Literature DB >> 21161537

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy does not impact the treatment success of high-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Yutaka Fujisue1, Haruhito Azuma, Teruo Inamoto, Kazumasa Komura, Piyush K Agarwal, Hiroshi Masuda, Toshikazu Watsuji, Yoji Katsuoaka.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the potential efficacy of the effects of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.
METHODS: One hundred seventy patients with localized prostate cancer underwent HIFU of the prostate, of which 114 patients, who met the study criteria, were included in the current study. The primary outcome was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) changes, and the secondary outcome was morbidity. Biochemical failure was defined according to the Phoenix criteria (prostate-specific antigen nadir +2 ng/ml).
RESULTS: The median follow-up period for all patients was 45.0 months (range: 12-70). All patients underwent PSA evaluation, and 52 (56.5%) had a 2-month PSA nadir recorded at the follow-up visit. PSA nadir was achieved by 3 months in 84.2% of treatments. The mean PSA nadir was 0.28 ng/ml. The 114 patients consisted of two groups: 44 patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (group 1), and 70 patients treated without neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (group 2). The mean PSA nadir achieved in group 1 was 0.19 ng/ml versus 0.34 ng/ml in group 2 (n.s.). The occurrence rates of treatment-related toxicities were similar in both groups.
CONCLUSION: In patients with localized prostate cancer, HIFU therapy resulted in comparable immediate cancer control. The present results indicate that combined treatment using hormonal therapy and HIFU does not have a synergistic effect on the PSA nadir.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21161537     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-010-0628-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  18 in total

1.  Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference.

Authors:  Mack Roach; Gerald Hanks; Howard Thames; Paul Schellhammer; William U Shipley; Gerald H Sokol; Howard Sandler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Immediate hormonal therapy compared with observation after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with node-positive prostate cancer.

Authors:  E M Messing; J Manola; M Sarosdy; G Wilding; E D Crawford; D Trump
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Control of prostate cancer by transrectal HIFU in 227 patients.

Authors:  Laura Poissonnier; Jean-Yves Chapelon; Olivier Rouvière; Laura Curiel; Raymonde Bouvier; Xavier Martin; Jean Michel Dubernard; Albert Gelet
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Morbidity associated with repeated transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Blana; Sebastian Rogenhofer; Roman Ganzer; Peter J Wild; Wolf F Wieland; Bernhard Walter
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Prostate cancer practice patterns and quality of life: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study.

Authors:  A L Potosky; L C Harlan; J L Stanford; F D Gilliland; A S Hamilton; P C Albertsen; J W Eley; J M Liff; D Deapen; R A Stephenson; J Legler; C E Ferrans; J A Talcott; M S Litwin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  First analysis of the long-term results with transrectal HIFU in patients with localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Blana; François J Murat; Bernhard Walter; Stefan Thuroff; Wolf F Wieland; Christian Chaussy; Albert Gelet
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Three-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy: a 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  G Aus; P-A Abrahamsson; G Ahlgren; J Hugosson; S Lundberg; M Schain; S Schelin; K Pedersen
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  PSA nadir is a significant predictor of treatment failure after high-intensity focussed ultrasound (HIFU) treatment of localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  Roman Ganzer; Sebastian Rogenhofer; Bernhard Walter; Jens-Claudio Lunz; Martin Schostak; Wolf F Wieland; Andreas Blana
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 9.  Androgen deprivation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: consider both benefits and risks.

Authors:  Hendrik Isbarn; Laurent Boccon-Gibod; Peter R Carroll; Francesco Montorsi; Claude Schulman; Matthew R Smith; Cora N Sternberg; Urs E Studer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  High-intensity-focused ultrasound in the treatment of primary prostate cancer: the first UK series.

Authors:  H U Ahmed; E Zacharakis; T Dudderidge; J N Armitage; R Scott; J Calleary; R Illing; A Kirkham; A Freeman; C Ogden; C Allen; M Emberton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.