Literature DB >> 25475516

Does ghost ileostomy have a role in the laparoscopic rectal surgery era? A randomized controlled trial.

Francesco Saverio Mari1, Tatiana Di Cesare, Luciano Novi, Marcello Gasparrini, Giammauro Berardi, Giovanni Guglielmo Laracca, Andrea Liverani, Antonio Brescia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage following anterior rectal resection is the most important and most commonly faced complication of laparoscopy and open surgery. To prevent this complication, the construction of a preventing stoma is usually adopted. It is not easy to decide whether to construct a protective stoma in patients with a medium risk of anastomotic leakage. In these patients, ghost ileostomy (GI), a pre-stage ileostomy that can be externalized and opened if needed, has proved useful. We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled study to evaluate the advantages of GI in laparoscopic rectal resection.
METHODS: All patients with surgical indications for laparoscopic rectal resection who were at medium risk for anastomotic leakage from January 2007 to January 2013 were included and were randomly divided in 2 groups. All of the patients were subjected to laparoscopic anterior rectal resection with the performance of GI (group A) or without the construction of any protective stoma (group B). The presence and severity of clinically evident postoperative anastomotic leakage and other postoperative complications and reinterventions were investigated.
RESULTS: Of the 55 patients allocated to group A, 3 experienced anastomotic leakage compared with 4 in group B. The patients with GI experienced a lower severity of anastomotic leakage and shorter hospitalization compared with the patients in group B. None of the patients with GI and anastomotic leakage required laparotomy to treat the dehiscence.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of GI in laparoscopic rectal resections in patients at medium risk for anastomotic leakage was useful because it allowed for the avoidance of stoma creation in all of the patients, thus reducing the number of stomas performed, improving the quality of life of the patients and preserving, in most cases, the benefits gained by laparoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25475516     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3974-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  39 in total

1.  The indications for a diverting stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective multicentre study of 222 patients from Japanese cancer centers.

Authors:  A Shiomi; M Ito; N Saito; T Hirai; M Ohue; Y Kubo; Y Takii; T Sudo; M Kotake; Y Moriya
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 2.  The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases.

Authors:  Andre Chow; Henry S Tilney; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Santhini Jeyarajah; Emmanouil Zacharakis; Sanjay Purkayastha
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

Review 4.  Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Bogdan C Paun; Scott Cassie; Anthony R MacLean; Elijah Dixon; W Donald Buie
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  What is the risk for a permanent stoma after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer? A six-year follow-up of a multicenter trial.

Authors:  Rickard Lindgren; Olof Hallböök; Jörgen Rutegård; Rune Sjödahl; Peter Matthiessen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients.

Authors:  A Vignali; V W Fazio; I C Lavery; J W Milsom; J M Church; T L Hull; S A Strong; J R Oakley
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth G Walker; Stephen W Bell; Matthew J F X Rickard; Daniel Mehanna; Owen F Dent; Pierre H Chapuis; E Leslie Bokey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Identifying important predictors for anastomotic leak after colon and rectal resection: prospective study on 616 patients.

Authors:  Koianka Trencheva; Kevin P Morrissey; Martin Wells; Carol A Mancuso; Sang W Lee; Toyooki Sonoda; Fabrizio Michelassi; Mary E Charlson; Jeffrey W Milsom
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision: the Korean laparoscopic colorectal surgery study group.

Authors:  Jun Seok Park; Gyu-Seog Choi; Seon Hahn Kim; Hyeong Rok Kim; Nam Kyu Kim; Kang Young Lee; Sung Bum Kang; Ji Yeon Kim; Kil Yeon Lee; Byung Chun Kim; Byung Noe Bae; Gyung Mo Son; Sun Il Lee; Hyun Kang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Ghost Ileostomy with or without abdominal parietal split.

Authors:  Michele Cerroni; Roberto Cirocchi; Umberto Morelli; Stefano Trastulli; Jacopo Desiderio; Mario Mezzacapo; Chiara Listorti; Luigi Esperti; Diego Milani; Nicola Avenia; Nino Gullà; Giuseppe Noya; Carlo Boselli
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  10 in total

1.  Routine Virtual Ileostomy Following Restorative Proctocolectomy for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.

Authors:  Peter C Ambe; Hubert Zirngibl; Gabriela Möslein
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Initial experience with taTME in patients undergoing laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  P C Ambe; H Zirngibl; G Möslein
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Italian guidelines for the surgical management of enteral stomas in adults.

Authors:  F Ferrara; D Parini; A Bondurri; M Veltri; M Barbierato; F Pata; F Cattaneo; A Tafuri; C Forni; G Roveron; G Rizzo
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Comparative study between ghost ileostomy and defunctioning ileostomy in terms of morbidity and cost-effectiveness in low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Serkan Zenger; Bulent Gurbuz; Ugur Can; Emre Balik; Tunc Yalti; Dursun Bugra
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Ghost Ileostomy: Safe and Cost-effective Alternative to Ileostomy After Rectal Resection for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis.

Authors:  Alberto Vega Hernández; Jakob Otten; Hildegard Christ; Christoph Ulrici; Elvin Piriyev; Sebastian Ludwig; Claudia Rudroff
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  Intestinal Ostomy.

Authors:  Peter C Ambe; Nadja Rebecca Kurz; Claudia Nitschke; Siad F Odeh; Gabriela Möslein; Hubert Zirngibl
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Virtual ileostomy in elective colorectal surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  I Baloyiannis; K Perivoliotis; A Diamantis; G Tzovaras
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Defunctioning ileostomy reduces leakage rate in rectal cancer surgery - systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Magdalena Pisarska; Natalia Gajewska; Piotr Małczak; Michał Wysocki; Jan Witowski; Grzegorz Torbicz; Piotr Major; Magdalena Mizera; Marcin Dembiński; Marcin Migaczewski; Andrzej Budzyński; Michał Pędziwiatr
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-04-17

9.  Ghost ileostomy versus conventional loop ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer (DRKS00013997): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Felix J Hüttner; Pascal Probst; André Mihaljevic; Pietro Contin; Colette Dörr-Harim; Alexis Ulrich; Martin Schneider; Markus W Büchler; Markus K Diener; Phillip Knebel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Rectoseminal vesicle fistula after radical surgery for rectal cancer: Four case reports and a literature review.

Authors:  Zhi-Xiu Xia; Jin-Chun Cong; Hong Zhang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 1.337

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.