S K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) is a direct experimental probe of metal ion electronic structure as the pre-edge energy reflects its oxidation state, and the energy splitting pattern of the pre-edge transitions reflects its spin state. The combination of sulfur K-edge XAS and density functional theory (DFT) calculations indicates that the electronic structures of {FeNO}(7) (S = 3/2) (S(Me2)N4(tren)Fe(NO), complex I) and {FeNO}(7) (S = 1/2) ((bme-daco)Fe(NO), complex II) are Fe(III)(S = 5/2)-NO(-)(S = 1) and Fe(III)(S = 3/2)-NO(-)(S = 1), respectively. When an axial ligand is computationally added to complex II, the electronic structure becomes Fe(II)(S = 0)-NO•(S = 1/2). These studies demonstrate how the ligand field of the Fe center defines its spin state and thus changes the electron exchange, an important factor in determining the electron distribution over {FeNO}(7) and {FeO2}(8) sites.
S K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) is a direct experimental probe of metal ion electronic structure as the pre-edge energy reflects its oxidation state, and the energy splitting pattern of the pre-edge transitions reflects its spin state. The combination of n class="Chemical">sulfur K-edge XAS and density functional theory (DFT) calculations indicates that the electronic structures of {FeNO}(7) (S = 3/2) (S(Me2)N4(tren)Fe(NO), complex I) and {FeNO}(7) (S = 1/2) ((bme-daco)Fe(NO), complex II) are Fe(III)(S = 5/2)-NO(-)(S = 1) and Fe(III)(S = 3/2)-NO(-)(S = 1), respectively. When an axial ligand is computationally added to complex II, the electronic structure becomes Fe(II)(S = 0)-NO•(S = 1/2). These studies demonstrate how the ligand field of the Fe center defines its spin state and thus changes the electron exchange, an important factor in determining the electron distribution over {FeNO}(7) and {FeO2}(8) sites.
Authors: Ricardo García Serres; Craig A Grapperhaus; Eberhard Bothe; Eckhard Bill; Thomas Weyhermüller; Frank Neese; Karl Wieghardt Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2004-04-28 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: James P Collman; Ying Yang; Abhishek Dey; Richard A Decréau; Somdatta Ghosh; Takehiro Ohta; Edward I Solomon Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-10-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Michael D Clay; Christopher A Cosper; Francis E Jenney; Michael W W Adams; Michael K Johnson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-03-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Christina D Brown; Michael L Neidig; Matthew B Neibergall; John D Lipscomb; Edward I Solomon Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2007-05-17 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Michael K Coggins; Santiago Toledo; Erika Shaffer; Werner Kaminsky; Jason Shearer; Julie A Kovacs Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 5.165
Authors: Takahiro Hayashi; Jonathan D Caranto; Hirotoshi Matsumura; Donald M Kurtz; Pierre Moënne-Loccoz Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2012-04-09 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Tibor András Rokob; Jakub Chalupský; Daniel Bím; Prokopis C Andrikopoulos; Martin Srnec; Lubomír Rulíšek Journal: J Biol Inorg Chem Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 3.358
Authors: James J Yan; Margarita A Gonzales; Pradip K Mascharak; Britt Hedman; Keith O Hodgson; Edward I Solomon Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2017-01-11 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Aniruddha Dey; Therese Albert; Richard Y Kong; Samantha N MacMillan; Pierre Moënne-Loccoz; Kyle M Lancaster; David P Goldberg Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 5.436
Authors: Manuel Quiroz; Molly M Lockart; Mohamed R Saber; Shaik Waseem Vali; Lindy C Elrod; Brad S Pierce; Michael B Hall; Marcetta Y Darensbourg Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 12.779
Authors: Alison C McQuilken; Yang Ha; Kyle D Sutherlin; Maxime A Siegler; Keith O Hodgson; Britt Hedman; Edward I Solomon; Guy N L Jameson; David P Goldberg Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 15.419