Literature DB >> 17515365

CT-guided interventional procedures without CT fluoroscopy assistance: patient effective dose and absorbed dose considerations.

Ioannis A Tsalafoutas1, Virginia Tsapaki, Charicleia Triantopoulou, Akrivi Gorantonaki, John Papailiou.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine patient effective dose (E) and peak absorbed dose to the skin of the patient from various CT-guided interventional procedures performed without CT fluoroscopy assistance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 49 interventions were retrospectively studied: 14 biopsies, 14 radiofrequency ablations, 14 abscess drainages, and seven nephrostomies. CT images were acquired from the department's PACS system and reviewed to record the scan parameters of each slice. Entrance surface dose and E were estimated using the Impactscan database and the related Monte Carlo conversion coefficients.
RESULTS: Median values of E for biopsies, radiofrequency ablations, abscess drainages, and nephrostomies were 23, 35.3, 16.2, and 11.5 mSv, respectively. Respective ranges were 5.8-46.6, 18.4-57.2, 10.9-31.5, and 5.1-32.7 mSv. The corresponding median values and ranges for the peak absorbed dose were 281, 557, 155, and 145 mGy and 133-982, 147-699, 94-315, and 75-297 mGy. The diagnostic scans obtained before the interventions were responsible for 63%, 33% 40%, and 51% of E, respectively. The largest contribution to the peak absorbed dose was due to positioning of the tissue acquisition biopsy gun in biopsies (48%), the radiofrequency needle in ablations (57%), and the catheter in abscess drainages (41%) and nephrostomies (49%).
CONCLUSION: For the CT interventions studied, and especially for biopsies and radiofrequency ablations, patient effective doses were considerably high. Maximum peak absorbed dose observed was about 1 Gy, considerably lower than the threshold for deterministic effects (2 Gy).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17515365     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.06.0705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  18 in total

1.  Transthoracic needle biopsy.

Authors:  Katherine R Birchard
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  A method for calculating the dose length product from CT DICOM images.

Authors:  I A Tsalafoutas; S I Metallidis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Xin Liu; Shuai Leng; James M Kofler; Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo; Mingliang Qu; Jodie Christner; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2009-10

4.  [Computed tomography guidance: fluoroscopy and more].

Authors:  P M Paprottka; T Helmberger; M F Reiser; C G Trumm
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Effect of Body Habitus on Radiation Dose During CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Spine Injections.

Authors:  Ronald J Viola; Giao B Nguyen; Terry T Yoshizumi; Sandra S Stinnett; Jenny K Hoang; Peter G Kranz
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 1.610

6.  CT fluoroscopy guided percutaneous gastrostomy or jejunostomy without (CT-PG/PJ) or with simultaneous endoscopy (CT-PEG/PEJ) in otherwise untreatable patients.

Authors:  Fritz W Spelsberg; Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann; Reinhold A Lang; Hauke Winter; Rolf Weidenhagen; Maximilian Reiser; Karl-Walter Jauch; Christoph Trumm
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Radiation dose reduction in CT-guided spine biopsies does not reduce diagnostic yield.

Authors:  K A Shpilberg; B N Delman; L N Tanenbaum; S J Esses; R Subramaniam; A H Doshi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Estimated effective dose of CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation of liver tumors.

Authors:  Byung Kwan Park; Paul R Morrison; Servet Tatli; Usha Govindarajulu; Kemal Tuncali; Phil Judy; Paul B Shyn; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Patient dose considerations in computed tomography examinations.

Authors:  Ioannis A Tsalafoutas; Georgios V Koukourakis
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-07-28

10.  Improvement of image quality and dose management in CT fluoroscopy by iterative 3D image reconstruction.

Authors:  Oliver S Grosser; Christian Wybranski; Dennis Kupitz; Maciej Powerski; Konrad Mohnike; Maciej Pech; Holger Amthauer; Jens Ricke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.