Literature DB >> 16857310

Control of prostate cancer by transrectal HIFU in 227 patients.

Laura Poissonnier1, Jean-Yves Chapelon, Olivier Rouvière, Laura Curiel, Raymonde Bouvier, Xavier Martin, Jean Michel Dubernard, Albert Gelet.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment of localized prostate cancer with reference to disease-related prognostic factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with T1-2 localized prostate cancers, prostate specific antigen (PSA) <or=15 ng/ml, Gleason score <or=7, prostate volume <or=40 cc and no previous radical treatment for prostate cancer were treated with the Ablatherm HIFU device. Follow-up included PSA measurements, and prostate biopsies 3 months after HIFU and in cases of rising PSA. Failure was defined as any positive biopsy or a PSA >1 ng/ml with three consecutive rises.
RESULTS: The study included 227 patients. Mean follow-up was 27+/-20 months (12-121 months). Eighty-six percent had negative control biopsies. Median nadir PSA was 0.10 ng/ml. The actuarial 5-year disease-free survival rate (DFSR), combining pathologic and biochemical outcomes, was 66%. DFSR showed a significant decrease when stratified according to initial PSA level: 90% with PSA <or=4 ng/ml versus 57% and 61% with PSA between 4.1 and 10, and between 10.1 and 15 ng/ml, respectively. Incontinence and bladder neck stricture decreased with the treatment procedure standardization from 28% and 31% to 9% and 6%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: HIFU for localized prostate cancer offered high control of local disease with low morbidity. The ability to repeat the HIFU treatment is of major interest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16857310     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  72 in total

1.  HIFU ablation is not a proven standard treatment for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alan I So
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Prostate cancer: Defining biochemical failure in patients treated with HIFU.

Authors:  May Abdel-Wahab; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Focal therapy: a new paradigm for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Basir Tareen; Guilherme Godoy; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2009

Review 4.  Bubbles with shock waves and ultrasound: a review.

Authors:  Siew-Wan Ohl; Evert Klaseboer; Boo Cheong Khoo
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 5.  Novel techniques for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: evidence of efficacy?

Authors:  Marnie R Robinson; Judd W Moul
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Photodynamic therapy for prostate cancer--a review of current status and future promise.

Authors:  Caroline M Moore; Doug Pendse; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2009-01

Review 7.  MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery.

Authors:  Ferenc A Jolesz
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.739

8.  There is no role for focal therapy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Peter Black
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  MR imaging-guided interventions in the genitourinary tract: an evolving concept.

Authors:  Fiona M Fennessy; Kemal Tuncali; Paul R Morrison; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.266

10.  Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill imaging of prostate cancer: quantitative T2 values for cancer discrimination.

Authors:  Joseph R Roebuck; Steven J Haker; Dimitris Mitsouras; Frank J Rybicki; Clare M Tempany; Robert V Mulkern
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 2.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.