Literature DB >> 21132074

Extending the Mertonian Norms: Scientists' Subscription to Norms of Research.

Melissa S Anderson1, Emily A Ronning, Raymond Devries, Brian C Martinson.   

Abstract

This analysis, based on focus groups and a national survey, assesses scientists' subscription to the Mertonian norms of science and associated counternorms. It also supports extension of these norms to governance (as opposed to administration), as a norm of decision-making, and quality (as opposed to quantity), as a evaluative norm.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID： 21132074      PMCID： PMC2995462          DOI： 10.1353/jhe.0.0095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Higher Educ        ISSN： 0022-1546


  6 in total

1.  Normative orientations of university faculty and doctoral students.

Authors:  M S Anderson
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Social norms and identity relevance: a motivational approach to normative behavior.

Authors:  P Niels Christensen; Hank Rothgerber; Wendy Wood; David C Matz
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-10

3.  Scientists behaving badly.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Melissa S Anderson; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Scientists' perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Melissa S Anderson; A Lauren Crain; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research.

Authors:  Raymond de Vries; Melissa S Anderson; Brian C Martinson
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  The perverse effects of competition on scientists' work and relationships.

Authors:  Melissa S Anderson; Emily A Ronning; Raymond De Vries; Brian C Martinson
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 3.525
  6 in total
  17 in total

1.  Reducing Ethical Hazards in Knowledge Production.

Authors:  Alan Cottey
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Development and Preliminary Validation of a New Measure of Values in Scientific Work.

Authors:  Tammy English; Alison L Antes; Kari A Baldwin; James M DuBois
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  The Role of Culture and Acculturation in Researchers' Perceptions of Rules in Science.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Tammy English; Kari A Baldwin; James M DuBois
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 4.  Research guidelines in the era of large-scale collaborations: an analysis of Genome-wide Association Study Consortia.

Authors:  Melissa A Austin; Marilyn S Hair; Stephanie M Fullerton
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  'AN INCREDIBLY STEEP HILL:' HOW GENDER, RACE, AND CLASS SHAPE PERSPECTIVES ON ACADEMIC CAREERS AMONG BEGINNING BIOMEDICAL PHD STUDENTS.

Authors:  Christine V Wood; Patricia B Campbell; Richard McGee
Journal:  J Women Minor Sci Eng       Date:  2016

6.  Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Gowri Gopalakrishna; Gerben Ter Riet; Gerko Vink; Ineke Stoop; Jelte M Wicherts; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Transparent, Open, and Reproducible Prevention Science.

Authors:  Sean Grant; Kathleen E Wendt; Bonnie J Leadbeater; Lauren H Supplee; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Frances Gardner; Catherine P Bradshaw
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2022-02-17

8.  Aligning objectives and assessment in responsible conduct of research instruction.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; James M DuBois
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2014-12-15

9.  The Normative Orientations of Climate Scientists.

Authors:  Dennis Bray; Hans von Storch
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  Do oncology researchers adhere to reproducible and transparent principles? A cross-sectional survey of published oncology literature.

Authors:  Corbin Walters; Zachery J Harter; Cole Wayant; Nam Vo; Michael Warren; Justin Chronister; Daniel Tritz; Matt Vassar
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 2.692
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.