Literature DB >> 25855202

When overlap leads to competition: Effects of phonological encoding on word duration.

Loretta K Yiu1, Duane G Watson2.   

Abstract

Some accounts of acoustic reduction propose that variation in word duration is a reflection of the speaker's internal production processes, but it is unclear why lengthening within a word benefits planning. The present study examines whether variability in word length is partly attributable to phonological encoding. In an event-description task, speakers produced words with longer durations when the word shared part of its phonology with a previously articulated word than when it did not. More importantly, lengthening was greater when the overlap was word-initial than when it was word-final. These differences in duration are in line with predictions of serial phonological competition models, which claim that words that overlap in onsets create more competition than words that overlap in offsets and are thus more difficult to produce. That word duration is sensitive to differences in production difficulty suggests a link between speakers' duration choices and phonological encoding. We propose that lengthening provides the production system with the necessary processing time to produce a word's sounds.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic reduction; Processing time; Word duration

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25855202      PMCID: PMC4600006          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0828-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  22 in total

Review 1.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Articulatory duration in single-word speech production.

Authors:  Markus F Damian
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: a functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech.

Authors:  Matthew Aylett; Alice Turk
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.500

4.  Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: effects of phonotactic probability and onset density.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Jonna Armbruster; Shinying Chu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The effects of lexical neighbors on stop consonant articulation.

Authors:  Matthew Goldrick; Charlotte Vaughn; Amanda Murphy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Redundancy and reduction: speakers manage syntactic information density.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The sequential curing effect in speech production.

Authors:  C A Sevald; G S Dell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1994-11

8.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

9.  Repetition is easy: why repeated referents have reduced prominence.

Authors:  Tuan Q Lam; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

10.  Production preferences cannot be understood without reference to communication.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-26
View more
  2 in total

1.  The contribution of form repetition to listeners' expectation of givenness in online reference resolution.

Authors:  Eun-Kyung Lee; Tuan Q Lam; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Discourse Process       Date:  2021-08-03

2.  Word Recall is Affected by Surrounding Metrical Context.

Authors:  Amelia E Kimball; Loretta K Yiu; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.331

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.