Literature DB >> 16060314

Patient doses in multi-slice CT and the importance of optimisation.

J C P Heggie1.   

Abstract

Substantive surveys of patient doses arising from CT examinations have been conducted in our Hospital. In the first instance doses were measured on a single-slice Siemens Plus 4 scanner. A similar survey was conducted initially following commissioning of a Siemens multi-slice Sensation scanner and subsequently after some effort was made to optimise scanning protocols. Doses are reported in terms of dose-length products (DLPs) and as effective doses. The optimisation process on the multi-slice scanner resulted in a reduction in DLP values by between 14% and 58%. With two exceptions, significantly lower or comparable DLP values were obtained when meaningful comparisons were made with results previously obtained with the single-slice scanner. Specific results for the multi-slice scanner in terms of the median DLP in mGy.cm (and median effective dose in mSv) are: routine brain, 660 (1.5); routine chest, 195 (4.0); chest with portal liver phase, 370 (7.2); routine chest with high resolution component, 250 (5.1); chest/abdomen/pelvis with contrast, 560 (11.0); routine abdomen without contrast, 145 (2.4); routine abdomen with contrast 215 (3.6); routine abdomen/pelvis without contrast, 230 (4.4); routine abdomen/pelvis with contrast, 345 (6.3); abdomen/pelvis triple phase, 715 (13.3); renal scan, 260 (4.6); lumbar spine, 445 (7.2); cerebral angiography, 240 (0.58); pulmonary angiography, 165 (3.4); aortic angiography, 305 (5.7). Based on the survey findings possible values for CT examination local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) are suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16060314     DOI: 10.1007/bf03178698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 0158-9938            Impact factor:   1.430


  7 in total

Review 1.  Estimating radiation risk from computed tomography scanning.

Authors:  Vadim Fayngersh; Michael Passero
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.584

2.  Diagnostic CT radiation and cancer induction.

Authors:  Paula J Richards; Jennifer George
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Gradient-enhanced volume rendering: an image processing strategy to facilitate whole small bowel imaging with MRI.

Authors:  Michael Wyss; Johannes M Froehlich; Michael A Patak; Christoph F Juli; Markus B Scheidegger; Christoph L Zollikofer; Klaus U Wentz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Patient dose considerations in computed tomography examinations.

Authors:  Ioannis A Tsalafoutas; Georgios V Koukourakis
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-07-28

5.  National diagnostic reference level initiative for computed tomography examinations in Kenya.

Authors:  Geoffrey K Korir; Jeska S Wambani; Ian K Korir; Mark A Tries; Patrick K Boen
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 0.972

6.  Assessment of paediatric CT dose indicators for the purpose of optimisation.

Authors:  Z Brady; F Ramanauskas; T M Cain; P N Johnston
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  RSA in Spine: A Review.

Authors:  Ali Humadi; Sulaf Dawood; Klas Halldin; Brian Freeman
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-07-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.