CONTEXT: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is increasingly used for the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa), even in clinical settings in which there is no evidence-based proof of prolonged overall survival (OS). ADT, however, may be associated with numerous side effects, including an increased therapy-related cardiovascular mortality. OBJECTIVE: To discuss different clinical settings in which ADT is currently used and to critically weigh the benefits of ADT against its possible side effects. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify original articles and review articles addressing the efficacy and side effects of ADT for the treatment of PCa. Keywords consisted of prostate cancer, hormonal therapy, adverse effects, radical prostatectomy, and radiotherapy. The articles with the highest level of evidence for the various examined end points were identified with the consensus of all authors and were reviewed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Even short-term use of ADT may lead to numerous side effects, such as osteoporosis, obesity, sarcopenia, lipid alterations, insulin resistance, and increased risk for diabetes and cardiovascular morbidity. Despite these side effects, ADT is commonly used in various clinical settings in which a clear effect on improved OS has not been shown. CONCLUSIONS: ADT is associated with an increased risk of multiple side effects that may reduce quality of life and/or OS. Consequently, these issues should be discussed in detail with patients and their families before initiation of ADT. ADT should be used with knowledge of its potential long-term side effects and with possible lifestyle interventions, especially in settings with the highest risk-benefit ratio, to alleviate comorbidities.
CONTEXT: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is increasingly used for the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa), even in clinical settings in which there is no evidence-based proof of prolonged overall survival (OS). ADT, however, may be associated with numerous side effects, including an increased therapy-related cardiovascular mortality. OBJECTIVE: To discuss different clinical settings in which ADT is currently used and to critically weigh the benefits of ADT against its possible side effects. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify original articles and review articles addressing the efficacy and side effects of ADT for the treatment of PCa. Keywords consisted of prostate cancer, hormonal therapy, adverse effects, radical prostatectomy, and radiotherapy. The articles with the highest level of evidence for the various examined end points were identified with the consensus of all authors and were reviewed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Even short-term use of ADT may lead to numerous side effects, such as osteoporosis, obesity, sarcopenia, lipid alterations, insulin resistance, and increased risk for diabetes and cardiovascular morbidity. Despite these side effects, ADT is commonly used in various clinical settings in which a clear effect on improved OS has not been shown. CONCLUSIONS:ADT is associated with an increased risk of multiple side effects that may reduce quality of life and/or OS. Consequently, these issues should be discussed in detail with patients and their families before initiation of ADT. ADT should be used with knowledge of its potential long-term side effects and with possible lifestyle interventions, especially in settings with the highest risk-benefit ratio, to alleviate comorbidities.
Authors: Anthony V D'Amico; Judith Manola; Marian Loffredo; Andrew A Renshaw; Alyssa DellaCroce; Philip W Kantoff Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-08-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: David E Laaksonen; Leo Niskanen; Kari Punnonen; Kristiina Nyyssönen; Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen; Veli-Pekka Valkonen; Riitta Salonen; Jukka T Salonen Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Razvan M Galalae; Alvaro Martinez; Tim Mate; Christina Mitchell; Gregory Edmundson; Nils Nuernberg; Stephen Eulau; Gary Gustafson; Michael Gribble; Gyoergy Kovács Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-03-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Matthew R Smith; James Eastham; Donald M Gleason; Daniel Shasha; Simon Tchekmedyian; Norman Zinner Journal: J Urol Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Matthew R Cooperberg; Jeanette M Broering; Mark S Litwin; Deborah P Lubeck; Shilpa S Mehta; James M Henning; Peter R Carroll Journal: J Urol Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Osvaldo P Almeida; Anna Waterreus; Nigel Spry; Leon Flicker; Ralph N Martins Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Matthew R Smith; S Bruce Malkowicz; Michael K Brawer; Michael L Hancock; Ronald A Morton; Mitchell S Steiner Journal: J Urol Date: 2011-10-19 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Tony Soeyonggo; Jennifer Locke; Maria Elizabeth Del Giudice; Shabbir Alibhai; Neil Eric Fleshner; Padraig Warde Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Kagan Griffin; Ilona Csizmadi; Lauren E Howard; Gina-Maria Pomann; William J Aronson; Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; Matthew R Cooperberg; Martha K Terris; Jennifer Beebe-Dimmer; Stephen J Freedland Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 2.506