Literature DB >> 12583583

Sexual isolation between two sibling species with overlapping ranges: Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba.

Jerry A Coyne1, Soo Y Kim, Audrey S Chang, Daniel Lachaise, Susannah Elwyn.   

Abstract

Drosophila yakuba is widespread in Africa, whereas D. santomea, its newly discovered sister species, is endemic to the volcanic island of São Tomé in the Gulf of Guinea. Drosophila santomea probably formed after colonization of the island by a D. yakuba-like ancestor. The species presently have overlapping ranges on the mountain Pico do São Tomé, with some hybridization occurring in this region. Sexual isolation between the species is uniformly high regardless of the source of the populations, and, as in many pairs of Drosophila species, is asymmetrical, so that hybridizations occur much more readily in one direction than the other. Despite the fact that these species meet many of the conditions required for the evolution of reinforcement (the elevation of sexual isolation by natural selection to avoid maladaptive interspecific hybridization), there is no evidence that sexual isolation between the species is highest in the zone of overlap. Sexual isolation is due to evolutionary changes in both female preference for heterospecific males and in the vigor with which males court heterospecific females. Heterospecific matings are also slower to take place than are homospecific matings, constituting another possible form of reproductive isolation. Genetic studies show that, when tested with females of either species, male hybrids having a D. santomea X chromosome mate much less frequently with females of either species than do males having a D. yakuba X chromosome, suggesting that the interaction between the D. santomea X chromosome and the D. yakuba genome causes behavioral sterility. Hybrid F1 females mate readily with males of either species, so that sexual isolation in this sex is completely recessive, a phenomenon seen in other Drosophila species. There has also been significant evolutionary change in the duration of copulation between these species; this difference involves genetic changes in both sexes, with at least two genes responsible in males and at least one in females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12583583     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00168.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  30 in total

1.  Wolbachia Acquisition by Drosophila yakuba-Clade Hosts and Transfer of Incompatibility Loci Between Distantly Related Wolbachia.

Authors:  Brandon S Cooper; Dan Vanderpool; William R Conner; Daniel R Matute; Michael Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Multilocus analysis of introgression between two sympatric sister species of Drosophila: Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea.

Authors:  Ana Llopart; Daniel Lachaise; Jerry A Coyne
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Reinforcement can overcome gene flow during speciation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Sexual isolation and cuticular hydrocarbon differences between Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba.

Authors:  Flore Mas; Jean-Marc Jallon
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Rapid and Predictable Evolution of Admixed Populations Between Two Drosophila Species Pairs.

Authors:  Daniel R Matute; Aaron A Comeault; Eric Earley; Antonio Serrato-Capuchina; David Peede; Anaïs Monroy-Eklund; Wen Huang; Corbin D Jones; Trudy F C Mackay; Jerry A Coyne
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Little effect of the tan locus on pigmentation in female hybrids between Drosophila santomea and D. melanogaster.

Authors:  Daniel R Matute; Ian A Butler; Jerry A Coyne
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Slip-sliding away: serial changes and homoplasy in repeat number in the Drosophila yakuba homolog of human cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2.

Authors:  Sarah M Bennett; John M Mercer; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Reinforcement of gametic isolation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Daniel R Matute
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Wolbachia in the Drosophila yakuba Complex: Pervasive Frequency Variation and Weak Cytoplasmic Incompatibility, but No Apparent Effect on Reproductive Isolation.

Authors:  Brandon S Cooper; Paul S Ginsberg; Michael Turelli; Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Behavioral and spermatogenic hybrid male breakdown in Nasonia.

Authors:  M E Clark; F P O'Hara; A Chawla; J H Werren
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.