O Belyaev1, W Uhl2. 1. Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-Universiät Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791, Bochum, Deutschland. o.belyaev@klinikum-bochum.de. 2. Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-Universiät Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791, Bochum, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic anastomosis is the Achilles heel of pancreatic surgery. Despite substantial progress in surgical techniques the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistulas remains very high. For this reason various supportive measures to secure pancreatic anastomoses are of continuing interest. OBJECTIVE: This review presents the newest evidence-based data on supportive measures designed to secure a pancreatic anastomosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The most recent meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials and the largest retrospective studies on the role of pancreatic duct stenting, double loop reconstruction, autologous patches and drainage in pancreaticoduodenectomy were taken into account. The value of somatostatin analogues, perioperative nutrition and fluid management is critically discussed. RESULTS: The existing body of evidence on supportive measures is insufficient and remains controversial. The use of somatostatin analogues, drainages and restrictive perioperative fluid management has proven effective. In contrast, routine stenting of the pancreatic duct cannot be recommended. Other approaches, such as double loop reconstruction and use of autologous patches lack sufficient evidence. CONCLUSION: Meticulous surgical technique and surgeon experience remain the cornerstones of performing a safe pancreatic anastomosis; however, some additional supportive measures seem to have significant potential and should be further investigated in large and well-designed prospective clinical trials.
BACKGROUND:Pancreatic anastomosis is the Achilles heel of pancreatic surgery. Despite substantial progress in surgical techniques the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistulas remains very high. For this reason various supportive measures to secure pancreatic anastomoses are of continuing interest. OBJECTIVE: This review presents the newest evidence-based data on supportive measures designed to secure a pancreatic anastomosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The most recent meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials and the largest retrospective studies on the role of pancreatic duct stenting, double loop reconstruction, autologous patches and drainage in pancreaticoduodenectomy were taken into account. The value of somatostatin analogues, perioperative nutrition and fluid management is critically discussed. RESULTS: The existing body of evidence on supportive measures is insufficient and remains controversial. The use of somatostatin analogues, drainages and restrictive perioperative fluid management has proven effective. In contrast, routine stenting of the pancreatic duct cannot be recommended. Other approaches, such as double loop reconstruction and use of autologous patches lack sufficient evidence. CONCLUSION: Meticulous surgical technique and surgeon experience remain the cornerstones of performing a safe pancreatic anastomosis; however, some additional supportive measures seem to have significant potential and should be further investigated in large and well-designed prospective clinical trials.
Authors: Zhi Ven Fong; Camilo Correa-Gallego; Cristina R Ferrone; Gregory R Veillette; Andrew L Warshaw; Keith D Lillemoe; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Matthew T McMillan; John D Christein; Mark P Callery; Stephen W Behrman; Jeffrey A Drebin; Tara S Kent; Benjamin C Miller; Russell S Lewis; Charles M Vollmer Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2014-07-10 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Daniel E Abbott; Jeffrey M Sutton; Peter L Jernigan; Alex Chang; Patrick Frye; Shimul A Shah; Daniel P Schauer; Mark H Eckman; Syed A Ahmad; Jeffrey J Sussman Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Helmut Witzigmann; Markus K Diener; Stefan Kienkötter; Inga Rossion; Thomas Bruckner; Olaf Pridöhl; Olga Radulova-Mauersberger; Heike Lauer; Phillip Knebel; Alexis Ulrich; Oliver Strobel; Thilo Hackert; Markus W Büchler Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: George Van Buren; Mark Bloomston; Steven J Hughes; Jordan Winter; Stephen W Behrman; Nicholas J Zyromski; Charles Vollmer; Vic Velanovich; Taylor Riall; Peter Muscarella; Jose Trevino; Attila Nakeeb; C Max Schmidt; Kevin Behrns; E Christopher Ellison; Omar Barakat; Kyle A Perry; Jeffrey Drebin; Michael House; Sherif Abdel-Misih; Eric J Silberfein; Steven Goldin; Kimberly Brown; Somala Mohammed; Sally E Hodges; Amy McElhany; Mehdi Issazadeh; Eunji Jo; Qianxing Mo; William E Fisher Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 12.969