Literature DB >> 16798415

Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference.

Mack Roach1, Gerald Hanks, Howard Thames, Paul Schellhammer, William U Shipley, Gerald H Sokol, Howard Sandler.   

Abstract

In 1996 the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) sponsored a Consensus Conference to establish a definition of biochemical failure after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). The ASTRO definition defined prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure as occurring after three consecutive PSA rises after a nadir with the date of failure as the point halfway between the nadir date and the first rise or any rise great enough to provoke initiation of therapy. This definition was not linked to clinical progression or survival; it performed poorly in patients undergoing hormonal therapy (HT), and backdating biased the Kaplan-Meier estimates of event-free survival. A second Consensus Conference was sponsored by ASTRO and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group in Phoenix, Arizona, on January 21, 2005, to revise the ASTRO definition. The panel recommended: (1) a rise by 2 ng/mL or more above the nadir PSA be considered the standard definition for biochemical failure after EBRT with or without HT; (2) the date of failure be determined "at call" (not backdated). They recommended that investigators be allowed to use the ASTRO Consensus Definition after EBRT alone (no hormonal therapy) with strict adherence to guidelines as to "adequate follow-up." To avoid the artifacts resulting from short follow-up, the reported date of control should be listed as 2 years short of the median follow-up. For example, if the median follow-up is 5 years, control rates at 3 years should be cited. Retaining a strict version of the ASTRO definition would allow comparisons with a large existing body of literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16798415     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.04.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  689 in total

1.  Head to head comparison performance of 99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-iPSMA SPECT/CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT a prospective study in biochemical recurrence prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Francisco Osvaldo García-Pérez; Jenny Davanzo; Sergio López-Buenrostro; Clara Santos-Cuevas; Guillermina Ferro-Flores; Miguel A Jímenez-Ríos; Anna Scavuzzo; Zael Santana-Ríos; Sevastián Medina-Ornelas
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-10-20

2.  HIFU ablation is not a proven standard treatment for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alan I So
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Comparison of seed brachytherapy or external beam radiotherapy (70 Gy or 74 Gy) in 919 low-risk prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  G Goldner; R Pötter; J J Battermann; M P Schmid; C Kirisits; S Sljivic; M van Vulpen
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 4.  Current status of salvage robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for radiorecurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bernardo Rocco; Gabriele Cozzi; Matteo Giulio Spinelli; Angelica Grasso; Daniela Varisco; Rafael F Coelho; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Treatment of localised prostate cancer with radiation therapy: evidence versus opinion.

Authors:  Ferran Guedea; Alfredo Ramos; Ismael Herruzo; José Antonio Sánchez Calzado; Jorge Contreras; Jesús Romero; Jordi Craven-Bartle; Patricia Willisch; José Luis López Torrecilla; Xavier Maldonado; Gemma Sancho; Almudena Zapatero; Montserrat Ferrer; Yolanda Pardo; Pablo Fernández; Alfonso Mariño; Asunción Hervás; Víctor Macís; Ana Boladeras; Ferran Ferrer; Brian J Davis
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Prostate cancer: Defining biochemical failure in patients treated with HIFU.

Authors:  May Abdel-Wahab; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  External validation of the ProCaRS nomograms and comparison of existing risk-stratification tools for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  David Tiberi; George Rodrigues; Tom Pickles; Jim Morris; Juanita Crook; Andre-Guy Martin; Fabio Cury; Charles Catton; Himu Lukka; Andrew Warner; Daniel Taussky
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Biologically effective dose and definitive radiation treatment for localized prostate cancer: treatment gaps do affect the risk of biochemical failure.

Authors:  P Sanpaolo; V Barbieri; D Genovesi
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Bcl-2 and Bax expression predict prostate cancer outcome in men treated with androgen deprivation and radiotherapy on radiation therapy oncology group protocol 92-02.

Authors:  Li Yan Khor; Jennifer Moughan; Tahseen Al-Saleem; Elizabeth H Hammond; Varagur Venkatesan; Seth A Rosenthal; Mark A Ritter; Howard M Sandler; Gerald E Hanks; William U Shipley; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  The Efficacy and Safety of Conventional and Hypofractionated High-Dose Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer in an Elderly Population: A Subgroup Analysis of the CHHiP Trial.

Authors:  James M Wilson; David P Dearnaley; Isabel Syndikus; Vincent Khoo; Alison Birtle; David Bloomfield; Ananya Choudhury; John Graham; Catherine Ferguson; Zafar Malik; Julian Money-Kyrle; Joe M O'Sullivan; Miguel Panades; Chris Parker; Yvonne Rimmer; Christopher Scrase; John Staffurth; Andrew Stockdale; Clare Cruickshank; Clare Griffin; Emma Hall
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.