Literature DB >> 16134462

Auditory frequency discrimination learning is affected by stimulus variability.

Sygal Amitay1, David J C Hawkey, David R Moore.   

Abstract

We explored the effects of training set variability on learning and generalization of pure-tone frequency discrimination (FD) in three groups of untrained, normally hearing adult listeners. Group 1 trained using a fixed standard tone at 1 kHz (fixed), Group 2 on slightly varying (roving) tones around 1 kHz, and Group 3 on widely varying standard frequencies (wide-roving). Initially, two thirds of all listeners had low FD thresholds (good listeners) and one third had intermediate to high thresholds (poor listeners). For good listeners, slight variations in the training set slowed learning but wide variations did not. Transfer to untrained frequencies (up to 4 kHz) and to the fixed condition was equivalent regardless of training condition, but Group 1 listeners did not fully transfer learning to the roving condition. For poor listeners, any variation in the training condition slowed learning and impaired transfer to other frequencies but did not affect transfer to untrained conditions. Thus, the effects of training set on progress and outcome depend on set variability and individual FD ability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16134462     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  38 in total

1.  Stimulus uncertainty and insensitivity to pitch-change direction.

Authors:  Samuel R Mathias; Christophe Micheyl; Peter J Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Temporal dynamics in auditory perceptual learning: impact of sequencing and incidental learning.

Authors:  Barbara A Church; Eduardo Mercado; Matthew G Wisniewski; Estella H Liu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Prolonged maturation of auditory perception and learning in gerbils.

Authors:  Emma C Sarro; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.964

Review 4.  A review of the generalization of auditory learning.

Authors:  Beverly A Wright; Yuxuan Zhang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Intelligibility of naturally produced and synthesized Mandarin speech by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Ying Shi; Jingyuan Chen; Yue Gong; Biao Chen; Yongxin Li; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Learning for pitch and melody discrimination in congenital amusia.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  From comparison to classification: a cortical tool for boosting perception.

Authors:  Mor Nahum; Luba Daikhin; Yedida Lubin; Yamit Cohen; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Training to improve hearing speech in noise: biological mechanisms.

Authors:  Judy H Song; Erika Skoe; Karen Banai; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Learning two things at once: differential constraints on the acquisition and consolidation of perceptual learning.

Authors:  K Banai; J A Ortiz; J D Oppenheimer; B A Wright
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Motivation and intelligence drive auditory perceptual learning.

Authors:  Sygal Amitay; Lorna Halliday; Jenny Taylor; Ediz Sohoglu; David R Moore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.