Literature DB >> 15965264

Multilocus analysis of introgression between two sympatric sister species of Drosophila: Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea.

Ana Llopart1, Daniel Lachaise, Jerry A Coyne.   

Abstract

Drosophila yakuba is widely distributed in sub-Saharan Africa, while D. santomea is endemic to the volcanic island of São Tomé in the Atlantic Ocean, 280 km west of Gabon. On São Tomé, D. yakuba is found mainly in open lowland forests, and D. santomea is restricted to the wet misty forests at higher elevations. At intermediate elevations, the species form a hybrid zone where hybrids occur at a frequency of approximately 1%. To determine the extent of gene flow between these species we studied polymorphism and divergence patterns in 29 regions distributed throughout the genome, including mtDNA and three genes on the Y chromosome. This multilocus approach, together with the comparison to the two allopatric species D. mauritiana and D. sechellia, allowed us to distinguish between forces that should affect all genes and forces that should act on some genes (e.g., introgression). Our results show that D. yakuba mtDNA has replaced that of D. santomea and that there is also significant introgression for two nuclear genes, yellow and salr. The majority of genes, however, has remained distinct. These two species therefore do not form a "hybrid swarm" in which much of the genome shows substantial introgression while disruptive selection maintains distinctness for only a few traits (e.g., pigmentation and male genitalia).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15965264      PMCID: PMC1456511          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.033597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  68 in total

1.  Evolutionary novelties in islands: Drosophila santomea, a new melanogaster sister species from São Tomé.

Authors:  D Lachaise; M Harry; M Solignac; F Lemeunier; V Bénassi; M L Cariou
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  A species definition for the modern synthesis.

Authors:  J Mallet
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Estimating ancestral population parameters.

Authors:  J Wakeley; J Hey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  DNA polymorphism in a subdivided population: the expected number of segregating sites in the two-subpopulation model.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Lack of polymorphism on the Drosophila fourth chromosome resulting from selection.

Authors:  A J Berry; J W Ajioka; M Kreitman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Natural Wolbachia infections in the Drosophila yakuba species complex do not induce cytoplasmic incompatibility but fully rescue the wRi modification.

Authors:  Sofia Zabalou; Sylvain Charlat; Androniki Nirgianaki; Daniel Lachaise; Hervé Merçot; Kostas Bourtzis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Multilocus analysis of variation and speciation in the closely related species Arabidopsis halleri and A. lyrata.

Authors:  Sebastián E Ramos-Onsins; Barbara E Stranger; Thomas Mitchell-Olds; Montserrat Aguadé
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans: dynamics and parameter estimates from natural populations.

Authors:  M Turelli; A A Hoffmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  49 in total

Review 1.  The historical discovery of the nine species in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup.

Authors:  Jean R David; Françoise Lemeunier; Leonidas Tsacas; Amir Yassin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Behavioural reproductive isolation and speciation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Punita Nanda; Bashisth Narayan Singh
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Phylogeny estimation of the radiation of western North American chipmunks (Tamias) in the face of introgression using reproductive protein genes.

Authors:  Noah Reid; John R Demboski; Jack Sullivan
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  Reinforcement can overcome gene flow during speciation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Selection, recombination and demographic history in Drosophila miranda.

Authors:  Doris Bachtrog; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Rapid and Predictable Evolution of Admixed Populations Between Two Drosophila Species Pairs.

Authors:  Daniel R Matute; Aaron A Comeault; Eric Earley; Antonio Serrato-Capuchina; David Peede; Anaïs Monroy-Eklund; Wen Huang; Corbin D Jones; Trudy F C Mackay; Jerry A Coyne
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  A new approach to estimate parameters of speciation models with application to apes.

Authors:  Celine Becquet; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Slip-sliding away: serial changes and homoplasy in repeat number in the Drosophila yakuba homolog of human cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2.

Authors:  Sarah M Bennett; John M Mercer; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Reinforcement of gametic isolation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Daniel R Matute
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Wolbachia in the Drosophila yakuba Complex: Pervasive Frequency Variation and Weak Cytoplasmic Incompatibility, but No Apparent Effect on Reproductive Isolation.

Authors:  Brandon S Cooper; Paul S Ginsberg; Michael Turelli; Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.