Literature DB >> 27582931

Influence of glenosphere design and material on clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Hans R Bloch1, Piero Budassi2, Andreas Bischof3, Jens Agneskirchner4, Christian Domenghini1, Marco Frattini2, Mario Borroni5, Sabine Zoni1, Alessandro Castagna5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this multicentre retrospective study was to compare reverse total shoulder arthroplasty clinical outcomes with glenospheres of different diameters, designs and materials.
METHODS: Between 2003 and 2008, 133 patients were divided into three groups: 60 (45%) with 36-mm standard CoCrMo (group A), 21 (16%) with 36-mm eccentric cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (CoCrMo) (group B) and 52 (39%) with 44-mm cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (X-UHMWPE) (group C) glenospheres. Mean (SD) follow-up was 38.7 (17.4) months. Clinical evaluation included Constant score and range of motion. Radiographic analysis included radiolucent lines, instability, loosening and assessment of scapular notching.
RESULTS: Mean Constant score significantly increased for all groups (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.001). Group C allowed a higher and stable increase in range of motion. After 12 months and 24 months, groups C and B showed less pain than group A (Mann-Whitney U-test, p < 0.05). Group C had significantly lower scapular notching than group B (Mann-Whitney U-test, p = 0.001) and A (Mann-Whitney U-test, p = 0.009) at 12 months, 24 months and 36 months. Groups A and C presented 5 (8.3%) and 4 (7.6%) early complications, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study reported good results for all groups, although groups C and A presented better clinical outcomes, significantly lower notching and instability. A 44-mm X-UHMWPE glenosphere allowed a faster and more stable functional recovery, despite poorest pre-operative conditions. Additional long-term studies are needed to evaluate survivorship.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical results; SMR; glenospheres; reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; scapular notching

Year:  2014        PMID: 27582931      PMCID: PMC4935062          DOI: 10.1177/1758573214535574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  28 in total

1.  Neer Award 2005: The Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Duncan Watkinson; Armodios M Hatzidakis; Istvan Hovorka
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Analysis of a retrieved delta III total shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  R W Nyffeler; C M L Werner; B R Simmen; C Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-11

3.  Cuff tear arthropathy: pathogenesis, classification, and algorithm for treatment.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Visotsky; Carl Basamania; Ludwig Seebauer; Charles A Rockwood; Kirk L Jensen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kamal I Bohsali; Michael A Wirth; Charles A Rockwood
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Treatment of painful pseudoparesis due to irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction with the Delta III reverse-ball-and-socket total shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  C M L Werner; P A Steinmann; M Gilbart; C Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients.

Authors:  Mark Frankle; Steven Siegal; Derek Pupello; Arif Saleem; Mark Mighell; Matthew Vasey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The Kessel prosthesis in total shoulder arthroplasty. A five-year experience.

Authors:  L A Broström; R Wallensten; E Olsson; D Anderson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The reverse shoulder prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. a minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients surgical technique.

Authors:  Mark Frankle; Jonathan C Levy; Derek Pupello; Steven Siegal; Arif Saleem; Mark Mighell; Matthew Vasey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  G Walch; R Badet; A Boulahia; A Khoury
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders.

Authors:  F Sirveaux; L Favard; D Oudet; D Huquet; G Walch; D Molé
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  [Shoulder endoprosthesis in the elderly : Hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty? Anatomic or reverse?]

Authors:  J Kircher
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Wear performance of inverted non-conforming bearings in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lorenzo Banci; Alessio Meoli; Martin Hintner; Hans Rudolf Bloch
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-02-07

3.  Larger polyethylene glenospheres in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: are they safe?

Authors:  Carl W Jones; Matthew Barrett; John Erickson; Idah Chatindiara; Peter Poon
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-10-08

Review 4.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part II.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Alexander M Roche; Spencer W Sullivan; Benjamin T Gaal; Stewart Dalton; Arjun Sharma; Joseph J King; Brian M Grawe; Surena Namdari; Macy Lawler; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-10

5.  Inverted-Bearing Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Consequences on Scapular Notching and Clinical Results at Mid-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Alessandro Castagna; Mario Borroni; Luigi Dubini; Stefano Gumina; Giacomo Delle Rose; Riccardo Ranieri
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Three-dimensional kinematics of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison between shoulders with good or poor elevation.

Authors:  Keisuke Matsuki; Shota Hoshika; Yusuke Ueda; Morihito Tokai; Norimasa Takahashi; Hiroyuki Sugaya; Scott A Banks
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-03-31

7.  Diagnosis can predict opioid usage and dependence in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Vani J Sabesan; Arjun Meiyappan; Tyler Montgomery; Charlee Quarless; Ahmed Al-Mansoori; Kiran Chatha
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-11-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.