Literature DB >> 24298416

Design and evaluation of a laboratory prototype system for 3D photoacoustic full breast tomography.

Wenfeng Xia1, Daniele Piras, Mithun K A Singh, Johan C G van Hespen, Ton G van Leeuwen, Wiendelt Steenbergen, Srirang Manohar.   

Abstract

Photoacoustic imaging can visualize vascularization-driven optical absorption contrast with great potential for breast cancer detection and diagnosis. State-of-the-art photoacoustic breast imaging systems are promising but are limited either by only a 2D imaging capability or by an insufficient imaging field-of-view (FOV). We present a laboratory prototype system designed for 3D photoacoustic full breast tomography, and comprehensively characterize it and evaluate its performance in imaging phantoms. The heart of the system is an ultrasound detector array specifically developed for breast imaging and optimized for high sensitivity. Each detector element has an acoustic lens to enlarge the acceptance angle of the large surface area detector elements to ensure a wide system FOV. We characterized the ultrasound detector array performance in terms of frequency response, directional sensitivity, minimum detectable pressure and inter-element electrical and mechanical cross-talk. Further we evaluated the system performance of the laboratory prototype imager using well-defined breast mimicking phantoms. The system possesses a 2 mm XY plane resolution and a 6 mm vertical resolution. A vasculature mimicking object was successfully visualized down to a depth of 40 mm in the breast phantom. Further, tumor mimicking spherical objects with 5 and 10 mm diameter at 20 mm and 40 mm depths are recovered, indicating high system sensitivity. The system has a 170 × 170 × 170 mm(3) FOV, which is well suited for full breast imaging. Various recommendations are provided for performance improvement and to guide this laboratory prototype to a clinical version in future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (040.0040) Detectors; (110.5120) Photoacoustic imaging; (110.6955) Tomographic imaging; (170.3830) Mammography

Year:  2013        PMID: 24298416      PMCID: PMC3829550          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.4.002555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.732


  31 in total

Review 1.  Non-invasive in vivo characterization of breast tumors using photon migration spectroscopy.

Authors:  B J Tromberg; N Shah; R Lanning; A Cerussi; J Espinoza; T Pham; L Svaasand; J Butler
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  Fast calculation of pulsed photoacoustic fields in fluids using k-space methods.

Authors:  B T Cox; P C Beard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Design and evaluation of a hybrid photoacoustic tomography and diffuse optical tomography system for breast cancer detection.

Authors:  Lei Xi; Xiaoqi Li; Lei Yao; Stephen Grobmyer; Huabei Jiang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Diffuse optical spectroscopy of breast tissue extended to 1100 nm.

Authors:  Paola Taroni; Andrea Bassi; Daniela Comelli; Andrea Farina; Rinaldo Cubeddu; Antonio Pifferi
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Passive element enriched photoacoustic computed tomography (PER PACT) for simultaneous imaging of acoustic propagation properties and light absorption.

Authors:  Jithin Jose; Rene G H Willemink; Steffen Resink; Daniele Piras; J C G van Hespen; Cornelis H Slump; Wiendelt Steenbergen; Ton G van Leeuwen; Srirang Manohar
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  An optimized ultrasound detector for photoacoustic breast tomography.

Authors:  Wenfeng Xia; Daniele Piras; Johan C G van Hespen; Spiridon van Veldhoven; Christian Prins; Ton G van Leeuwen; Wiendelt Steenbergen; Srirang Manohar
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Poly(vinyl alcohol) gels as photoacoustic breast phantoms revisited.

Authors:  Wenfeng Xia; Daniele Piras; Michelle Heijblom; Wiendelt Steenbergen; Ton G van Leeuwen; Srirang Manohar
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 8.  The descriptive epidemiology of female breast cancer: an international comparison of screening, incidence, survival and mortality.

Authors:  Danny R Youlden; Susanna M Cramb; Nathan A M Dunn; Jennifer M Muller; Christopher M Pyke; Peter D Baade
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  In vivo breast sound-speed imaging with ultrasound tomography.

Authors:  Cuiping Li; Nebojsa Duric; Peter Littrup; Lianjie Huang
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Initial results of in vivo non-invasive cancer imaging in the human breast using near-infrared photoacoustics.

Authors:  Srirang Manohar; Susanne E Vaartjes; Johan C G van Hespen; Joost M Klaase; Frank M van den Engh; Wiendelt Steenbergen; Ton G van Leeuwen
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  10 in total

1.  Performance characterization of low-cost, high-speed, portable pulsed laser diode photoacoustic tomography (PLD-PAT) system.

Authors:  Paul Kumar Upputuri; Manojit Pramanik
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Biologically relevant photoacoustic imaging phantoms with tunable optical and acoustic properties.

Authors:  William C Vogt; Congxian Jia; Keith A Wear; Brian S Garra; T Joshua Pfefer
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 3.  Fast photoacoustic imaging systems using pulsed laser diodes: a review.

Authors:  Paul Kumar Upputuri; Manojit Pramanik
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2018-03-06

4.  High frame rate photoacoustic imaging at 7000 frames per second using clinical ultrasound system.

Authors:  Kathyayini Sivasubramanian; Manojit Pramanik
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Tri-modality cavitation mapping in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Mucong Li; Georgy Sankin; Tri Vu; Junjie Yao; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Review of consensus test methods in medical imaging and current practices in photoacoustic image quality assessment.

Authors:  Jorge Palma-Chavez; T Joshua Pfefer; Anant Agrawal; Jesse V Jokerst; William C Vogt
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 7.  Photoacoustic Imaging in Biomedicine and Life Sciences.

Authors:  Alexey Neprokin; Christian Broadway; Teemu Myllylä; Alexander Bykov; Igor Meglinski
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-14

Review 8.  Breakthroughs in modern cancer therapy and elusive cardiotoxicity: Critical research-practice gaps, challenges, and insights.

Authors:  Ping-Pin Zheng; Jin Li; Johan M Kros
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 12.944

9.  Handheld Real-Time LED-Based Photoacoustic and Ultrasound Imaging System for Accurate Visualization of Clinical Metal Needles and Superficial Vasculature to Guide Minimally Invasive Procedures.

Authors:  Wenfeng Xia; Mithun Kuniyil Ajith Singh; Efthymios Maneas; Naoto Sato; Yusuke Shigeta; Toshitaka Agano; Sebastian Ourselin; Simeon J West; Adrien E Desjardins
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Remote photoacoustic sensing using speckle-analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin Lengenfelder; Fanuel Mehari; Martin Hohmann; Markus Heinlein; Erika Chelales; Maximilian J Waldner; Florian Klämpfl; Zeev Zalevsky; Michael Schmidt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.