeyong Lee
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2014-11-30

7.  Implications of local osteoporosis on the efficacy of anti-resorptive drug treatment: a 3-year follow-up finite element study in risedronate-treated women.

Authors:  D Anitha; K J Kim; S-K Lim; T Lee
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Proximal femoral density distribution and structure in relation to age and hip fracture risk in women.

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Roy Harnish; Isra Saeed; Timothy Streeper; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Shreyasee Amin; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Terry M Therneau; Kristin Siggeirsdottir; Xiaoguang Cheng; L Joseph Melton; Joyce Keyak; Vilmundur Gudnason; Sundeep Khosla; Tamara B Harris; Thomas F Lang
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  QCT of the proximal femur--which parameters should be measured to discriminate hip fracture?

Authors:  O Museyko; V Bousson; J Adams; J -D Laredo; K Engelke
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Inter-scanner differences in in vivo QCT measurements of the density and strength of the proximal femur remain after correction with anthropomorphic standardization phantoms.

Authors:  R Dana Carpenter; Isra Saeed; Serena Bonaretti; Carole Schreck; Joyce H Keyak; Timothy Streeper; Tamara B Harris; Thomas F Lang
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 2.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.