Literature DB >> 33506098

The modified Blumgart anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective single center cohort study.

Georgi Kalev1, Christoph Marquardt1, Herbert Matzke1, Paul Matovu1, Thomas Schiedeck1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a major complication after pancreatic head resection whereby the technique of the anastomosis is a very influencing factor. The literature describes a possible protective role of the Blumgart anastomosis.
METHODS: Patients after pancreatic head resection with reconstruction through the modified Blumgart anastomosis (a 2 row pancreatic anastomosis through mattress sutures of the parenchyma and duct to mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy, Blumgart-group) were compared with patients after pancreatic head resection and reconstruction through the conventional pancreatojejunostomy (single suture technique of capsule and parenchyma to seromuscularis, PJ-group). The Data were collected retrospectively. Depending on the propensity score matching in a ratio of 1:2 comparison groups were set up. Blumgart-group (n=29) and PJ-group (n=56). The primary end point was the rate of POPF. Secondary goals were duration of operation, length of hospital stay, length of stay on intermediate care units and hospital mortality.
RESULTS: The rate of POPF (biochemical leak, POPF "grade B" and POPF "grade C") was less in the Blumgart-group, but without statistical relevance (p=0.23). Significantly less was the rate of POPF "grade C" in the Blumgart-group (p=0.03). Regarding the duration of hospital stay, length of stay on intermediate care units and hospital mortality, there was no relevant statistical difference between the groups (p=0.1; p=0.4; p=0.7). The duration of the operation was significantly less in the Blumgart-group (p=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The modified Blumgart anastomosis technique may have the potential to decrease major postoperative pancreatic fistula.
© 2020 Georgi Kalev et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blumgart technique; pancreatic anastomosis; pancreatic fistula; pancreaticojejunostomy; propensity score matching; resection of the pancreatic head

Year:  2020        PMID: 33506098      PMCID: PMC7790181          DOI: 10.1515/iss-2020-0021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Innov Surg Sci        ISSN: 2364-7485


  24 in total

1.  Duct-to-mucosa versus end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Massimo Falconi; Enrico Molinari; William Mantovani; Giovanni Butturini; Andrew A Gumbs; Roberto Salvia; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Giovanni Butturini; Enrico Molinari; Giuseppe Mascetta; Roberto Salvia; Massimo Falconi; Andrew Gumbs; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2003-12-30       Impact factor: 2.588

Review 3.  Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Christos Dervenis; Giovanni Butturini; Abe Fingerhut; Charles Yeo; Jakob Izbicki; John Neoptolemos; Michael Sarr; William Traverso; Marcus Buchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy minimizes severe complications after pancreatic head resection.

Authors:  A Kleespies; M Rentsch; H Seeliger; M Albertsmeier; K-W Jauch; C J Bruns
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Elderly patients have similar short term outcomes and five-year survival compared to younger patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Awad Shamali; Henry D De'Ath; Bashar Jaber; Mahmoud Abuawad; Salvatore Barbaro; Zaed Hamaday; Mohammad Abu Hilal
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 6.071

6.  Novel pancreaticojejunostomy with a low rate of anastomotic failure-related complications.

Authors:  Stephen R Grobmyer; David Kooby; Leslie H Blumgart; Steven N Hochwald
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Pancreaticoduodenal resection. Surgical experience and evaluation of risk factors in 103 patients.

Authors:  J P Lerut; P R Gianello; J B Otte; P J Kestens
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Optimal management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  S G Marcus; H Cohen; J H Ranson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Pancreatogastrostomy Versus Pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction After PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC, DRKS 00000767): Perioperative and Long-term Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Tobias Keck; U F Wellner; M Bahra; F Klein; O Sick; M Niedergethmann; T J Wilhelm; S A Farkas; T Börner; C Bruns; A Kleespies; J Kleeff; A L Mihaljevic; W Uhl; A Chromik; V Fendrich; K Heeger; W Padberg; A Hecker; U P Neumann; K Junge; J C Kalff; T R Glowka; J Werner; P Knebel; P Piso; M Mayr; J Izbicki; Y Vashist; P Bronsert; T Bruckner; R Limprecht; M K Diener; I Rossion; I Wegener; U T Hopt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  PANasta Trial; Cattell Warren versus Blumgart techniques of panreatico-jejunostomy following pancreato-duodenectomy: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Christopher M Halloran; Kellie Platt; Abbie Gerard; Fotis Polydoros; Derek A O'Reilly; Dhanwant Gomez; Andrew Smith; John P Neoptolemos; Zahir Soonwalla; Mark Taylor; Jane M Blazeby; Paula Ghaneh
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of Modified Blumgart Anastomosis on Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Oğuzhan Özşay; Mehmet Can Aydın
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.555

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.