Literature DB >> 21116759

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty improves function in cuff tear arthropathy.

Betsy M Nolan1, Elizabeth Ankerson, J Michael Wiater.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early failure due to glenoid loosening with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with severe rotator cuff deficiency led to the development of the reverse ball-and-socket shoulder prosthesis. The literature reports improved short-term pain and function scores following modern reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in patients with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore sought to confirm previously reported short-term improvements in pain, function scores, and range of motion, in patients treated with RTSA for CTA and to identify clinical complications and radiographic notching.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 67 patients who underwent 71 primary RTSAs for CTA. The average age was 74 years (range, 54-92 years). All were preoperatively and postoperatively assessed using Constant-Murley and American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) scores. We identified complications and examined radiographs for notching. The minimum followup was 12 months (average, 24 months; range, 12-58 months).
RESULTS: Average Constant-Murley scores improved from 28 preoperatively to 62 postoperatively. Average ASES scores improved from 26 to 76. Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) improved from 23 to 77. Active forward flexion improved from 61° preoperatively (range, 0°-137°) to 121° postoperatively (range, 52°-170°). Active external rotation was not affected. Thirty-five of the 71 shoulders (49%) showed radiographic notching. The overall complication rate was 23%. No patient required reoperation. One patient required closed reduction of a perioperative dislocation.
CONCLUSIONS: RTSA for CTA results in functional improvement, with a low complication rate. However, the longevity of the device is currently unknown. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21116759      PMCID: PMC3148381          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1683-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  28 in total

1.  American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness.

Authors:  Lori A Michener; Philip W McClure; Brian J Sennett
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Glenoid loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty. Association with rotator cuff deficiency.

Authors:  J L Franklin; W P Barrett; S E Jackins; F A Matsen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  [Excentered scapulohumeral osteoarthritis].

Authors:  D Molé; L Favard
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2007-10

4.  Lag signs in the diagnosis of rotator cuff rupture.

Authors:  R Hertel; F T Ballmer; S M Lombert; C Gerber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Treatment of painful pseudoparesis due to irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction with the Delta III reverse-ball-and-socket total shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  C M L Werner; P A Steinmann; M Gilbart; C Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients.

Authors:  Mark Frankle; Steven Siegal; Derek Pupello; Arif Saleem; Mark Mighell; Matthew Vasey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Subscapularis insufficiency and the risk of shoulder dislocation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  T Bradley Edwards; Matthew D Williams; Joanne E Labriola; Hussein A Elkousy; Gary M Gartsman; Daniel P O'Connor
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Roentgenographic findings in massive rotator cuff tears. A long-term observation.

Authors:  K Hamada; H Fukuda; M Mikasa; Y Kobayashi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology.

Authors:  Bryan Wall; Laurent Nové-Josserand; Daniel P O'Connor; T Bradley Edwards; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  Rotator cuff tear arthropathy.

Authors:  Kier J Ecklund; Thay Q Lee; James Tibone; Ranjan Gupta
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.020

View more
  45 in total

1.  The clinical and radiographical results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with eccentric glenosphere.

Authors:  Naoko Mizuno; Patrick J Denard; Patric Raiss; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Expanding roles for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Jay D Keener
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

3.  Long-term impact of scapular notching after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  C Spiry; J Berhouet; C Agout; G Bacle; Luc Favard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  "Shaped" humeral head autograft reverse shoulder arthroplasty : Treatment for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with significant posterior glenoid bone loss (B2, B3, and C type).

Authors:  S Harmsen; D Casagrande; T Norris
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Petrillo; U G Longo; R Papalia; V Denaro
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-04-25

6.  Lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty maintains rotational function of the remaining rotator cuff.

Authors:  Stefan Greiner; Christan Schmidt; Christian König; Carsten Perka; Sebastian Herrmann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Patient-Reported and Objectively Measured Function Before and After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wendy J Hurd; Melissa M Morrow; Emily J Miller; Robert A Adams; John W Sperling; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  J Geriatr Phys Ther       Date:  2018 Jul/Sep       Impact factor: 3.381

8.  The effect of deltoid lengthening on functional outcome for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  V J Sabesan; D Lombardo; D Josserand; D Buzas; T Jelsema; G R Petersen-Fitts; J M Wiater
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-03-30

9.  Influence of glenosphere design and material on clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hans R Bloch; Piero Budassi; Andreas Bischof; Jens Agneskirchner; Christian Domenghini; Marco Frattini; Mario Borroni; Sabine Zoni; Alessandro Castagna
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2014-06-17

10.  Cementless surface replacement hemiarthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: results of over 5-year follow-up in patients with or without rotator cuff deficiency.

Authors:  Nawfal Al-Hadithy; Nicholas Furness; Ronak Patel; Sam Jonas; Attila Jobbagy; Ian Lowdon; David Woods
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2015-03-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.