Literature DB >> 16905073

Development of imaging selection criteria and procedures should precede cephalometric assessment with cone-beam computed tomography.

Allan G Farman1, William C Scarfe.   

Abstract

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) systems for craniofacial imaging are now available from several manufacturers. CBCT potentially provides opportunities for 3-dimensional cephalometrics in orthodontic assessment of bony landmarks and air-bounded surfaces such as the facial skin. Two-dimensional cephalogram simulation could facilitate the transfer of growth projections from existing data sets as a starting point for use of a new 3-dimensional paradigm. Three methods are described to simulate conventional 2-dimensional cephalograms from CBCT images and volumetric data sets. However, certain precautions are required to assure that selection criteria and imaging parameters guarantee a radiation dose that is as low as reasonably achievable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16905073     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  43 in total

1.  Comparative study between conventional and cone beam CT-synthesized half and total skull cephalograms.

Authors:  G S Liedke; E L Delamare; M B Vizzotto; H L D da Silveira; J R Prietsch; V Dutra; H E D da Silveira
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.

Authors:  U Oz; K Orhan; N Abe
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Influence of a programme of professional calibration in the variability of landmark identification using cone beam computed tomography-synthesized and conventional radiographic cephalograms.

Authors:  E L Delamare; G S Liedke; M B Vizzotto; H L D da Silveira; J L D Ribeiro; H E D Silveira
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 4.  Modern dental imaging: a review of the current technology and clinical applications in dental practice.

Authors:  Bart Vandenberghe; Reinhilde Jacobs; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics.

Authors:  S Kapila; R S Conley; W E Harrell
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i-CAT cone beam CT.

Authors:  R A Katkar; C Kummet; D Dawson; L Moreno Uribe; V Allareddy; M Finkelstein; A Ruprecht
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Accuracy assessment of the axial images obtained from cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Francine Kühl Panzarella; J L C Junqueira; L B Oliveira; N S de Araújo; C Costa
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 8.  Recent advances in imaging technologies in dentistry.

Authors:  Naseem Shah; Nikhil Bansal; Ajay Logani
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-10-28

Review 9.  Applications of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics: A Review.

Authors:  Aditya Tadinada; Alana Marczak; Sumit Yadav; Padma M Mukherjee
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2016-09-01

Review 10.  Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics.

Authors:  İpek Coşkun; Burçak Kaya
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2018-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.