Literature DB >> 21158321

Photoacoustic angiography of the breast.

Robert A Kruger1, Richard B Lam, Daniel R Reinecke, Stephen P Del Rio, Ryan P Doyle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The authors report a noninvasive technique and instrumentation for visualizing vasculature in the breast in three dimensions without using either ionizing radiation or exogenous contrast agents, such as iodine or gadolinium. Vasculature is visualized by virtue of its high hemoglobin content compared to surrounding breast parenchyma. The technique is compatible with dynamic contrast-enhanced studies.
METHODS: Photoacoustic sonic waves were stimulated in the breast with a pulsed laser operating at 800 nm and a mean exposure of 20 mJ/pulse over an area of approximately 20 cm2. These waves were subsequently detected by a hemispherical array of piezoelectric transducers, the temporal signals from which were filtered and backprojected to form three-dimensional images with nearly uniform k-space sampling.
RESULTS: Three-dimensional vascular images of a human volunteer demonstrated a clear visualization of vascular anatomy with submillimeter spatial resolution to a maximum depth of 40 mm using a 24 s image acquisition protocol. Spatial resolution was nearly isotropic and approached 250 microm over a 64 x 64 x 50 mm field of view.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors have successfully visualized submillimeter breast vasculature to a depth of 40 mm using an illumination intensity that is 32 times less than the maximum permissible exposure according to the American National Standard for Safe Use of Lasers. Clearly, the authors can achieve greater penetration depth in the breast by increasing the intensity and the cross-sectional area of the illumination beam. Given the 24 s image acquisition time without contrast agent, dynamic, contrast-enhanced, photoacoustic breast imaging using optically absorbing contrast agents is conceivable in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21158321      PMCID: PMC2994935          DOI: 10.1118/1.3497677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  23 in total

1.  Photoacoustic imaging with deconvolution algorithm.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Da Xing; Yaguang Zeng; Qun Chen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging.

Authors:  Marianne Moon; Daniel Cornfeld; Jeffrey Weinreb
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Characterization of the near infrared absorption spectra of cytochrome aa3 and haemoglobin for the non-invasive monitoring of cerebral oxygenation.

Authors:  S Wray; M Cope; D T Delpy; J S Wyatt; E O Reynolds
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1988-03-30

4.  Photoacoustic ultrasound (PAUS)--reconstruction tomography.

Authors:  R A Kruger; P Liu; Y R Fang; C R Appledorn
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  In vivo absorption, scattering, and physiologic properties of 58 malignant breast tumors determined by broadband diffuse optical spectroscopy.

Authors:  Albert Cerussi; Natasha Shah; David Hsiang; Amanda Durkin; John Butler; Bruce J Tromberg
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  Breast cancer in vivo: contrast enhancement with thermoacoustic CT at 434 MHz-feasibility study.

Authors:  R A Kruger; K D Miller; H E Reynolds; W L Kiser; D R Reinecke; G A Kruger
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography. Risk of breast cancer based on age and mammographic interpretation.

Authors:  K Kerlikowske; D Grady; J Barclay; E A Sickles; V Ernster
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-07-03       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Authors:  R D Rosenberg; W C Hunt; M R Williamson; F D Gilliland; P W Wiest; C A Kelsey; C R Key; M N Linver
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Contrast-enhanced digital mammography.

Authors:  Clarisse Dromain; Corinne Balleyguier; Ghazal Adler; Jean Remi Garbay; Suzette Delaloge
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  Effective x-ray attenuation coefficient measurements from two full field digital mammography systems for data calibration applications.

Authors:  John J Heine; Jerry A Thomas
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  96 in total

1.  Photoacoustic imaging of mesenchymal stem cells in living mice via silica-coated gold nanorods.

Authors:  Jesse V Jokerst; Mridhula Thangaraj; Paul J Kempen; Robert Sinclair; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 15.881

2.  In vivo three-dimensional photoacoustic imaging based on a clinical matrix array ultrasound probe.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Todd N Erpelding; Ladislav Jankovic; Zijian Guo; Jean-Luc Robert; Guillaume David; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Performance characterization of low-cost, high-speed, portable pulsed laser diode photoacoustic tomography (PLD-PAT) system.

Authors:  Paul Kumar Upputuri; Manojit Pramanik
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Biologically relevant photoacoustic imaging phantoms with tunable optical and acoustic properties.

Authors:  William C Vogt; Congxian Jia; Keith A Wear; Brian S Garra; T Joshua Pfefer
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Photoacoustic Tomography Detects Early Vessel Regression and Normalization During Ovarian Tumor Response to the Antiangiogenic Therapy Trebananib.

Authors:  Sarah E Bohndiek; Laura S Sasportas; Steven Machtaler; Jesse V Jokerst; Sharon Hori; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  Photoacoustic breast tomography prototypes with reported human applications.

Authors:  Jan Menke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Performance characterization of an integrated ultrasound, photoacoustic, and thermoacoustic imaging system.

Authors:  Haixin Ke; Todd N Erpelding; Ladislav Jankovic; Changjun Liu; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  Design and evaluation of a laboratory prototype system for 3D photoacoustic full breast tomography.

Authors:  Wenfeng Xia; Daniele Piras; Mithun K A Singh; Johan C G van Hespen; Ton G van Leeuwen; Wiendelt Steenbergen; Srirang Manohar
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 9.  Multiscale Functional and Molecular Photoacoustic Tomography.

Authors:  Junjie Yao; Jun Xia; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.578

10.  Dedicated 3D photoacoustic breast imaging.

Authors:  Robert A Kruger; Cherie M Kuzmiak; Richard B Lam; Daniel R Reinecke; Stephen P Del Rio; Doreen Steed
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.