Literature DB >> 21117752

Stimulus uncertainty and insensitivity to pitch-change direction.

Samuel R Mathias1, Christophe Micheyl, Peter J Bailey.   

Abstract

In a series of experiments, Semal and Demany [(2006). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 3907-3915] demonstrated that some normally hearing listeners are unable to determine the direction of small but detectable differences in frequency between pure tones. Unlike studies demonstrating similar effects in patients with brain damage, the authors used stimuli in which the standard frequency of the tones was highly uncertain (roved) over trials. In Experiment 1, listeners were identified as insensitive to the direction of pitch changes using stimuli with frequency roving. When listeners were retested using stimuli without roving in Experiment 2, impairments in pitch-direction identification were generally much less profound. In Experiment 3, frequency-roving range had a systematic effect on listeners' thresholds, and impairments in pitch-direction identification tended to occur only when the roving range was widest. In Experiment 4, the influence of frequency roving was similar for continuous frequency changes as for discrete changes. Possible explanations for the influence of roving on listeners' insensitivity to pitch-change direction are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21117752      PMCID: PMC2882662          DOI: 10.1121/1.3365252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  36 in total

1.  Discrimination of frequency steps linked by glides of various durations.

Authors:  A Sek; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  On the binding of successive sounds: perceiving shifts in nonperceived pitches.

Authors:  Laurent Demany; Christophe Ramos
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Informational masking for simultaneous nonspeech stimuli: psychometric functions for fixed and randomly mixed maskers.

Authors:  Nathaniel I Durlach; Christine R Mason; Frederick J Gallun; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; H Steven Colburn; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory frequency discrimination learning is affected by stimulus variability.

Authors:  Sygal Amitay; David J C Hawkey; David R Moore
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-05

5.  Individual differences in the sensitivity to pitch direction.

Authors:  Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Likelihood ratio, optimal decision rules, and correct response probabilities in a signal detection theoretic, equal-variance Gaussian model of the observer in the 4IAX paradigm.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; David P Messing
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-07

7.  The slow formation of a pitch percept beyond the ending time of a short tone burst.

Authors:  Laurent Demany; Catherine Semal
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-11

8.  The decline of pitch discrimination with time.

Authors:  J D HARRIS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1952-02

9.  Individual differences in simultaneous masking with random-frequency, multicomponent maskers.

Authors:  D L Neff; T M Dethlefs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effects of level and frequency on the audibility of partials in inharmonic complex tones.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Brian R Glasberg; Kai En Low; Thomas Cope; Wei Cope
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  Interindividual variability in auditory scene analysis revealed by confidence judgements.

Authors:  C Pelofi; V de Gardelle; P Egré; D Pressnitzer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  On the utility of perceptual anchors during pure-tone frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Samuel R Mathias; Leonard Varghese; Christophe Micheyl; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Inadequate pitch-difference sensitivity prevents half of all listeners from discriminating major vs minor tone sequences.

Authors:  Joselyn Ho; Daniel S Mann; Gregory Hickok; Charles Chubb
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.482

4.  Enhanced perception of pitch changes in speech and music in early blind adults.

Authors:  Laureline Arnaud; Vincent Gracco; Lucie Ménard
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Fast, Continuous Audiogram Estimation Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Xinyu D Song; Brittany M Wallace; Jacob R Gardner; Noah M Ledbetter; Kilian Q Weinberger; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Patterns of enhancement in paretic shoulder kinematics after stroke with musical cueing.

Authors:  Shinil Kang; Joon-Ho Shin; In Young Kim; Jongshill Lee; Ji-Yeoung Lee; Eunju Jeong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Adaptive auditory brightness perception.

Authors:  Kai Siedenburg; Feline Malin Barg; Henning Schepker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.