Literature DB >> 21160666

Patient dose considerations in computed tomography examinations.

Ioannis A Tsalafoutas1, Georgios V Koukourakis.   

Abstract

Ionizing radiation is extensively used in medicine and its contribution to both diagnosis and therapy is undisputable. However, the use of ionizing radiation also involves a certain risk since it may cause damage to tissues and organs and trigger carcinogenesis. Computed tomography (CT) is currently one of the major contributors to the collective population radiation dose both because it is a relatively high dose examination and an increasing number of people are subjected to CT examinations many times during their lifetime. The evolution of CT scanner technology has greatly increased the clinical applications of CT and its availability throughout the world and made it a routine rather than a specialized examination. With the modern multislice CT scanners, fast volume scanning of the whole human body within less than 1 min is now feasible. Two dimensional images of superb quality can be reconstructed in every possible plane with respect to the patient axis (e.g. axial, sagital and coronal). Furthermore, three-dimensional images of all anatomic structures and organs can be produced with only minimal additional effort (e.g. skeleton, tracheobronchial tree, gastrointestinal system and cardiovascular system). All these applications, which are diagnostically valuable, also involve a significant radiation risk. Therefore, all medical professionals involved with CT, either as referring or examining medical doctors must be aware of the risks involved before they decide to prescribe or perform CT examinations. Ultimately, the final decision concerning justification for a prescribed CT examination lies upon the radiologist. In this paper, we summarize the basic information concerning the detrimental effects of ionizing radiation, as well as the CT dosimetry background. Furthermore, after a brief summary of the evolution of CT scanning, the current CT scanner technology and its special features with respect to patient doses are given in detail. Some numerical data is also given in order to comprehend the magnitude of the potential radiation risk involved in comparison with risk from exposure to natural background radiation levels.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Computed tomography dose index; Dose length product; Effective dose; Patient dose; Radiation risk; Skin dose

Year:  2010        PMID: 21160666      PMCID: PMC2999328          DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v2.i7.262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Radiol        ISSN: 1949-8470


  33 in total

Review 1.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  CT-guided interventional procedures without CT fluoroscopy assistance: patient effective dose and absorbed dose considerations.

Authors:  Ioannis A Tsalafoutas; Virginia Tsapaki; Charicleia Triantopoulou; Akrivi Gorantonaki; John Papailiou
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Effects of adaptive section collimation on patient radiation dose in multisection spiral CT.

Authors:  Paul D Deak; Oliver Langner; Michael Lell; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Radiation dose and image quality in spiral computed tomography: multicentre evaluation at six institutions.

Authors:  R J Scheck; E M Coppenrath; M W Kellner; K J Lehmann; C Rock; J Rieger; L Rothmeier; F Schweden; A A Bäuml; K Hahn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  CT scanner dosimetry.

Authors:  P C Shrimpton; S Edyvean
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey.

Authors:  G Brix; H D Nagel; G Stamm; R Veit; U Lechel; J Griebel; M Galanski
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography.

Authors:  T B Shope; R M Gagne; G C Johnson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Analysis of radiological examination request forms in conjunction with justification of X-ray exposures.

Authors:  Ch Triantopoulou; I Tsalafoutas; P Maniatis; D Papavdis; G Raios; I Siafas; S Velonakis; E Koulentianos
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Patient doses in multi-slice CT and the importance of optimisation.

Authors:  J C P Heggie
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.430

10.  The European Directive on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionising radiation in relation to medical exposures (97/43/EURATOM).

Authors:  D Teunen
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.394

View more
  7 in total

1.  Computed tomography-based preoperative vascular imaging in autologous breast reconstruction: A Canadian perspective.

Authors:  Caitlin Jane Symonette; Bing Siang Gan
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2013

2.  Quantitative analyses of pediatric cervical spine ossification patterns using computed tomography.

Authors:  Narayan Yoganandan; Frank A Pintar; Sean M Lew; Raj D Rao; Nagarajan Rangarajan
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2011

3.  Evaluation of common findings in brain computerized tomography (CT) scan: A single center study.

Authors:  Daniel Chimuanya Ugwuanyi; Tochukwu Florence Sibeudu; Chidmma Precious Irole; Michael Promise Ogolodom; Chukwudi Thaddeus Nwagbara; Adaobi Maryann Ibekwe; Awajimijan Nathaniel Mbaba
Journal:  AIMS Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-13

4.  Patients Radiation Risks from Computed Tomography Lymphography.

Authors:  Abdullah Almujally; Abdelmoneim Sulieman; Fabrizio Calliada
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2020-08-01

5.  Radiation dosimetry of 18F-FDG PET/CT: incorporating exam-specific parameters in dose estimates.

Authors:  Brian Quinn; Zak Dauer; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Heiko Schoder; Lawrence T Dauer
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 6.  Genetic testing for early detection of individuals at risk of coronary heart disease and monitoring response to therapy: challenges and promises.

Authors:  H Robert Superko; Robert Roberts; Arthur Agatston; Stephen Frohwein; Jason S Reingold; Thomas J White; John J Sninsky; Basil Margolis; Kathryn M Momary; Brenda C Garrett; Spencer B King
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.113

7.  Computed Tomography: Return on Investment and Regional Disparity Factor Analysis.

Authors:  Shinya Imai; Manabu Akahane; Tomoaki Imamura
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2019-01-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.