Literature DB >> 28597222

Development and Preliminary Validation of a New Measure of Values in Scientific Work.

Tammy English1, Alison L Antes2, Kari A Baldwin2, James M DuBois3.   

Abstract

In this paper we describe the development and initial psychometric evaluation of a new measure, the values in scientific work (VSW). This scale assesses the level of importance that investigators attach to different VSW. It taps a broad range of intrinsic, extrinsic, and social values that motivate the work of scientists, including values specific to scientific work (e.g., truth and integrity) and more classic work values (e.g., security and prestige) in the context of science. Notably, the values represented in this scale are relevant to scientists regardless of their career stage and research focus. We administered the VSW and a measure of global values to 203 NIH-funded investigators. Exploratory factor analyses suggest the delineation of eight VSW, including autonomy, research ethics, social impact, income, collaboration, innovation and growth, conserving relationships, and job security. These VSW showed predictable and distinct associations with global values. Implications of these findings for work on research integrity and scientific misconduct are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Measurement; Research ethics; Research integrity; Responsible conduct of research; Values; Values in scientific work

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28597222      PMCID: PMC5722703          DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9896-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  12 in total

1.  Values and behavior: strength and structure of relations.

Authors:  Anat Bardi; Shalom H Schwartz
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2003-10

2.  Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.

Authors:  Jesse Graham; Jonathan Haidt; Brian A Nosek
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-05

3.  Value stability and change during self-chosen life transitions: self-selection versus socialization effects.

Authors:  Anat Bardi; Kathryn E Buchanan; Robin Goodwin; Letitia Slabu; Mark Robinson
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2013-11-11

4.  Research Agenda: The Effects of Responsible-Conduct-of-Research Training on Attitudes.

Authors:  Michael W Kalichman; Dena K Plemmons
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Refining the theory of basic individual values.

Authors:  Shalom H Schwartz; Jan Cieciuch; Michele Vecchione; Eldad Davidov; Ronald Fischer; Constanze Beierlein; Alice Ramos; Markku Verkasalo; Jan-Erik Lönnqvist; Kursad Demirutku; Ozlem Dirilen-Gumus; Mark Konty
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2012-07-23

6.  Curricular aspects of the Fogarty bioethics international training programs.

Authors:  Amal Matar; Sam Garner; Joseph Millum; Barbara Sina; Henry Silverman
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Misconduct: Lessons from researcher rehab.

Authors:  James M DuBois; John T Chibnall; Raymond Tait; Jillon Vander Wal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Extending the Mertonian Norms: Scientists' Subscription to Norms of Research.

Authors:  Melissa S Anderson; Emily A Ronning; Raymond Devries; Brian C Martinson
Journal:  J Higher Educ       Date:  2010-05-01

9.  Exposure to Unethical Career Events: Effects on Decision-Making, Climate, and Socialization.

Authors:  Michael D Mumford; Ethan P Waples; Alison L Antes; Stephen T Murphy; Shane Connelly; Ryan P Brown; Lynn D Devenport
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2009-09-01

10.  Aligning objectives and assessment in responsible conduct of research instruction.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; James M DuBois
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2014-12-15
View more
  3 in total

1.  Understanding the Use of Optimal Formatting and Plain Language When Presenting Key Information in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Erin D Solomon; Jessica Mozersky; Matthew P Wroblewski; Kari Baldwin; Meredith V Parsons; Melody Goodman; James M DuBois
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  What Explains Associations of Researchers' Nation of Origin and Scores on a Measure of Professional Decision-Making? Exploring Key Variables and Interpretation of Scores.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Tammy English; Kari A Baldwin; James M DuBois
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Perceived barriers to assessing understanding and appreciation of informed consent in clinical trials: A mixed-method study.

Authors:  Erin D Solomon; Jessica Mozersky; Kari Baldwin; Matthew P Wroblewski; Meredith V Parsons; Melody Goodman; James M DuBois
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2021-06-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.