Literature DB >> 21129972

Reinforcement can overcome gene flow during speciation in Drosophila.

Daniel R Matute1.   

Abstract

Reinforcement, the strengthening of prezygotic reproductive isolation by natural selection in response to maladaptive hybridization [1-3], is one of the few processes in which natural selection directly favors the evolution of species as discrete groups (e.g., [4-7]). The evolution of reproductive barriers via reinforcement is expected to evolve in regions where the ranges of two species overlap and hybridize as an evolutionary solution to avoiding the costs of maladaptive hybridization [2,3,8]. The role of reinforcement in speciation has, however, been highly controversial because population-genetic theory suggests that the process is severely impeded by both hybridization [8-11] and migration of individuals from outside the contact zone [12,13]. To determine whether reinforcement could strengthen the reproductive barriers between two sister species of Drosophila in the face of these impediments, I initiated experimental populations of these two species that allowed different degrees of hybridization, as well as migration from outside populations. Surprisingly, even in the face of gene flow, reinforcement could promote the evolution of reproductive isolation within only five generations. As theory predicts, high levels of hybridization (and/or strong selection against hybrids) and migration impeded this evolution. These results suggest that reinforcement can help complete the process of speciation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21129972      PMCID: PMC3019097          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  25 in total

Review 1.  Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry.

Authors:  M A Noor
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Reinforcement and the genetics of nonrandom mating.

Authors:  M R Servedio
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement.

Authors:  P Nosil; B J Crespi; C P Sandoval
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Isolation by disruptive selection.

Authors:  J M THODAY; J B GIBSON
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1962-03-24       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The evolution of premating isolation: local adaptation and natural and sexual selection against hybrids.

Authors:  Maria R Servedio
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Multilocus analysis of introgression between two sympatric sister species of Drosophila: Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea.

Authors:  Ana Llopart; Daniel Lachaise; Jerry A Coyne
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genetics of a difference in pigmentation between Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea.

Authors:  Ana Llopart; Susannah Elwyn; Daniel Lachaise; Jerry A Coyne
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Sexual isolation between two sibling species with overlapping ranges: Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba.

Authors:  Jerry A Coyne; Soo Y Kim; Audrey S Chang; Daniel Lachaise; Susannah Elwyn
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition.

Authors:  M Higgie; S Chenoweth; M W Blows
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-20       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Conspecific sperm precedence in sister species of Drosophila with overlapping ranges.

Authors:  Audrey S Chang
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  The importance of intrinsic postzygotic barriers throughout the speciation process.

Authors:  Jenn M Coughlan; Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Simulated evolution of mating signal diversification in a primate radiation.

Authors:  Sandra Winters; James P Higham
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 5.530

3.  On the Coyne and Orr-igin of species: effects of intrinsic postzygotic isolation, ecological differentiation, x chromosome size, and sympatry on Drosophila speciation.

Authors:  Michael Turelli; Jeremy R Lipkowitz; Yaniv Brandvain
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Fine-scale geographic patterns of gene flow and reproductive character displacement in Drosophila subquinaria and Drosophila recens.

Authors:  Kelly A Dyer; Emily R Bewick; Brooke E White; Michael J Bray; Devon P Humphreys
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Seeking signatures of reinforcement at the genetic level: a hitchhiking mapping and candidate gene approach in the house mouse.

Authors:  Carole M Smadja; Etienne Loire; Pierre Caminade; Marios Thoma; Yasmin Latour; Camille Roux; Michaela Thoss; Dustin J Penn; Guila Ganem; Pierre Boursot
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Comparative studies on speciation: 30 years since Coyne and Orr.

Authors:  Daniel R Matute; Brandon S Cooper
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Fine scale mapping of genomic introgressions within the Drosophila yakuba clade.

Authors:  David A Turissini; Daniel R Matute
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  The genetic basis of female mate preference and species isolation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Meghan Laturney; Amanda J Moehring
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-08-23

9.  The scope and strength of sex-specific selection in genome evolution.

Authors:  A E Wright; J E Mank
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Multifaceted, cross-generational costs of hybridization in sibling Drosophila species.

Authors:  Erin M Myers; Tiffany I Harwell; Elizabeth L Yale; Abigail M Lamb; W Anthony Frankino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.