Literature DB >> 26886681

Biologically relevant photoacoustic imaging phantoms with tunable optical and acoustic properties.

William C Vogt, Congxian Jia, Keith A Wear, Brian S Garra, T Joshua Pfefer.   

Abstract

Established medical imaging technologies such as magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography rely on well-validated tissue-simulating phantoms for standardized testing of device image quality. The availability of high-quality phantoms for optical-acoustic diagnostics such as photoacoustic tomography (PAT) will facilitate standardization and clinical translation of these emerging approaches. Materials used in prior PAT phantoms do not provide a suitable combination of long-term stability and realistic acoustic and optical properties. Therefore, we have investigated the use of custom polyvinyl chloride plastisol (PVCP) formulations for imaging phantoms and identified a dual-plasticizer approach that provides biologically relevant ranges of relevant properties. Speed of sound and acoustic attenuation were determined over a frequency range of 4 to 9 MHz and optical absorption and scattering over a wavelength range of 400 to 1100 nm. We present characterization of several PVCP formulations, including one designed to mimic breast tissue. This material is used to construct a phantom comprised of an array of cylindrical, hemoglobin-filled inclusions for evaluation of penetration depth. Measurements with a custom near-infrared PAT imager provide quantitative and qualitative comparisons of phantom and tissue images. Results indicate that our PVCP material is uniquely suitable for PAT system image quality evaluation and may provide a practical tool for device validation and intercomparison.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26886681      PMCID: PMC4756225          DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.21.10.101405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Opt        ISSN: 1083-3668            Impact factor:   3.170


  42 in total

1.  Determining the optical properties of turbid mediaby using the adding-doubling method.

Authors:  S A Prahl; M J van Gemert; A J Welch
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 1.980

2.  Photoacoustic imaging of clinical metal needles in tissue.

Authors:  Jimmy Su; Andrei Karpiouk; Bo Wang; Stanislav Emelianov
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 3.  A review of tissue substitutes for ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Martin O Culjat; David Goldenberg; Priyamvada Tewari; Rahul S Singh
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Organosilicon phantom for photoacoustic imaging.

Authors:  Cinzia Avigo; Nicole Di Lascio; Paolo Armanetti; Claudia Kusmic; Lucia Cavigli; Fulvio Ratto; Sandro Meucci; Cecilia Masciullo; Marco Cecchini; Roberto Pini; Francesco Faita; Luca Menichetti
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Optical and acoustic properties at 1064 nm of polyvinyl chloride-plastisol for use as a tissue phantom in biomedical optoacoustics.

Authors:  Gloria M Spirou; Alexander A Oraevsky; I Alex Vitkin; William M Whelan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  A realistic deformable prostate phantom for multimodal imaging and needle-insertion procedures.

Authors:  Nikolai Hungr; Jean-Alexandre Long; Vincent Beix; Jocelyne Troccaz
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Paraffin-gel tissue-mimicking material for ultrasound-guided needle biopsy phantom.

Authors:  Sílvio L Vieira; Theo Z Pavan; Jorge E Junior; Antonio A O Carneiro
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Non-invasive carotid imaging using optoacoustic tomography.

Authors:  Alexander Dima; Vasilis Ntziachristos
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Photoacoustic imaging of living mouse brain vasculature using hollow gold nanospheres.

Authors:  Wei Lu; Qian Huang; Geng Ku; Xiaoxia Wen; Min Zhou; Dmitry Guzatov; Peter Brecht; Richard Su; Alexander Oraevsky; Lihong V Wang; Chun Li
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Measurements of phase velocity and group velocity in human calcaneus.

Authors:  K A Wear
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Current and future trends in photoacoustic breast imaging.

Authors:  Srirang Manohar; Maura Dantuma
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2019-06-30

2.  Pulsed laser damage of gold nanorods in turbid media and its impact on multi-spectral photoacoustic imaging.

Authors:  Andrew M Fales; William C Vogt; Keith A Wear; Ilko K Ilev; T Joshua Pfefer
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Effect of laser pulse shaping on photoacoustic dosimetry in retinal models.

Authors:  Robert B Brown; Suzie Dufour; Pascal Deladurantaye; Nolwenn Le Bouch; Pascal Gallant; Sébastien Méthot; Patrick J Rochette; Ozzy Mermut
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Agarose-based Tissue Mimicking Optical Phantoms for Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Afrina Mustari; Izumi Nishidate; Md Abdul Wares; Takaaki Maeda; Satoko Kawauchi; Shunichi Sato; Manabu Sato; Yoshihisa Aizu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 5.  Photoacoustic-guided surgery from head to toe [Invited].

Authors:  Alycen Wiacek; Muyinatu A Lediju Bell
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Dynamic blood flow phantom with negative and positive photoacoustic contrasts.

Authors:  Hind J Jawad; Mustafa Sarimollaoglu; Alexandru S Biris; Vladimir P Zharov
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Algorithm for rapid determination of optical scattering parameters.

Authors:  Zachary H Levine; Richelle H Streater; Anne-Michelle R Lieberson; Adam L Pintar; Catherine C Cooksey; Paul Lemaillet
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 8.  Criteria for the design of tissue-mimicking phantoms for the standardization of biophotonic instrumentation.

Authors:  Lina Hacker; Heidrun Wabnitz; Antonio Pifferi; T Joshua Pfefer; Brian W Pogue; Sarah E Bohndiek
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 25.671

9.  Engineering Plasmonic Nanoparticles for Enhanced Photoacoustic Imaging.

Authors:  Yash Mantri; Jesse V Jokerst
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 15.881

10.  Semi-anthropomorphic photoacoustic breast phantom.

Authors:  Maura Dantuma; Rianne van Dommelen; Srirang Manohar
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.732

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.