Literature DB >> 35649937

Inadequate pitch-difference sensitivity prevents half of all listeners from discriminating major vs minor tone sequences.

Joselyn Ho1, Daniel S Mann1, Gregory Hickok1, Charles Chubb1.   

Abstract

Substantial evidence suggests that sensitivity to the difference between the major vs minor musical scales may be bimodally distributed. Much of this evidence comes from experiments using the "3-task." On each trial in the 3-task, the listener hears a rapid, random sequence of tones containing equal numbers of notes of either a G major or G minor triad and strives (with feedback) to judge which type of "tone-scramble" it was. This study asks whether the bimodal distribution in 3-task performance is due to variation (across listeners) in sensitivity to differences in pitch. On each trial in a "pitch-difference task," the listener hears two tones and judges whether the second tone is higher or lower than the first. When the first tone is roved (rather than fixed throughout the task), performance varies dramatically across listeners with median threshold approximately equal to a quarter-tone. Strikingly, nearly all listeners with thresholds higher than a quarter-tone performed near chance in the 3-task. Across listeners with thresholds below a quarter-tone, 3-task performance was uniformly distributed from chance to ceiling; thus, the large, lower mode of the distribution in 3-task performance is produced mainly by listeners with roved pitch-difference thresholds greater than a quarter-tone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35649937      PMCID: PMC9098252          DOI: 10.1121/10.0010161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   2.482


  21 in total

1.  Stimulus uncertainty and insensitivity to pitch-change direction.

Authors:  Samuel R Mathias; Christophe Micheyl; Peter J Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Individual differences in the sensitivity to pitch direction.

Authors:  Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Can nonlinguistic musical training change the way the brain processes speech? The expanded OPERA hypothesis.

Authors:  Aniruddh D Patel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Music and emotion: perceptual determinants, immediacy, and isolation after brain damage.

Authors:  I Peretz; L Gagnon; B Bouchard
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-08

5.  How rests and cyclic sequences influence performance in tone-scramble tasks.

Authors:  Joselyn Ho; Charles Chubb
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Sensitivity to major versus minor musical modes is bimodally distributed in young infants.

Authors:  Scott A Adler; Kyle J Comishen; Audrey M B Wong-Kee-You; Charles Chubb
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Many listeners cannot discriminate major vs minor tone-scrambles regardless of presentation rate.

Authors:  Solena Mednicoff; Stephanie Mejia; Jordan Ali Rashid; Charles Chubb
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Musical ability, music training, and language ability in childhood.

Authors:  Swathi Swaminathan; E Glenn Schellenberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Detection theory analysis of group data: estimating sensitivity from average hit and false-alarm rates.

Authors:  N A Macmillan; H L Kaplan
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Why would Musical Training Benefit the Neural Encoding of Speech? The OPERA Hypothesis.

Authors:  Aniruddh D Patel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.