Literature DB >> 21159912

The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics.

S Kapila1, R S Conley, W E Harrell.   

Abstract

Cone beam CT (CBCT) has become an increasingly important source of three dimensional (3D) volumetric data in clinical orthodontics since its introduction into dentistry in 1998. The purpose of this manuscript is to highlight the current understanding of, and evidence for, the clinical use of CBCT in orthodontics, and to review the findings to answer clinically relevant questions. Currently available information from studies using CBCT can be organized into five broad categories: 1, the assessment of CBCT technology; 2, its use in craniofacial morphometric analyses; 3, incidental and missed findings; 4, analysis of treatment outcomes; and 5, efficacy of CBCT in diagnosis and treatment planning. The findings in these topical areas are summarized, followed by current indications and protocols for the use of CBCT in specific cases. Despite the increasing popularity of CBCT in orthodontics, and its advantages over routine radiography in specific cases, the effects of information derived from these images in altering diagnosis and treatment decisions has not been demonstrated in several types of cases. It has therefore been recommended that CBCT be used in select cases in which conventional radiography cannot supply satisfactory diagnostic information; these include cleft palate patients, assessment of unerupted tooth position, supernumerary teeth, identification of root resorption and for planning orthognathic surgery. The need to image other types of cases should be made on a case-by-case basis following an assessment of benefits vs risks of scanning in these situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21159912      PMCID: PMC3611465          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/12615645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  33 in total

1.  Development of imaging selection criteria and procedures should precede cephalometric assessment with cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Allan G Farman; William C Scarfe
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Surgical positioning of orthodontic mini-implants with guides fabricated on models replicated with cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Seong-Hun Kim; Yong-Suk Choi; Eui-Hwan Hwang; Kyu-Rhim Chung; Yoon-Ah Kook; Gerald Nelson
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Value of two cone-beam computed tomography systems from an orthodontic point of view.

Authors:  Heike Korbmacher; Bärbel Kahl-Nieke; Max Schöllchen; Max Heiland
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures.

Authors:  S A Stratemann; J C Huang; K Maki; A J Miller; D C Hatcher
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint: comparisons with panoramic radiology and linear tomography.

Authors:  Oana Bida Honey; William Charles Scarfe; Michael J Hilgers; Kathleen Klueber; Anibal M Silveira; Bruce S Haskell; Allan G Farman
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Facial deformity of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  B Guyuron
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Factors affecting buccal bone changes of maxillary posterior teeth after rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Kitichai Rungcharassaeng; Joseph M Caruso; Joseph Y K Kan; Jay Kim; Guy Taylor
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Vertical bone volume in the paramedian palate of adolescents: a computed tomography study.

Authors:  Keith S King; Ernest W Lam; M Gary Faulkner; Giseon Heo; Paul W Major
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Verification of clinical precision after computer-aided reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Marc Christian Metzger; Bettina Hohlweg-Majert; Ralf Schön; Matthias Teschner; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Rainer Schmelzeisen; Ralf Gutwald
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2007-07-26

10.  Incidental findings in the maxillofacial area with 3-dimensional cone-beam imaging.

Authors:  Jung-Yul Cha; James Mah; Peter Sinclair
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  66 in total

1.  The KPG index--a novel 3D classification system for maxillary canine impactions.

Authors:  Daniel E San Martín; Jeryl D English; Chung H Kau; Ronald L Gallerano; Kathleen R McGrory; Anna M Salas; Jerry Bouquot; James J Xia
Journal:  Tex Dent J       Date:  2012-03

2.  Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i-CAT cone beam CT.

Authors:  R A Katkar; C Kummet; D Dawson; L Moreno Uribe; V Allareddy; M Finkelstein; A Ruprecht
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Comparison of interradicular distances and cortical bone thickness in Thai patients with Class I and Class II skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Nattida Khumsarn; Virush Patanaporn; Apirum Janhom; Dhirawat Jotikasthira
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2016-06-23

4.  Fast three-dimensional superimposition of cone beam computed tomography for orthopaedics and orthognathic surgery evaluation.

Authors:  A Weissheimer; L M Menezes; L Koerich; J Pham; L H S Cevidanes
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  Differential treatment effects of two anchorage systems for rapid maxillary expansion: a retrospective cephalometric study.

Authors:  Jan Hourfar; Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Björn Ludwig; Julia Spindler; Jörg Alexander Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Cone-beam computed tomography: a new low dose, high resolution imaging technique of the wrist, presentation of three cases with technique.

Authors:  Jens De Cock; Koen Mermuys; Jean Goubau; Simon Van Petegem; Brecht Houthoofd; Jan W Casselman
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Automatic fusion of lateral cephalograms and digital volume tomography data-perspective for combining two modalities in the future.

Authors:  S Sauppe; C Abkai; J Hourfar; B Ludwig; J Ulrici; E Hell
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Comparison of lateral photographic and radiographic sagittal analysis in relation to Angle's classification.

Authors:  Atalia Wasserstein; Nir Shpack; Yossi Ben Yoseph; Silvia Geron; Moshe Davidovitch; Alexander Vardimon
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 9.  CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use.

Authors:  S D Kapila; J M Nervina
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Assessment of phantom dosimetry and image quality of i-CAT FLX cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  John B Ludlow; Cameron Walker
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.