Literature DB >> 9807581

Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

R D Rosenberg1, W C Hunt, M R Williamson, F D Gilliland, P W Wiest, C A Kelsey, C R Key, M N Linver.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine how common patient factors affect screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors used a population-based database of 183,134 screening mammograms and a statewide tumor registry to identify 807 breast cancers detected at screening mammography.
RESULTS: Sensitivity varied significantly with ethnicity, use of estrogen replacement therapy, mammographic breast density, and age. Sensitivity was 54% (13 of 24) in women younger than 40 years, 77% (121 of 157) in women aged 40-49 years, 78% (224 of 286) in women aged 50-64 years, and 81% (277 of 340) in women older than 64 years. Sensitivity was 68% (162 of 237) for dense breasts and 85% (302 of 356) for nondense breasts and 74% (180 of 244) in estrogen replacement therapy users and 81% (417 of 513) in nonusers. Sensitivity was most markedly reduced with the combination of dense breasts and estrogen replacement therapy use; there was little difference when only one factor was present. Median cancer size and the percentage of early cancers showed little change with any factors.
CONCLUSION: Age is a minor determinant of mammographic sensitivity in women aged 40 years or older. Sensitivity is substantially decreased with the combination of higher breast density and estrogen replacement therapy use. There was not a notable shift in cancer outcomes in the groups with lower mammographic sensitivity. These data do not support different screening recommendations in women aged 40-49 years or in estrogen replacement therapy users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9807581     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.209.2.9807581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  60 in total

Review 1.  Integration of breast imaging into cancer management.

Authors:  L J Esserman; D Wolverton; N Hylton
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Simulation study comparing high-purity germanium and cadmium zinc telluride detectors for breast imaging.

Authors:  D L Campbell; T E Peterson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results.

Authors:  Clarisse Dromain; Fabienne Thibault; Serge Muller; Françoise Rimareix; Suzette Delaloge; Anne Tardivon; Corinne Balleyguier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Photoacoustic angiography of the breast.

Authors:  Robert A Kruger; Richard B Lam; Daniel R Reinecke; Stephen P Del Rio; Ryan P Doyle
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists.

Authors:  William E Barlow; Chen Chi; Patricia A Carney; Stephen H Taplin; Carl D'Orsi; Gary Cutter; R Edward Hendrick; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Automated analysis of breast parenchymal patterns in whole breast ultrasound images: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Yuji Ikedo; Takako Morita; Daisuke Fukuoka; Takeshi Hara; Gobert Lee; Hiroshi Fujita; Etsuo Takada; Tokiko Endo
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Breast tissue characterization with photon-counting spectral CT imaging: a postmortem breast study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Michael J Klopfer; Justin L Ducote; Fumitaro Masaki; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Influence of personal characteristics of individual women on sensitivity and specificity of mammography in the Million Women Study: cohort study.

Authors:  Emily Banks; Gillian Reeves; Valerie Beral; Diana Bull; Barbara Crossley; Moya Simmonds; Elizabeth Hilton; Stephen Bailey; Nigel Barrett; Peter Briers; Ruth English; Alan Jackson; Elizabeth Kutt; Janet Lavelle; Linda Rockall; Matthew G Wallis; Mary Wilson; Julietta Patnick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-08-28

10.  Correlation between breast density in mammography and background enhancement in MR mammography.

Authors:  R Cubuk; N Tasali; B Narin; F Keskiner; L Celik; S Guney
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.