Literature DB >> 32654642

The importance of intrinsic postzygotic barriers throughout the speciation process.

Jenn M Coughlan1, Daniel R Matute1.   

Abstract

Intrinsic postzygotic barriers can play an important and multifaceted role in speciation, but their contribution is often thought to be reserved to the final stages of the speciation process. Here, we review how intrinsic postzygotic barriers can contribute to speciation, and how this role may change through time. We outline three major contributions of intrinsic postzygotic barriers to speciation. (i) reduction of gene flow: intrinsic postzygotic barriers can effectively reduce gene exchange between sympatric species pairs. We discuss the factors that influence how effective incompatibilities are in limiting gene flow. (ii) early onset of species boundaries via rapid evolution: intrinsic postzygotic barriers can evolve between recently diverged populations or incipient species, thereby influencing speciation relatively early in the process. We discuss why the early origination of incompatibilities is expected under some biological models, and detail how other (and often less obvious) incompatibilities may also serve as important barriers early on in speciation. (iii) reinforcement: intrinsic postzygotic barriers can promote the evolution of subsequent reproductive isolation through processes such as reinforcement, even between relatively recently diverged species pairs. We incorporate classic and recent empirical and theoretical work to explore these three facets of intrinsic postzygotic barriers, and provide our thoughts on recent challenges and areas in the field in which progress can be made. This article is part of the theme issue 'Towards the completion of speciation: the evolution of reproductive isolation beyond the first barriers'.

Keywords:  genetic incompatibilities; introgression; rapid evolution; reinforcement

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32654642      PMCID: PMC7423280          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  215 in total

1.  Hybrid breakdown and mitochondrial dysfunction in hybrids of Nasonia parasitoid wasps.

Authors:  C K Ellison; O Niehuis; J Gadau
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 2.411

2.  The barrier to genetic exchange between hybridising populations.

Authors:  N Barton; B O Bengtsson
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Role of seed germination in adaptation and reproductive isolation in Arabidopsis lyrata.

Authors:  Tuomas Hämälä; Tiina M Mattila; Päivi H Leinonen; Helmi Kuittinen; Outi Savolainen
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Divergent evolution of duplicate genes leads to genetic incompatibilities within A. thaliana.

Authors:  David Bikard; Dhaval Patel; Claire Le Metté; Veronica Giorgi; Christine Camilleri; Malcolm J Bennett; Olivier Loudet
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  THE GENETIC STRUCTURE OF THE HYBRID ZONE BETWEEN THE FIRE-BELLIED TOADS BOMBINA BOMBINA AND B. VARIEGATA: COMPARISONS BETWEEN TRANSECTS AND BETWEEN LOCI.

Authors:  Jacek M Szymura; Nicholas H Barton
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  ASSORTATIVE MATING AND NATURAL SELECTION IN AN IRIS HYBRID ZONE.

Authors:  Mitchell B Cruzan; Michael L Arnold
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Genome-wide patterns of gene flow across a house mouse hybrid zone.

Authors:  Katherine C Teeter; Bret A Payseur; Leslie W Harris; Margaret A Bakewell; Lisa M Thibodeau; Janelle E O'Brien; James G Krenz; Maria A Sans-Fuentes; Michael W Nachman; Priscilla K Tucker
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  The limits to parapatric speciation: Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities in a continent-island model.

Authors:  Claudia Bank; Reinhard Bürger; Joachim Hermisson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Supervised machine learning reveals introgressed loci in the genomes of Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia.

Authors:  Daniel R Schrider; Julien Ayroles; Daniel R Matute; Andrew D Kern
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Divergent sorting of a balanced ancestral polymorphism underlies the establishment of gene-flow barriers in Capsella.

Authors:  Adrien Sicard; Christian Kappel; Emily B Josephs; Young Wha Lee; Cindy Marona; John R Stinchcombe; Stephen I Wright; Michael Lenhard
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  25 in total

1.  Towards the completion of speciation: the evolution of reproductive isolation beyond the first barriers.

Authors:  Jonna Kulmuni; Roger K Butlin; Kay Lucek; Vincent Savolainen; Anja Marie Westram
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  On the completion of speciation.

Authors:  Nicholas H Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Hybrid breakdown is elevated near the historical cores of a species' range.

Authors:  Matthew H Koski; Laura F Galloway; Jeremiah W Busch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Changes in selection pressure can facilitate hybridization during biological invasion in a Cuban lizard.

Authors:  Dan G Bock; Simon Baeckens; Jessica N Pita-Aquino; Zachary A Chejanovski; Sozos N Michaelides; Pavitra Muralidhar; Oriol Lapiedra; Sungdae Park; Douglas B Menke; Anthony J Geneva; Jonathan B Losos; Jason J Kolbe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  P-elements strengthen reproductive isolation within the Drosophila simulans species complex.

Authors:  Antonio Serrato-Capuchina; Emmanuel R R D'Agostino; David Peede; Baylee Roy; Kristin Isbell; Jeremy Wang; Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Mass of genes rather than master genes underlie the genomic architecture of amphibian speciation.

Authors:  Christophe Dufresnes; Alan Brelsford; Daniel L Jeffries; Glib Mazepa; Tomasz Suchan; Daniele Canestrelli; Alfredo Nicieza; Luca Fumagalli; Sylvain Dubey; Iñigo Martínez-Solano; Spartak N Litvinchuk; Miguel Vences; Nicolas Perrin; Pierre-André Crochet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  X chromosome-dependent disruption of placental regulatory networks in hybrid dwarf hamsters.

Authors:  Thomas D Brekke; Emily C Moore; Shane C Campbell-Staton; Colin M Callahan; Zachary A Cheviron; Jeffrey M Good
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Comparative studies on speciation: 30 years since Coyne and Orr.

Authors:  Daniel R Matute; Brandon S Cooper
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Stage-specific disruption of X chromosome expression during spermatogenesis in sterile house mouse hybrids.

Authors:  Erica L Larson; Emily E K Kopania; Kelsie E Hunnicutt; Dan Vanderpool; Sara Keeble; Jeffrey M Good
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.542

10.  Tracing species replacement in Iberian marbled newts.

Authors:  Julia López-Delgado; Isolde van Riemsdijk; Jan W Arntzen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.