Literature DB >> 26132782

Seeking signatures of reinforcement at the genetic level: a hitchhiking mapping and candidate gene approach in the house mouse.

Carole M Smadja1, Etienne Loire1, Pierre Caminade1, Marios Thoma1, Yasmin Latour1, Camille Roux1, Michaela Thoss2, Dustin J Penn2, Guila Ganem1, Pierre Boursot1.   

Abstract

Reinforcement is the process by which prezygotic isolation is strengthened as a response to selection against hybridization. Most empirical support for reinforcement comes from the observation of its possible phenotypic signature: an accentuated degree of prezygotic isolation in the hybrid zone as compared to allopatry. Here, we implemented a novel approach to this question by seeking for the signature of reinforcement at the genetic level. In the house mouse, selection against hybrids and enhanced olfactory-based assortative mate preferences are observed in a hybrid zone between the two European subspecies Mus musculus musculus and M. m. domesticus, suggesting a possible recent reinforcement event. To test for the genetic signature of reinforcing selection and identify genes involved in sexual isolation, we adopted a hitchhiking mapping approach targeting genomic regions containing candidate genes for assortative mating in mice. We densely scanned these genomic regions in hybrid zone and allopatric samples using a large number of fast evolving microsatellite loci that allow the detection of recent selection events. We found a handful of loci showing the expected pattern of significant reduction in variability in populations close to the hybrid zone, showing assortative odour preference in mate choice experiments as compared to populations further away and displaying no such preference. These loci lie close to genes that we pinpoint as testable candidates for further investigation.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genomics; hybrid zone; major urinary protein; selective sweep; speciation; vomeronasal receptor

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26132782      PMCID: PMC4990122          DOI: 10.1111/mec.13301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  78 in total

Review 1.  Genetic hitchhiking.

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry.

Authors:  M A Noor
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Reinforcement and the genetics of nonrandom mating.

Authors:  M R Servedio
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Individual recognition in mice mediated by major urinary proteins.

Authors:  J L Hurst; C E Payne; C M Nevison; A D Marie; R E Humphries; D H Robertson; A Cavaggioni; R J Beynon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-12-06       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  A microsatellite-based multilocus screen for the identification of local selective sweeps.

Authors:  Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement.

Authors:  P Nosil; B J Crespi; C P Sandoval
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Hitchhiking mapping--functional genomics from the population genetics perspective.

Authors:  Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.639

8.  Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition.

Authors:  M Higgie; S Chenoweth; M W Blows
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-20       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  A microsatellite variability screen for positive selection associated with the "out of Africa" habitat expansion of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M O Kauer; D Dieringer; C Schlötterer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  A test of alternative hypotheses for the evolution of reproductive isolation between spadefoot toads: support for the reinforcement hypothesis.

Authors:  Karin S Pfennig
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Hybridization in Plants: Old Ideas, New Techniques.

Authors:  Benjamin E Goulet; Federico Roda; Robin Hopkins
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Diversity of major urinary proteins (MUPs) in wild house mice.

Authors:  Michaela Thoß; Viktoria Enk; Hans Yu; Ingrid Miller; Kenneth C Luzynski; Boglarka Balint; Steve Smith; Ebrahim Razzazi-Fazeli; Dustin J Penn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Genetic signatures of natural selection in a model invasive ascidian.

Authors:  Yaping Lin; Yiyong Chen; Changho Yi; Jonathan J Fong; Won Kim; Marc Rius; Aibin Zhan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Molecular heterogeneity in major urinary proteins of Mus musculus subspecies: potential candidates involved in speciation.

Authors:  Jane L Hurst; Robert J Beynon; Stuart D Armstrong; Amanda J Davidson; Sarah A Roberts; Guadalupe Gómez-Baena; Carole M Smadja; Guila Ganem
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Comparative Genomic Analysis of the Pheromone Receptor Class 1 Family (V1R) Reveals Extreme Complexity in Mouse Lemurs (Genus, Microcebus) and a Chromosomal Hotspot across Mammals.

Authors:  Kelsie E Hunnicutt; George P Tiley; Rachel C Williams; Peter A Larsen; Marina B Blanco; Rodin M Rasoloarison; C Ryan Campbell; Kevin Zhu; David W Weisrock; Hiroaki Matsunami; Anne D Yoder
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.416

6.  Neurogenomic divergence during speciation by reinforcement of mating behaviors in chorus frogs (Pseudacris).

Authors:  Oscar E Ospina; Alan R Lemmon; Mysia Dye; Christopher Zdyrski; Sean Holland; Daniel Stribling; Michelle L Kortyna; Emily Moriarty Lemmon
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-10-02       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 7.  Regulation of Sexually Dimorphic Expression of Major Urinary Proteins.

Authors:  Dustin J Penn; Sarah M Zala; Kenneth C Luzynski
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 8.  Genomic Signatures of Reinforcement.

Authors:  Austin G Garner; Benjamin E Goulet; Matthew C Farnitano; Y Franchesco Molina-Henao; Robin Hopkins
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.096

9.  The role of copy-number variation in the reinforcement of sexual isolation between the two European subspecies of the house mouse.

Authors:  Henry L North; Pierre Caminade; Dany Severac; Khalid Belkhir; Carole M Smadja
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.